World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ludmila Chistoserdova

Ludmila Chistoserdova

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
11320
World Ranking
12085
National Ranking
5176

Ludmila Chistoserdova publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ludmila Chistoserdova sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 137 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ludmila Chistoserdova D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ludmila Chistoserdova sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ludmila Chistoserdova is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work includes significant contributions to the subfields of Ecology, Molecular Biology, Environmental Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, and Inorganic Chemistry.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas such as:

  • Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Chistoserdova has published papers in various scientific venues, with repeated contributions to Nature Communications. Other publication venues include Environmental Science & Technology Letters, Environmental Science & Technology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Microorganisms.

Recent notable papers include:

  • "Methane-Dependent Mineral Reduction by Aerobic Methanotrophs under Hypoxia," 2020, Environmental Science & Technology Letters
  • "Ecology and molecular targets of hypermutation in the global microbiome," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Coupled Aerobic Methane Oxidation and Arsenate Reduction Contributes to Soil-Arsenic Mobilization in Agricultural Fields," 2022, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Electrochemically coupled CH4 and CO2 consumption driven by microbial processes," 2024, Nature Communications
  • "Ecology and molecular targets of hypermutation in the global microbiome," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist collaborates frequently with researchers including Zheng Yu, Yue Zheng, Jing Huang, Baoli Zhu, and Jinhua Li. These collaborations have contributed to multiple publications across their main research topics and fields.

Best Publications

  • A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes

    Stephen Nayfach;Simon Roux;Rekha Seshadri;Daniel Udwary

  • The expanding world of methylotrophic metabolism.

    Ludmila Chistoserdova;Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya;Mary E. Lidstrom

  • Methylotrophy in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 from a genomic point of view.

    Ludmila Chistoserdova;Sung-Wei Chen;Alla Lapidus;Mary E. Lidstrom

  • C1 Transfer Enzymes and Coenzymes Linking Methylotrophic Bacteria and Methanogenic Archaea

    Ludmila Chistoserdova;Julia A. Vorholt;Rudolf K. Thauer;Mary E. Lidstrom

  • Modularity of methylotrophy, revisited.

    Ludmila Chistoserdova

  • High-resolution metagenomics targets specific functional types in complex microbial communities.

    Marina G Kalyuzhnaya;Alla Lapidus;Natalia Ivanova;Alex C Copeland

  • Bacterial Populations Active in Metabolism of C1 Compounds in the Sediment of Lake Washington, a Freshwater Lake

    Olivier Nercessian;Emma Noyes;Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya;Mary E. Lidstrom

  • Methylobacterium Genome Sequences: A Reference Blueprint to Investigate Microbial Metabolism of C1 Compounds from Natural and Industrial Sources

    Stéphane Vuilleumier;Ludmila Chistoserdova;Ming-Chun Lee;Françoise Bringel

  • 7 Aerobic Methylotrophic Prokaryotes

    Ludmila Chistoserdova;Mary E. Lidstrom

  • Lanthanide-dependent cross-feeding of methane-derived carbon is linked by microbial community interactions

    Sascha M. B. Krause;Timothy Johnson;Yasodara Samadhi Karunaratne;Yanfen Fu

  • A metagenomic insight into freshwater methane-utilizing communities and evidence for cooperation between the Methylococcaceae and the Methylophilaceae

    David A.C. Beck;Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya;Stephanie Malfatti;Stephanie Malfatti;Susannah G. Tringe

  • Distribution of tetrahydromethanopterin-dependent enzymes in methylotrophic bacteria and phylogeny of methenyl tetrahydromethanopterin cyclohydrolases.

    Julia A. Vorholt;Julia A. Vorholt;Ludmila Chistoserdova;Sergei M. Stolyar;Rudolf K. Thauer

  • Genetic organization of the mau gene cluster in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1: complete nucleotide sequence and generation and characteristics of mau mutants.

    Andrei Y. Chistoserdov;Ludmila V. Chistoserdova;William S. McIntire;Mary E. Lidstrom

  • Methylophilaceae link methanol oxidation to denitrification in freshwater lake sediment as suggested by stable isotope probing and pure culture analysis.

    Marina G. Kalyuhznaya;Willm Martens-Habbena;Tiansong Wang;Murray Hackett

  • Characterization of a Novel Methanol Dehydrogenase in Representatives of Burkholderiales : Implications for Environmental Detection of Methylotrophy and Evidence for Convergent Evolution

    Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya;Krassimira R. Hristova;Mary E. Lidstrom;Ludmila Chistoserdova

  • Plants in the Pink: Cytokinin Production by Methylobacterium

    Mary E. Lidstrom;Ludmila Chistoserdova

  • Methylotenera mobilis gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately methylamine-utilizing bacterium within the family Methylophilaceae.

    Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya;Sarah Bowerman;Jimmie C. Lara;Mary E. Lidstrom

  • Current Trends in Methylotrophy

    Ludmila Chistoserdova;Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya

  • Methylotrophs in natural habitats: current insights through metagenomics

    Ludmila Chistoserdova

  • Methane-fed microbial microcosms show differential community dynamics and pinpoint taxa involved in communal response.

    Igor Y. Oshkin;Igor Y. Oshkin;David A C Beck;Andrew E. Lamb;Veronika Tchesnokova

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary E. Lidstrom
Mary E. Lidstrom University of Washington
Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya
Marina G. Kalyuzhnaya San Diego State University
Tanja Woyke
Tanja Woyke Joint Genome Institute
Christopher J. Marx
Christopher J. Marx University of Idaho
Alla Lapidus
Alla Lapidus Saint Petersburg State University
Natalia Ivanova
Natalia Ivanova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Rudolf K. Thauer
Rudolf K. Thauer Max Planck Society
Claudine Médigue
Claudine Médigue University of Paris-Saclay
Jean Weissenbach
Jean Weissenbach Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse careers in healthcare, research, and wellness. With flexible study options, students can tailor their education to fit busy schedules or transition between fields.

For those pursuing entry into nursing, cma to lpn bridge program online options allow certified medical assistants to advance their clinical skills and credentials efficiently. If you’re considering foundational nursing education, asn online nursing programs offer a pathway to a fast-track nursing career with robust online coursework.

For a broader science background, enrolling in an online biology bachelor's degree provides training for roles in labs, biotech, and further graduate study. Alternatively, if your interest lies in health, diet, and public wellness, an online bachelor's in nutrition can prepare you for careers in nutrition counseling, food science, or health education.

These online programs make it easier than ever to begin or advance your science career on your own terms.

Best Scientists Citing Ludmila Chistoserdova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles