World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
9981
World Ranking
4987
National Ranking
401

Bruce E. Deagle publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce E. Deagle sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Bruce E. Deagle D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce E. Deagle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce E. Deagle is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with particular focus on subfields such as Ecology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Aquatic Science.

Deagle's work centers on topics including Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Identification and Quantification in Food, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock, and Marine Animal Studies Overview.

Frequent publication venues for Deagle include Environmental DNA, Molecular Ecology, Scientific Data, Diversity and Distributions, and Cell. These venues reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research related to environmental monitoring, molecular biology techniques, and biodiversity assessments.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Deagle include:

  • "Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder" (2020, Molecular Ecology)
  • "The enormous repetitive Antarctic krill genome reveals environmental adaptations and population insights" (2023, Cell)
  • "Revision and annotation of DNA barcode records for marine invertebrates: report of the 8th iBOL conference hackathon" (2021, Metabarcoding and Metagenomics)
  • "Environmental DNA metabarcoding for monitoring metazoan biodiversity in Antarctic nearshore ecosystems" (2021, PeerJ)
  • "Data on the diets of Salish Sea harbour seals from DNA metabarcoding" (2022, Scientific Data)

Deagle often collaborates with several researchers, including Andrea Polanowski, L. Suter, Laurence J. Clarke, Adriana Radulovici, and Pedro E. Vieira, reflecting ongoing cooperative efforts in environmental DNA and molecular ecology research.

Best Publications

  • Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing.

    Francois Pompanon;Bruce E. Deagle;Bruce E. Deagle;William Oliver Christian Symondson;David Steven Brown

  • Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?

    Bruce E. Deagle;Austen C. Thomas;Julie C. McInnes;Laurence J. Clarke;Laurence J. Clarke

  • DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: Not a perfect match

    Bruce E. Deagle;Simon N. Jarman;Eric Coissac;François Pompanon;François Pompanon

  • Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces.

    Bruce E. Deagle;Roger Kirkwood;Simon N. Jarman

  • Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples – a case study on DNA in faeces

    Bruce E Deagle;Bruce E Deagle;J Paige Eveson;Simon N Jarman

  • DNA metabarcoding-Need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions.

    Lucie Zinger;Aurélie Bonin;Inger G. Alsos;Miklós Bálint

  • Molecular scatology as a tool to study diet: analysis of prey DNA in scats from captive Steller sea lions.

    B. E. Deagle;D. J. Tollit;S. N. Jarman;M. A. Hindell

  • Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: is what goes in what comes out?

    Bruce E. Deagle;André Chiaradia;Julie McInnes;Simon N. Jarman

  • Studying Seabird Diet through Genetic Analysis of Faeces: A Case Study on Macaroni Penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus)

    Bruce E. Deagle;Bruce E. Deagle;Nick J. Gales;Karen Evans;Simon N. Jarman

  • Specific Detection of Pacific Oyster ( Crassostrea gigas ) Larvae in Plankton Samples Using Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction

    Jawahar G. Patil;Rasanthi M. Gunasekera;Bruce E. Deagle;Nicholas J. Bax

  • A Genome-wide SNP Genotyping Array Reveals Patterns of Global and Repeated Species-Pair Divergence in Sticklebacks

    Felicity C. Jones;Yingguang Frank Chan;Jeremy Schmutz;Jane Grimwood

  • Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA-based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count?

    Bruce E. Deagle;Austen C. Thomas;Amanda K. Shaffer;Andrew W. Trites

  • Quantitative DNA metabarcoding: improved estimates of species proportional biomass using correction factors derived from control material.

    Austen C. Thomas;Bruce E. Deagle;J. Paige Eveson;Corie H. Harsch

  • Group-specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based analysis of species diversity and identity in dietary samples.

    S. N. Jarman;B. E. Deagle;B. E. Deagle;N. J. Gales

  • Effect of marker choice and thermal cycling protocol on zooplankton DNA metabarcoding studies

    Laurence J. Clarke;Laurence J. Clarke;Jason M. Beard;Kerrie M. Swadling;Kerrie M. Swadling;Bruce E. Deagle;Bruce E. Deagle

  • Quantitative analysis of prey DNA in pinniped faeces: potential to estimate diet composition?

    Bruce E. Deagle;Bruce E. Deagle;Dominic J. Tollit

  • Population genomics of parallel phenotypic evolution in stickleback across stream–lake ecological transitions

    Bruce E. Deagle;Felicity C. Jones;Yingguang F. Chan;Devin M. Absher

  • Adélie penguin population diet monitoring by analysis of food DNA in scats

    Simon N. Jarman;Julie C. McInnes;Cassandra Faux;Andrea M. Polanowski

  • Optimised scat collection protocols for dietary DNA metabarcoding in vertebrates

    Julie C. McInnes;Julie C. McInnes;Rachael Alderman;Bruce E. Deagle;Mary-Anne Lea

  • Improving accuracy of DNA diet estimates using food tissue control materials and an evaluation of proxies for digestion bias.

    Austen C. Thomas;Simon N. Jarman;Katherine H. Haman;Andrew W. Trites

  • Evaluation and application of microsatellite and major histocompatibility complex variation for stock identification of coho salmon in British Columbia

    Terry D. Beacham;John R. Candy;K. Janine Supernault;Tobi Ming

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon N. Jarman
Simon N. Jarman University of Western Australia
Mark A. Hindell
Mark A. Hindell University of Tasmania
Andrew W. Trites
Andrew W. Trites University of British Columbia
Nicholas J. Gales
Nicholas J. Gales Australian Antarctic Division
Ben Raymond
Ben Raymond Australian Antarctic Division
David M. Kingsley
David M. Kingsley Stanford University
Clive R. McMahon
Clive R. McMahon University of Tasmania
So Kawaguchi
So Kawaguchi Australian Antarctic Division
Pierre Taberlet
Pierre Taberlet Grenoble Alpes University
Thomas E. Reimchen
Thomas E. Reimchen University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Building a future in Ecology and Evolution often means developing a broad skill set and considering diverse career directions. If you’re interested in applying ecological knowledge to people-focused roles, human services online degree programs can provide valuable training in community advocacy and support.

For those with a teaching background, making a shift is possible—read about the journey from teacher to speech language pathologist to see how your biology and communication skills can open doors in speech pathology.

Interested in environmental design? Explore naab-accredited online architecture degrees to connect your ecological expertise with sustainable building and landscape architecture.

Strong quantitative skills can also enhance your impact. Pursuing online mathematics degrees will support research, data analysis, and ecological modeling—key tools for understanding complex biological systems.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce E. Deagle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles