World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6173
World Ranking
11176
National Ranking
440

Guenther Ruhe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guenther Ruhe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Guenther Ruhe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guenther Ruhe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guenther Ruhe is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada, contributing to the field of Computer Science with a focus on software engineering and related disciplines. Their research portfolio includes 26 publications primarily within Computer Science, with significant work in subfields such as Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Software, and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality.

The scientist has engaged extensively in topics related to Software Engineering Research, covering fourteen publications. Other main topics include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing, Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy, Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies, Open Source Software Innovations, and Manufacturing Process and Optimization.

Guenther Ruhe's recent papers demonstrate a strong focus on software development processes, release planning, and technological investment decision-making. Notable recent works include:

  • "CrowdSim: A Hybrid Simulation Model for Failure Prediction in Crowdsourced Software Development" (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "Release Planning Patterns for the Automotive Domain" (2022, Computers)
  • "Stakeholder identification for a structured release planning approach in the automotive domain" (2022, Requirements Engineering)
  • "Learning Software Project Management From Analyzing Q&A's in the Stack Exchange" (2023, IEEE Access)
  • "Rethinking Technological Investment and Cost-Benefit: A Software Requirements Dependency Extraction Case Study" (2025, IEEE Access)

Their coauthor collaborations include repeated partnerships with researchers such as Maleknaz Nayebi, Gouri Deshpande, Konstantin Kuznetsov, Andreas Zeller, and Kristina Marner. These collaborations reflect an interdisciplinary and cooperative approach across multiple publications.

Publication venues frequently chosen by Ruhe include arXiv (Cornell University), Requirements Engineering, IEEE Access, and Computers. ArXiv hosts the majority of their papers, accounting for eight of their publications.

Best Publications

  • The Cognitive Process of Decision Making

    Yingxu Wang;Guenther Ruhe

  • The art and science of software release planning

    G. Ruhe;M.O. Saliu

  • Toward Data-Driven Requirements Engineering

    Walid Maalej;Maleknaz Nayebi;Timo Johann;Guenther Ruhe

  • Impact Analysis of Missing Values on the Prediction Accuracy of Analogy-based Software Effort Estimation Method AQUA

    Jingzhou Li;A. Al-Emran;G. Ruhe

  • Naming the pain in requirements engineering

    D. Méndez Fernández;S. Wagner;M. Kalinowski;M. Felderer

  • A flexible method for software effort estimation by analogy

    Jingzhou Li;Guenther Ruhe;Ahmed Al-Emran;Michael M. Richter

  • Adopting GQM based measurement in an industrial environment

    F. Van Latum;R. Van Solingen;M. Oivo;B. Hoisl

  • Product Release Planning: Methods, Tools and Applications

    Guenther Ruhe

  • Cost, benefits and quality of software development documentation

    Junji Zhi;Vahid Garousi-Yusifoğlu;Bo Sun;Golara Garousi

  • Optimized Resource Allocation for Software Release Planning

    An Ngo-The;G. Ruhe

  • Supporting Software Release Planning Decisions for Evolving Systems

    O. Saliu;G. Ruhe

  • Status Quo in Requirements Engineering: A Theory and a Global Family of Surveys

    Stefan Wagner;Daniel Méndez Fernández;Michael Felderer;Antonio Vetrò

  • COTS Selection: Past, Present, and Future

    A. Mohamed;G. Ruhe;A. Eberlein

  • A systematic approach for solving the wicked problem of software release planning

    An Ngo-The;Guenther Ruhe

  • Bi-objective release planning for evolving software systems

    Moshood Omolade Saliu;Guenther Ruhe

  • Quantitative studies in software release planning under risk and resource constraints

    G. Ruhe;D. Greer

  • Release Practices for Mobile Apps -- What do Users and Developers Think?

    Maleknaz Nayebi;Bram Adams;Guenther Ruhe

  • What Works Better? A Study of Classifying Requirements

    Zahra Shakeri Hossein Abad;Oliver Karras;Parisa Ghazi;Martin Glinz

  • Usage and usefulness of technical software documentation: An industrial case study

    Golara Garousi;Vahid Garousi-Yusifoğlu;Vahid Garousi-Yusifoğlu;Guenther Ruhe;Junji Zhi

  • Analysis of attribute weighting heuristics for analogy-based software effort estimation method AQUA+

    Jingzhou Li;Guenther Ruhe

  • App store mining is not enough for app improvement

    Maleknaz Nayebi;Henry Cho;Guenther Ruhe

Frequent Co-Authors

Dietmar Pfahl
Dietmar Pfahl University of Tartu
Michael Felderer
Michael Felderer University of Cologne
Tayana Conte
Tayana Conte Federal University of Amazonas
Stefan Wagner
Stefan Wagner University of Stuttgart
Roel Wieringa
Roel Wieringa University of Twente
Casper Lassenius
Casper Lassenius Aalto University
Birgit Penzenstadler
Birgit Penzenstadler Chalmers University of Technology
Yingxu Wang
Yingxu Wang University of Calgary
Walid Maalej
Walid Maalej Hasso Plattner Institute
Rafael Prikladnicki
Rafael Prikladnicki Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA connects you to a wide range of online education routes and exciting careers. For those interested in flexible learning, a 1 year computer science degree online is a fast-track option, offering industry-relevant skills in just one year. This can be an attractive choice for career changers or professionals looking to upskill quickly.

Computer science skills also combine well with other disciplines. For example, if you want a multidisciplinary approach, there are numerous jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree background, blending teaching, technology, and environmental awareness.

Other growing STEM career paths include earning your environmental engineer degree online or pursuing an online degree for mechanical engineering. Both fields leverage computer science knowledge and are essential to innovation in sustainability and design.

Online degrees offer flexible schedules and affordable options, enabling you to access top programs in the USA from anywhere in the world, and develop a diverse skill set for today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Guenther Ruhe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles