World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 59 3225 3051 1401 1315 358 14901

Lynne Goodwin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lynne Goodwin between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lynne Goodwin published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 84 publications in 2011. 3 of the 381 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 84. Peak 84 publications in 2011. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 60 publications 2011: 84 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 75 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1995 2025

381 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lynne Goodwin: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 32
2010 60
2011 84
2012 46
2013 75
2014 24
2015 15
2016 3
2017 7
2018 3
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 381
Download as CSV

Lynne Goodwin publications per year - data summary

  • Lynne Goodwin, a Genetics scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, has 381 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 84 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995, 1996, 2005 and 2024, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 31 years in the span carry no publications at all (1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.9 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 11 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 5 publications (0.5 per year); 2006-2016: 346 publications (31.5 per year); 2017-2025: 30 publications (3.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Lynne Goodwin publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne Goodwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 355–364 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 358 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48 358
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Lynne Goodwin publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Lynne Goodwin, a Genetics scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 358 publications - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Lynne Goodwin, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Lynne Goodwin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Lynne Goodwin D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne Goodwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162 59
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Lynne Goodwin D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Lynne Goodwin, a Genetics scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 59 D-Index - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Lynne Goodwin, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Lynne Goodwin ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

Lynne Goodwin is affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a focus on several subfields including Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, and Geophysics.

Their work covers a range of main topics such as:

  • Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
  • Fusion materials and technologies
  • Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Nuclear Physics and Applications
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology

Goodwin has authored multiple papers that showcase the diversity of their research interests. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Experimental quantification of the impact of heterogeneous mix on thermonuclear burn" (2022) published in Physics of Plasmas
  • "Detrimental effects and mitigation of the joint feature in double shell implosion simulations" (2021) published in Physics of Plasmas
  • "A temperature profile diagnostic for radiation waves on OMEGA-60" (2021) published in High Energy Density Physics
  • "Material Characterization of Hierarchical Tunable Pore Size Polymer Foams Used in the MARBLE Mix Morphology Experiment" (2020) published in Fusion Science & Technology
  • "One Complete and Seven Draft Genome Sequences of Subdivision 1 and 3 Acidobacteria Isolated from Soil" (2020) published in Microbiology Resource Announcements

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Physics of Plasmas and Fusion Science & Technology, each featuring three of their works. Other venues include Microbiology Resource Announcements, High Energy Density Physics, and ESMO Open.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Tana Morrow
  • Brian M. Patterson
  • D. W. Schmidt
  • T. E. Quintana
  • R. B. Randolph

Best Publications

  • A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

    Dongying Wu;Dongying Wu;Philip Hugenholtz;Konstantinos Mavromatis;Rüdiger Pukall

  • Improving the coverage of the cyanobacterial phylum using diversity-driven genome sequencing

    Patrick M. Shih;Patrick M. Shih;Dongying Wu;Amel Latifi;Seth D. Axen

  • Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083(T), the type strain (U5/41(T)) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy.

    Jan P. Meier-Kolthoff;Richard L. Hahnke;Jörn Petersen;Carmen Scheuner

  • Pathogenomic Sequence Analysis of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis Isolates Closely Related to Bacillus anthracis

    Cliff S. Han;Gary Xie;Jean F. Challacombe;Michael R. Altherr

  • The complete genome sequence of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 reveals a cellulolytic and metabolic specialist.

    Garret Suen;Paul J. Weimer;David M. Stevenson;Frank O. Aylward;Frank O. Aylward

  • An insect herbivore microbiome with high plant biomass-degrading capacity.

    Garret Suen;Jarrod J. Scott;Jarrod J. Scott;Jarrod J. Scott;Frank O. Aylward;Frank O. Aylward;Sandra M. Adams;Sandra M. Adams

  • Complete Genome Sequence of the Metabolically Versatile Plant Growth-Promoting Endophyte Variovorax paradoxus S110

    Jong In Han;Hong Kyu Choi;Seung Won Lee;Paul M. Orwin

  • Comparative genomics of freshwater Fe-oxidizing bacteria: implications for physiology, ecology, and systematics.

    David Emerson;Erin K. Field;Olga Chertkov;Karen W. Davenport

  • Comparison of 26 Sphingomonad Genomes Reveals Diverse Environmental Adaptations and Biodegradative Capabilities

    Frank O. Aylward;Bradon R. McDonald;Sandra M. Adams;Sandra M. Adams;Alejandra Valenzuela;Alejandra Valenzuela

  • The sequence and analysis of duplication-rich human chromosome 16

    Joel Martin;Cliff Han;Laurie A. Gordon;Astrid Terry

  • The fast changing landscape of sequencing technologies and their impact on microbial genome assemblies and annotation.

    Konstantinos Mavromatis;Miriam L. Land;Thomas S. Brettin;Daniel J. Quest

  • Cellulose-degrading bacteria associated with the invasive woodwasp Sirex noctilio

    Aaron S Adams;Michelle S Jordan;Michelle S Jordan;Sandye M Adams;Garret Suen;Garret Suen

  • Metagenomic and metaproteomic insights into bacterial communities in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens

    Frank O Aylward;Kristin E Burnum;Jarrod J Scott;Jarrod J Scott;Jarrod J Scott;Garret Suen;Garret Suen

  • An integrated physical map of human chromosome 16.

    N A Doggett;L A Goodwin;J G Tesmer;L J Meincke

  • Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T)

    David Sims;Thomas Brettin;Thomas Brettin;John C. Detter;Cliff Han

  • Genome of Methylobacillus flagellatus, Molecular Basis for Obligate Methylotrophy, and Polyphyletic Origin of Methylotrophy

    Ludmila Chistoserdova;Alla Lapidus;Cliff Han;Lynne Goodwin

  • Leucoagaricus gongylophorus produces diverse enzymes for the degradation of recalcitrant plant polymers in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens.

    Frank O. Aylward;Kristin E. Burnum-Johnson;Susannah G. Tringe;Clotilde Teiling

  • Genome sequence of the obligate methanotroph Methylosinus trichosporium strain OB3b

    Lisa Y. Stein;Sukhwan Yoon;Jeremy D. Semrau;Alan A. DiSpirito

  • Exploring the symbiotic pangenome of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti

    Marco Galardini;Alessio Mengoni;Matteo Brilli;Francesco Pini

  • Comparison of 26 Sphingomonad Genomes Reveals Diverse Environmental

    Frank O. Aylward;Bradon R. McDonald;Sandra M. Adams;Alejandra Valenzuela

Frequent Co-Authors

Miriam Land
Miriam Land Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Cliff Han
Cliff Han Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jonathan A. Eisen
Jonathan A. Eisen University of California, Davis
John C. Detter
John C. Detter Los Alamos National Laboratory
Loren Hauser
Loren Hauser Digital Infuzion (United States)
Nikos C. Kyrpides
Nikos C. Kyrpides Joint Genome Institute
Natalia Ivanova
Natalia Ivanova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Philip Hugenholtz
Philip Hugenholtz University of Queensland
Alla Lapidus
Alla Lapidus Saint Petersburg State University
David Bruce
David Bruce Pebble Labs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can open doors to various healthcare careers, many of which benefit from advanced scientific and clinical knowledge. If you’re interested in applied sciences or want to work in a clinical setting, pursuing a nursing degree alongside genetics can expand your opportunities.

Numerous affordable online programs make this possible. For those aiming for an advanced healthcare role, consider the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs, which equip students with specialized skills to diagnose and treat patients. If you’re just starting out, explore online nursing degree programs to build a strong foundation in patient care, anatomy, and health systems.

Professionals seeking leadership roles in healthcare might benefit from the most affordable dnp programs, which focus on advanced practice and research. Registered nurses looking to enhance their qualifications can opt for the cheapest rn to bsn online, helping bridge clinical skills with deeper scientific learning such as genetics.

Combining genetics with nursing expertise can lead to rewarding pathways in research, genetic counseling, personalized medicine, and advanced clinical practice. Online learning makes these career expansions more accessible and affordable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Lynne Goodwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles