World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7084 6604 3827 3477 121 16164
Neuroscience 43 7281 6707 3137 2828 124 16201

Timothy T. Rogers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy T. Rogers between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy T. Rogers published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2024. 30 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2024. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 14 publications
1997 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy T. Rogers: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 0
2003 4
2004 4
2005 7
2006 8
2007 7
2008 6
2009 5
2010 12
2011 7
2012 4
2013 6
2014 4
2015 12
2016 5
2017 5
2018 8
2019 5
2020 6
2021 6
2022 13
2023 13
2024 16
2025 14
Total 181
Download as CSV

Timothy T. Rogers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy T. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 121
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy T. Rogers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy T. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Timothy T. Rogers is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans key areas in neuroscience and computer science, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence.

Rogers has contributed extensively to several main topics of research, including:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Topic Modeling
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Their recent publications demonstrate sustained activity in advancing cognitive neuroscience. Among notable papers are:

  • "Reverse-engineering the cortical architecture for controlled semantic cognition," 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Decoding semantic representations in mind and brain," 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Evidence for a deep, distributed and dynamic code for animacy in human ventral anterior temporal cortex," 2021, eLife
  • "Automated stress detection using mobile application and wearable sensors improves symptoms of mental health disorders in military personnel," 2022, Frontiers in Digital Health
  • "Finding Distributed Needles in Neural Haystacks," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators include Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, Kushin Mukherjee, Siddharth Suresh, Yun-Shiuan Chuang, and Christopher R. Cox, indicating a network of partnerships that contribute to interdisciplinary approaches within and beyond neuroscience.

Rogers frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Memory & Cognition

Their scientific work focuses within the broad domains of neuroscience and computer science, with particular emphasis on subfields including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Best Publications

  • Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain.

    Karalyn Patterson;Peter J. Nestor;Timothy T. Rogers

  • The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Elizabeth Jefferies;Karalyn Patterson;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach

    Timothy T. Rogers;James L. McClelland

  • The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition

    James L. McClelland;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.

    Timothy T. Rogers;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Peter Garrard;Sasha Bozeat

  • Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition

    James L. McClelland;Matthew M. Botvinick;David C. Noelle;David C. Plaut

  • Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure

    Anna C Schapiro;Timothy T Rogers;Natalia I Cordova;Nicholas B Turk-Browne

  • Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.

    Paul Hoffman;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Lichtheim 2: Synthesizing Aphasia and the Neural Basis of Language in a Neurocomputational Model of the Dual Dorsal-Ventral Language Pathways

    Taiji Ueno;Satoru Saito;Satoru Saito;Timothy T. Rogers;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory : Reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging

    Timothy T. Rogers;Julia Hocking;Uta Noppeney;Andrea Mechelli

  • Neural Basis of Category-Specific Semantic Deficits for Living Things: Evidence From Semantic Dementia, HSVE and a Neural Network Model

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Christine Lowe;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Semantic dementia and fluent primary progressive aphasia: two sides of the same coin?

    Anna-Lynne R. Adlam;K. Patterson;T. T. Rogers;P. J. Nestor

  • Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe

    Morgan D. Barense;Timothy J. Bussey;Andy C. H. Lee;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Human hippocampal replay during rest prioritizes weakly learned information and predicts memory performance

    Anna C. Schapiro;Elizabeth A. McDevitt;Timothy T. Rogers;Sara C. Mednick

  • COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib prevents chronic morphine-induced promotion of angiogenesis, tumour growth, metastasis and mortality, without compromising analgesia

    M Farooqui;Y Li;T Rogers;T Poonawala

  • Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage.

    Timothy T. Rogers;Karalyn Patterson

  • A unified model of human semantic knowledge and its disorders.

    Lang Chen;Lang Chen;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Presemantic Cognition in Semantic Dementia: Six Deficits in Search of an Explanation

    Karalyn Patterson;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Elizabeth Jefferies;Anna Woollams

  • Semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease and the frontotemporal dementias: A longitudinal study of 236 patients

    Timothy T. Rogers;Adrian Ivanoiu;Karalyn Patterson;John R. Hodges

  • Precis of Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach

    Timothy T. Rogers;James L. McClelland

  • Parallel Distributed Processing at 25: further explorations in the microstructure of cognition.

    Timothy T. Rogers;James L. McClelland

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph University of Cambridge
Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Xiaojin Zhu
Xiaojin Zhu University of Wisconsin–Madison
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Charles W. Kalish
Charles W. Kalish University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert Nowak
Robert Nowak University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kim S. Graham
Kim S. Graham Cardiff University
John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Elizabeth Jefferies
Elizabeth Jefferies University of York
Kenneth A. Norman
Kenneth A. Norman Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring Neuroscience in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth considering. Interdisciplinary fields like psychology, therapy, and social work often provide flexible, affordable study options for students looking to broaden their expertise or pursue new professional directions.

For those interested in family dynamics and mental health counseling, earning an lmft degree online can open the door to licensure in marriage and family therapy. Alternatively, expanding your knowledge with an online masters in psychology can lead to careers in clinical research, counseling, or human services.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. If affordability is a top priority, explore the cheapest online psychology degree options to find accredited programs that fit your budget. Additionally, aspiring social workers can advance their qualifications quickly via the msw online degree programs, which range from clinical practice to community outreach roles.

These pathways offer flexibility and diverse career prospects—all accessible through convenient online education.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy T. Rogers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles