World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
France
2024
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
France
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
79
Citations
28649
World Ranking
1628
National Ranking
66

Claudine Médigue publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudine Médigue sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 162 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Claudine Médigue D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudine Médigue sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in France Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in France Leader Award

Overview

Claudine Médigue is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology with a particular emphasis on molecular biology as well as aspects of ecology, genetics, infectious diseases, and epidemiology.

The main topics of Médigue's scientific work include genomics and phylogenetic studies, bioinformatics and genomic networks, microbial metabolic engineering and bioproduction, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, bacterial genetics and biotechnology, machine learning applications in bioinformatics, and microbial community ecology and physiology.

Key recent papers authored by Médigue cover various aspects of microbial genomics and bioinformatics:

  • PPanGGOLiN: Depicting microbial diversity via a partitioned pangenome graph, 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • TbD1 deletion as a driver of the evolutionary success of modern epidemic Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages, 2020, Nature Communications
  • panRGP: a pangenome-based method to predict genomic islands and explore their diversity, 2020, Bioinformatics
  • A model industrial workhorse: Bacillus subtilis strain 168 and its genome after a quarter of a century, 2023, Microbial Biotechnology
  • ProMetIS, deep phenotyping of mouse models by combined proteomics and metabolomics analysis, 2021, Scientific Data

Médigue frequently publishes in journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), PLoS Computational Biology, F1000Research, Nature Communications, and Microbial Biotechnology. These venues reflect a focus on computational biology, bioinformatics, and microbial biotechnology.

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, notably David Vallenet, Alexandra Calteau, Adelme Bazin, Guillaume Gautreau, and Bérénice Batut, reflecting a collaborative approach in their research endeavors.

Best Publications

  • The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis

    F. Kunst;N. Ogasawara;I. Moszer;A. M. Albertini

  • Deciphering the evolution and metabolism of an anammox bacterium from a community genome

    Marc Strous;Eric Pelletier;Sophie Mangenot;Thomas Rattei

  • Organised Genome Dynamics in the Escherichia coli Species Results in Highly Diverse Adaptive Paths

    Marie Touchon;Marie Touchon;Claire Hoede;Olivier Tenaillon;Valérie Barbe

  • Re-annotation of the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

    Jean-Christophe Camus;Melinda J. Pryor;Claudine Médigue;Stewart T. Cole

  • Insights into the evolution of Yersinia pestis through whole-genome comparison with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis

    P. S G Chain;E. Carniel;F. W. Larimer;J. Lamerdin

  • The genome sequence of the entomopathogenic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens

    Eric Duchaud;Christophe Rusniok;Lionel Frangeul;Carmen Buchrieser

  • Legumes Symbioses: Absence of Nod Genes in Photosynthetic Bradyrhizobia

    Eric Giraud;Lionel Moulin;David Vallenet;Valérie Barbe

  • Tempo and mode of genome evolution in a 50,000-generation experiment

    Olivier Tenaillon;Jeffrey E. Barrick;Jeffrey E. Barrick;Noah Ribeck;Daniel E. Deatherage

  • Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation.

    C. Médigue;T. Rouxel;P. Vigier;A. Hénaut

  • From a consortium sequence to a unified sequence: The Bacillus subtilis 168 reference genome a decade later

    Valérie Barbe;Stéphane Cruveiller;Frank Kunst;Patricia Lenoble

  • Coping with cold: The genome of the versatile marine Antarctica bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125

    Claudine Médigue;Evelyne Krin;Géraldine Pascal;Valérie Barbe

  • MaGe: a microbial genome annotation system supported by synteny results

    David Vallenet;Laurent Labarre;Zoé Rouy;Valérie Barbe

  • Unique features revealed by the genome sequence of Acinetobacter sp. ADP1, a versatile and naturally transformation competent bacterium

    Valérie Barbe;David Vallenet;Nuria Fonknechten;Annett Kreimeyer

  • Genome characteristics of facultatively symbiotic Frankia sp. strains reflect host range and host plant biogeography.

    Philippe Normand;Pascal Lapierre;Louis S. Tisa;Johann Peter Gogarten

  • Genome Sequence of the Saprophyte Leptospira biflexa Provides Insights into the Evolution of Leptospira and the Pathogenesis of Leptospirosis

    Mathieu Picardeau;Dieter Mark Bulach;Dieter Mark Bulach;Christiane Bouchier;Richard L Zuerner

  • MicroScope—an integrated microbial resource for the curation and comparative analysis of genomic and metabolic data

    David Vallenet;Eugeni Belda;Alexandra Calteau;Stéphane Cruveiller

  • Comparative Analysis of Acinetobacters: Three Genomes for Three Lifestyles

    David Vallenet;Patrice Nordmann;Valérie Barbe;Laurent Poirel

  • “Candidatus Cloacamonas Acidaminovorans”: Genome Sequence Reconstruction Provides a First Glimpse of a New Bacterial Division

    Eric Pelletier;Annett Kreimeyer;Stéphanie Bocs;Zoé Rouy

  • A complete collection of single‐gene deletion mutants of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1

    Véronique de Berardinis;David Vallenet;Vanina Castelli;Marielle Besnard

  • Insights into the genome evolution of Yersinia pestis through whole genome comparison with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis

    B Souza;P Stoutland;A Derbise;A Georgescu

Frequent Co-Authors

David Vallenet
David Vallenet University of Paris-Saclay
Antoine Danchin
Antoine Danchin Institut Cochin
Valérie Barbe
Valérie Barbe Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean Weissenbach
Jean Weissenbach Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Philippe Normand
Philippe Normand Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Olivier Tenaillon
Olivier Tenaillon Université Paris Cité
Erick Denamur
Erick Denamur Université Paris Cité
Alla Lapidus
Alla Lapidus Saint Petersburg State University
Eduardo P. C. Rocha
Eduardo P. C. Rocha Institut Pasteur
Christiane Bouchier
Christiane Bouchier Institut Pasteur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens doors to a range of related healthcare programs you can pursue online. Many students interested in genetics also look into nursing and allied health degrees, which provide flexible learning paths and strong job prospects.

For those with a nursing background, rn to bsn online programs let you earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing without the need for additional clinical hours, making career advancement more convenient. Likewise, licensed nurses looking to reach the highest level in their profession might be interested in shortest dnp programs online or compare their options through the dnp program listings.

For newcomers to healthcare, pursuing a medical assistant course can be an excellent, quick-entry pathway — sometimes taking as little as six weeks. These related programs can help build foundational knowledge that supports future work or study in the field of genetics, and they offer clear routes into rewarding, in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Claudine Médigue

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles