World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
10970
World Ranking
11545
National Ranking
397

Terry D. Beacham publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry D. Beacham sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 253 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Terry D. Beacham D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry D. Beacham sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Terry D. Beacham is affiliated with Fisheries and Oceans Canada in Canada. Their research primarily spans environmental science, with substantial contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist's work is focused on several interconnected subfields including nature and landscape conservation, genetics, molecular biology, ecology, and global and planetary change.

The research topics covered by Terry D. Beacham emphasize areas such as fish ecology and management studies, genetic diversity and population structure, identification and quantification in food, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, marine and fisheries research, genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, and genomics and phylogenetic studies.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Technical Report
  • PLoS ONE
  • Molecular Ecology

Collaborations with other researchers have been an important part of Beacham's career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Éric Rondeau
  • Ruth E. Withler
  • Ben Sutherland
  • Kim Jonsen
  • Ben F. Koop

Selected recent publications by Terry D. Beacham and colleagues are:

  • Accurate estimation of conservation unit contribution to coho salmon mixed-stock fisheries in British Columbia, Canada, using direct DNA sequencing for single nucleotide polymorphisms, 2020, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
  • Demographic history shaped geographical patterns of deleterious mutation load in a broadly distributed Pacific Salmon, 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • The sockeye salmon genome, transcriptome, and analyses identifying population defining regions of the genome, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • The pink salmon genome: Uncovering the genomic consequences of a two-year life cycle, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Long-distance migration is a major factor driving local adaptation at continental scale in Coho salmon, 2022, Molecular Ecology

The body of work by Terry D. Beacham contributes to understanding genetic diversity and population dynamics in salmon species, with a focus on conservation genetics and fisheries management. This includes the application of molecular tools such as DNA sequencing for assessing fish populations and their adaptation patterns across geographical scales.

Best Publications

  • Temperature, Egg Size, and Development of Embryos and Alevins of Five Species of Pacific Salmon: A Comparative Analysis

    Terry D. Beacham;Clyde B. Murray

  • Isolation and cross species amplification of microsatellite loci useful for study of Pacific salmon.

    R. J. Nelson;T. D. Beacham

  • Development of a Standardized DNA Database for Chinook Salmon

    L. W. Seeb;A. Antonovich;Michael A. Banks;T. D. Beacham

  • Discriminating coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) populations within the Fraser River, British Columbia using microsatellite DNA markers.

    M. P. Small;T. D. Beacham;R. E. Withler;R. J. Nelson

  • Harnessing the Power of Genomics to Secure the Future of Seafood

    Louis Bernatchez;Maren Wellenreuther;Maren Wellenreuther;Cristián Araneda;David T. Ashton

  • Fecundity and egg size variation in North American Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus)

    T. D. Beacham;C. B. Murray

  • Managing fisheries using genetic data: case studies from four species of Pacific salmon

    James B Shaklee;Terry D Beacham;Lisa Seeb;Bruce A White

  • Adaptive Variation in Body Size, Age, Morphology, Egg Size, and Developmental Biology of Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in British Columbia

    T. D. Beacham;C. B. Murray

  • Differentiating salmon populations at broad and fine geographical scales with microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms.

    S. R. Narum;M. Banks;T. D. Beacham;M. R. Bellinger

  • Estimation of Stock Composition and Individual Identification of Sockeye Salmon on a Pacific Rim Basis Using Microsatellite and Major Histocompatibility Complex Variation

    Terry D. Beacham;John R. Candy;Brenda McIntosh;Cathy MacConnachie

  • Parallel epigenetic modifications induced by hatchery rearing in a Pacific salmon.

    Jérémy Le Luyer;Jérémy Le Luyer;Martin Laporte;Terry D. Beacham;Karia H. Kaukinen

  • Effect of Female Size, Egg Size, and Water Temperature on Developmental Biology of Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) from the Nitinat River, British Columbia

    Terry D. Beacham;Clyde B. Murray

  • Geographic heterogeneity in natural selection on an MHC locus in sockeye salmon.

    K.M. Miller;K.H. Kaukinen;T.D. Beacham;R.E. Withler

  • Estimating Stock Composition in Mixed Stock Fisheries Using Morphometric, Meristic, and Electrophoretic Characteristics

    D. A. Fournier;T. D. Beacham;B. E. Riddell;C. A. Busack

  • Estimation of Stock Composition and Individual Identification of Chinook Salmon across the Pacific Rim by Use of Microsatellite Variation

    Terry D. Beacham;John R. Candy;Kimberly L. Jonsen;Janine Supernault

  • Development of tri- and tetranucleotide repeat microsatellite loci in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

    K. M. Miller;K. D. Le;T. D. Beacham

  • Stock Identification of Fraser River Sockeye Salmon Using Microsatellites and Major Histocompatibility Complex Variation

    Terry D. Beacham;Michael Lapointe;John R. Candy;Brenda McIntosh

  • Multiple stock structure of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) off Newfoundland and Labrador determined from genetic variation

    Terry D. Beacham;John Brattey;Kristina M. Miller;Khai D. Le

  • Variation in developmental biology of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) in British Columbia

    Terry D. Beacham;Clyde B. Murray

  • Evaluation and application of microsatellite and major histocompatibility complex variation for stock identification of coho salmon in British Columbia

    Terry D. Beacham;John R. Candy;K. Janine Supernault;Tobi Ming

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristina M. Miller
Kristina M. Miller Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Louis Bernatchez
Louis Bernatchez Université Laval
Ben F. Koop
Ben F. Koop University of Victoria
Richard J. Beamish
Richard J. Beamish Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Francis Juanes
Francis Juanes University of Victoria
Shawn R. Narum
Shawn R. Narum University of Idaho
Asit Mazumder
Asit Mazumder University of Victoria
Lisa W. Seeb
Lisa W. Seeb University of Washington
David L. Mackas
David L. Mackas Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Bruce E. Deagle
Bruce E. Deagle Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, especially in healthcare and life sciences. Many graduates choose to specialize in fields that blend science, technology, and patient care, such as medical coding and health information management.

If you are considering a career in health data, understanding the differences between a certified coding specialist (ccs) and other coding certifications is crucial. This distinction impacts job roles, exam costs, and overall salary prospects in medical coding.

A growing number of biochemistry and biology graduates are finding rewarding work in medical coding. For those curious about earning potential, explore what is medical coding salary for a comprehensive overview of pay rates in the field.

Not sure if this path is right for you? Discover the pros and cons by reading is medical coding a good career to weigh its advantages and challenges.

Many reputable universities now offer flexible online study options. To find cost-effective choices, check the health information management online programs that are both affordable and accredited, helping you upskill for a modern healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Terry D. Beacham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles