World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 60 3100 2936 1355 1271 250 30789

John C. Detter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John C. Detter between 1996 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John C. Detter published across 22 years, from 1996 to 2017, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2011. 3 of the 254 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2011. 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 48 publications 2011: 54 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication
1996 2017

254 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John C. Detter: publications per year, 1996 to 2017
Year Publications
1996 4
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 3
2003 1
2004 7
2005 5
2006 4
2007 6
2008 3
2009 35
2010 48
2011 54
2012 28
2013 34
2014 10
2015 3
2016 2
2017 1
Total 254
Download as CSV

John C. Detter publications per year - data summary

  • John C. Detter, a Genetics scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, has 254 publications recorded across 22 years, from 1996 to 2017.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2017.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 54 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998, 1999, 2003 and 2017, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 22 years in the span carries no publications at all (2001).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.1 per year counting only the 21 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2013-2017) hold 50 publications, 20% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2003: 14 publications (1.8 per year); 2004-2011: 162 publications (20.3 per year); 2012-2017: 78 publications (13.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

John C. Detter publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Detter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 245–254 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 250 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114 250
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

John C. Detter publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • John C. Detter, a Genetics scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 250 publications - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than John C. Detter, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and John C. Detter ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

John C. Detter D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Detter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175 60
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

John C. Detter D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • John C. Detter, a Genetics scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 60 D-Index - the 29th percentile of the discipline.
  • 29% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than John C. Detter, and about 71% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and John C. Detter ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

John C. Detter is affiliated with the Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States. The scientist's professional background is centered around research conducted at this institution.

No recent papers with titles, publication years, or venues are listed for John C. Detter. Likewise, there is no available data on frequent co-authors or common publication venues associated with their research activities.

The scientist's work does not have specified main fields of study, subfields of study, or main topics of research according to the available data.

There is no information on book publications or specific awards received by John C. Detter.

John C. Detter is currently living, and their research contributions are linked with their role at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Best Publications

  • The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray)

    G. A. Tuskan;G. A. Tuskan;S. DiFazio;S. DiFazio;S. Jansson;J. Bohlmann

  • The Genome of the Diatom Thalassiosira Pseudonana: Ecology, Evolution, and Metabolism

    E. Virginia Armbrust;John A. Berges;Chris Bowler;Beverley R. Green

  • Comparative Metagenomics of Microbial Communities

    Susannah Green Tringe;Christian von Mering;Arthur Kobayashi;Asaf A. Salamov

  • The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes

    Chris Bowler;Andrew E. Allen;Andrew E. Allen;Jonathan H. Badger;Jane Grimwood

  • The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex

    John K. Colbourne;Michael E. Pfrender;Michael E. Pfrender;Donald Gilbert;W. Kelley Thomas

  • The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis

    F. Martin;A. Aerts;D. Ahrén;A. Brun

  • Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP78

    Diego Martinez;Luis F Larrondo;Nik Putnam;Nik Putnam;Maarten D Sollewijn Gelpke

  • Three Genomes from the Phylum Acidobacteria Provide Insight into the Lifestyles of These Microorganisms in Soils

    Naomi L. Ward;Jean F. Challacombe;Jean F. Challacombe;Peter H. Janssen;Peter H. Janssen;Bernard Henrissat

  • The genome of the western clawed frog xenopus tropicalis

    Uffe Hellsten;Richard M. Harland;Michael J. Gilchrist;David Hendrix

  • Reverse methanogenesis: testing the hypothesis with environmental genomics.

    Steven J. Hallam;Nik Putnam;Christina M. Preston;John C. Detter

  • Identification of the homologous beige and Chediak–Higashi syndrome genes

    Maria D. F. S. Barbosa;Quan A. Nguyen;Velizar T. Tchernev;Jennifer A. Ashley

  • Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a and pv. tomato DC3000

    Helene Feil;William S. Feil;Patrick Chain;Frank Larimer

  • Genome Project Standards in a New Era of Sequencing

    P. S. G. Chain;D. V. Grafham;R. S. Fulton;M. G. FitzGerald

  • Comparative genomics reveals mechanism for short-term and long-term clonal transitions in pandemic Vibrio cholerae.

    Jongsik Chun;Christopher J. Grim;Nur A. Hasan;Je Hee Lee

  • The DNA sequence and biology of human chromosome 19

    Jane Grimwood;Laurie A. Gordon;Laurie A. Gordon;Anne Olsen;Anne Olsen;Astrid Terry

  • The complete genome sequence of Moorella thermoacetica (f. Clostridium thermoaceticum).

    Elizabeth Pierce;Gary Xie;Gary Xie;Ravi D. Barabote;Ravi D. Barabote;Elizabeth Saunders;Elizabeth Saunders

  • Genomic Sequencing of Pleistocene Cave Bears

    James P. Noonan;Michael Hofreiter;Doug Smith;James R. Priest

  • Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea: Sequencing a Myriad of Type Strains

    Nikos C. Kyrpides;Philip Hugenholtz;Jonathan A. Eisen;Tanja Woyke

  • Genome sequence of the cellulolytic gliding bacterium Cytophaga hutchinsonii.

    Gary Xie;Gary Xie;David C. Bruce;David C. Bruce;Jean F. Challacombe;Jean F. Challacombe;Olga Chertkov;Olga Chertkov

  • The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) - eScholarship

    G.A. Tuskan;S. DiFazio;S. Jansson;J. Bohlmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynne Goodwin
Lynne Goodwin Los Alamos National Laboratory
Miriam Land
Miriam Land Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Cliff Han
Cliff Han Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jonathan A. Eisen
Jonathan A. Eisen University of California, Davis
Loren Hauser
Loren Hauser Digital Infuzion (United States)
Philip Hugenholtz
Philip Hugenholtz University of Queensland
Alla Lapidus
Alla Lapidus Saint Petersburg State University
Nikos C. Kyrpides
Nikos C. Kyrpides Joint Genome Institute
Natalia Ivanova
Natalia Ivanova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
David Bruce
David Bruce Pebble Labs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens several diverse and rewarding career paths, especially in the fast-growing healthcare sector. Many students consider bridging genetics with hands-on patient care by pursuing nursing programs. Today, options like nursing school without entrance exam offer an accessible entry point, eliminating common test barriers.

For those interested in accelerated learning, a 10 month lpn program can provide a quick path into practical nursing and support further specialization in genetics or related fields. If healthcare leadership calls to you, consider mha online programs which prepare graduates for strategic administrative roles—even within genetics research or biotech organizations.

Advanced learners aiming to influence education or research may look to an online doctorate in nursing as a flexible path to expertise. Whichever direction you choose, these related online degrees support dynamic growth in genetics and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Detter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles