World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
7960
World Ranking
7801
National Ranking
3350

Sara C. Mednick publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara C. Mednick sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 179 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sara C. Mednick D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara C. Mednick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sara C. Mednick is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Neuroscience, with significant contributions to Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Physiology.

Mednick's scholarly work addresses several core topics, including:

  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin

The scientist has published extensively, with notable papers such as:

  • The effect of zolpidem on memory consolidation over a night of sleep, 2020, SLEEP
  • Massive online data annotation, crowdsourcing to generate high quality sleep spindle annotations from EEG data, 2020, Scientific Data
  • The role of sleep for episodic memory consolidation: Stabilizing or rescuing?, 2022, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Age-related losses in cardiac autonomic activity during a daytime nap, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • Slow oscillations promote long-range effective communication: The key for memory consolidation in a broken-down network, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent coauthors working alongside Mednick include:

  • Katharine Simon
  • Lauren N. Whitehurst
  • Negin Sattari
  • Paola Malerba
  • Pin-Chun Chen

The scientist's research has been disseminated through multiple publication venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • SLEEP
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Brain stimulation

Best Publications

  • Sleep-dependent learning: a nap is as good as a night.

    Sara Mednick;Ken Nakayama;Robert Stickgold

  • REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks

    Denise J. Cai;Sarnoff A. Mednick;Elizabeth M. Harrison;Jennifer C. Kanady

  • The neural basis of the psychomotor vigilance task.

    Sean P. A. Drummond;Amanda Bischoff-Grethe;Amanda Bischoff-Grethe;David F. Dinges;Liat Ayalon;Liat Ayalon

  • The restorative effect of naps on perceptual deterioration.

    Sara C. Mednick;Ken Nakayama;Jose L. Cantero;Mercedes Atienza

  • Nighttime temperature and human sleep loss in a changing climate

    Nick Obradovich;Nick Obradovich;Robyn Migliorini;Robyn Migliorini;Sara C. Mednick;James H. Fowler

  • The Critical Role of Sleep Spindles in Hippocampal-Dependent Memory: A Pharmacology Study

    Sara C Mednick;Elizabeth A McDevitt;James K Walsh;James K Walsh;Erin J Wamsley

  • An opportunistic theory of cellular and systems consolidation.

    Sara C. Mednick;Denise J. Cai;Tristan Shuman;Stephan Anagnostaras

  • Human hippocampal replay during rest prioritizes weakly learned information and predicts memory performance

    Anna C. Schapiro;Elizabeth A. McDevitt;Timothy T. Rogers;Sara C. Mednick

  • Personality and healthy sleep: the importance of conscientiousness and neuroticism.

    Katherine A. Duggan;Howard S. Friedman;Elizabeth A. McDevitt;Sara C. Mednick

  • Comparing the benefits of caffeine, naps and placebo on verbal, motor and perceptual memory.

    Sara C. Mednick;Denise J. Cai;Jennifer Kanady;Sean P.A. Drummond

  • Synaptic clustering within dendrites: an emerging theory of memory formation.

    George Kastellakis;Denise J. Cai;Sara C. Mednick;Alcino J. Silva

  • Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults.

    Nicola Cellini;Matthew P. Buman;Elizabeth A. McDevitt;Ashley A. Ricker

  • Pharmacologically increasing sleep spindles enhances recognition for negative and high-arousal memories

    Erik J. Kaestner;John T. Wixted;Sara C. Mednick

  • Coupling of Thalamocortical Sleep Oscillations Are Important for Memory Consolidation in Humans

    Mohammad Niknazar;Giri P. Krishnan;Maxim Bazhenov;Sara C. Mednick

  • The Road Not Taken Creative Solutions Require Avoidance of High-Frequency Responses

    Nitin Gupta;Yoonhee Jang;Sara C. Mednick;David E. Huber

  • Actigraphic assessment of a polysomnographic-recorded nap: a validation study.

    Jennifer C. Kanady;Sean P. A. Drummond;Sean P. A. Drummond;Sean P. A. Drummond;Sara C. Mednick;Sara C. Mednick

  • Sleep Benefits Memory for Semantic Category Structure While Preserving Exemplar-Specific Information

    Anna C. Schapiro;Elizabeth A. McDevitt;Lang Chen;Kenneth A. Norman

  • REM sleep rescues learning from interference.

    Elizabeth A. McDevitt;Katherine A. Duggan;Sara C. Mednick

  • The time course and specificity of perceptual deterioration.

    Sara C. Mednick;A. Cyrus Arman;Geoffrey M. Boynton

  • Sleep and rest facilitate implicit memory in a visual search task.

    S. C. Mednick;T. Makovski;D. J. Cai;Yuhong V Jiang

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicola Cellini
Nicola Cellini University of Padua
Sean P.A. Drummond
Sean P.A. Drummond Monash University
Maxim Bazhenov
Maxim Bazhenov University of California, San Diego
Geoffrey M. Boynton
Geoffrey M. Boynton University of Washington
Fiona C. Baker
Fiona C. Baker SRI International
Timothy T. Rogers
Timothy T. Rogers University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kenneth A. Norman
Kenneth A. Norman Princeton University
Robert Stickgold
Robert Stickgold Harvard Medical School
Ken Nakayama
Ken Nakayama Harvard University
Michael P. Weisend
Michael P. Weisend Mind Research Network

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn’t have to stop at the lab. Today, online education offers flexible paths for students and professionals seeking to advance their careers—whether you're interested in research, healthcare, or technology. Many choose neuroscience as it connects to some of the highest paying jobs in fields like biotech, pharmaceuticals, and data science.

For those concerned about cost, there are fafsa approved online colleges that provide quality education with financial aid opportunities, making a neuroscience degree more accessible than ever.

If you’re looking to boost your resume or learn practical skills quickly, consider enrolling in online courses with certificates. These can open doors in specialized areas such as neurotechnology, cognitive science, or medical research.

Additionally, online classes for adults cater to busy professionals or those returning to education, often with flexible schedules and pacing options. These pathways are ideal for balancing current work or family commitments while preparing for new opportunities in neuroscience and related domains.

Best Scientists Citing Sara C. Mednick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles