World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 77 1360 1226 65 59 298 19589

Jan Maarten van Dijl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Maarten van Dijl between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Maarten van Dijl published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 27 of the 338 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 15 publications
1984 2025

338 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Maarten van Dijl: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 5
1998 5
1999 8
2000 6
2001 6
2002 5
2003 6
2004 6
2005 4
2006 9
2007 4
2008 11
2009 12
2010 9
2011 12
2012 18
2013 19
2014 15
2015 17
2016 12
2017 10
2018 13
2019 13
2020 17
2021 24
2022 16
2023 15
2024 12
2025 15
Total 338
Download as CSV

Jan Maarten van Dijl publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Maarten van Dijl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 295–304 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 298 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96 298
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Jan Maarten van Dijl D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Maarten van Dijl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60 77
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Maarten van Dijl is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a total of 200 publications distributed between these fields. Subfields of study in their work include Molecular Biology, Surgery, Genetics, Infectious Diseases, and Ecology.

The scientist's main research topics cover bacterial genetics and biotechnology, antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus species, bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing, bacteriophages and microbial interactions, orthopedic infections and treatments, antibiotic resistance in bacteria, and infective endocarditis diagnosis and management.

Frequent publication venues for van Dijl include the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Microbiology Spectrum, Scientific Reports, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and ACS Synthetic Biology.

Recent published papers showcase a focus on microbiological and molecular topics, including:

  • Staphylococcal trafficking and infection-from 'nose to gut' and back, 2021, FEMS Microbiology Reviews
  • Staphylococcus aureus cell wall maintenance - the multifaceted roles of peptidoglycan hydrolases in bacterial growth, fitness, and virulence, 2022, FEMS Microbiology Reviews
  • Targeted optical fluorescence imaging: a meta-narrative review and future perspectives, 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Microbial protein cell factories fight back?, 2021, Trends in biotechnology
  • Recombinant protein secretion by Bacillus subtilis and Lactococcus lactis: pathways, applications, and innovation potential, 2021, Essays in Biochemistry

Jan Maarten van Dijl has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Dörte Becher, Marleen van Oosten, Girbe Buist, Marina López-Álvarez, and Sandra Maaß. These collaborations appear regularly in their scientific outputs, supporting an interdisciplinary approach across microbiology and molecular biology research.

Best Publications

  • Signal Peptide-Dependent Protein Transport in Bacillus subtilis : a Genome-Based Survey of the Secretome

    Harold Tjalsma;Albert Bolhuis;Jan D. H. Jongbloed;Sierd Bron

  • Condition-Dependent Transcriptome Reveals High-Level Regulatory Architecture in Bacillus subtilis

    Pierre Nicolas;Ulrike Mäder;Etienne Dervyn;Tatiana Rochat

  • Proteomics of Protein Secretion by Bacillus subtilis: Separating the “Secrets” of the Secretome

    H Tjalsma;H. Antelmann;Jan Jongbloed;Peter Braun

  • Bacillus subtilis: from soil bacterium to super-secreting cell factory.

    Jan Maarten van Dijl;Michael Hecker

  • A Proteomic View on Genome-Based Signal Peptide Predictions

    Haike Antelmann;Harold Tjalsma;Birgit Voigt;Steffen Ohlmeier

  • Global Network Reorganization During Dynamic Adaptations of Bacillus subtilis Metabolism

    Joerg Martin Buescher;Wolfram Liebermeister;Matthieu Jules;Markus Uhr

  • The gut anaerobe Faecalibacterium prausnitzii uses an extracellular electron shuttle to grow at oxic-anoxic interphases

    M. Tanweer Khan;Sylvia H. Duncan;Alfons J. M. Stams;Jan Maarten van Dijl

  • ATP-dependent proteases that also chaperone protein biogenesis

    CK Suzuki;M Rep;van Jan Maarten Dijl;K Suda

  • Real-time in vivo imaging of invasive- and biomaterial-associated bacterial infections using fluorescently labelled vancomycin

    Marleen van Oosten;Marleen van Oosten;Tina Schäfer;Joost A C Gazendam;Knut Ohlsen

  • Genome Engineering Reveals Large Dispensable Regions in Bacillus subtilis

    Helga Westers;Ronald Dorenbos;Jan Maarten van Dijl;Jorrit Kabel

  • Identification of VceA and VceC, two members of the VjbR regulon that are translocated into macrophages by the Brucella type IV secretion system

    Maarten F. De Jong;Yao Hui Sun;Andreas B. Den Hartigh;Jan Maarten Van Dijl

  • Two minimal Tat translocases in Bacillus

    Jan D. H. Jongbloed;Ulrike Grieger;Haike Antelmann;Michael Hecker

  • A novel class of heat and secretion stress-responsive genes is controlled by the autoregulated CssRS two-component system of Bacillus subtilis.

    Elise Darmon;David Noone;Anne Masson;Sierd Bron

  • Rhodomyrtone: A new candidate as natural antibacterial drug from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa

    Surasak Limsuwan;Erik N. Trip;Thijs R. H. M. Kouwen;Sjouke Piersma

  • Post-translocational folding of secretory proteins in Gram-positive bacteria

    Matti Sarvas;Colin R. Harwood;Sierd Bron;Jan Maarten van Dijl

  • Staphylococcus aureus Transcriptome Architecture: From Laboratory to Infection-Mimicking Conditions

    Ulrike Mäder;Pierre Nicolas;Maren Depke;Jan Pané-Farré

  • Functional analysis of the secretory precursor processing machinery of Bacillus subtilis: identification of a eubacterial homolog of archaeal and eukaryotic signal peptidases

    Harold Tjalsma;Albert Bolhuis;Maarten L. van Roosmalen;Thomas Wiegert

  • Type I signal peptidases of Gram-positive bacteria

    Maarten L. van Roosmalen;Nick Geukens;Jan D.H. Jongbloed;Harold Tjalsma

  • TatC Is a Specificity Determinant for Protein Secretion via the Twin-arginine Translocation Pathway

    Jan D.H. Jongbloed;Ulrike Martin;Haike Antelmann;Michael Hecker

  • Promotion of Mitochondrial Membrane Complex Assembly by a Proteolytically Inactive Yeast Lon

    M Rep;van Jan Maarten Dijl;K Suda;G Schatz

Frequent Co-Authors

Sierd Bron
Sierd Bron University of Groningen
Michael Hecker
Michael Hecker University of Greifswald
Girbe Buist
Girbe Buist University Medical Center Groningen
Haike Antelmann
Haike Antelmann Freie Universität Berlin
Wim J. Quax
Wim J. Quax University of Groningen
Dörte Becher
Dörte Becher University of Greifswald
Harold Tjalsma
Harold Tjalsma Radboud University
John W. A. Rossen
John W. A. Rossen University Medical Center Groningen
Uwe Völker
Uwe Völker University of Greifswald
Alexander W. Friedrich
Alexander W. Friedrich University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing microbiology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. One growing field is health information management, where professionals play a crucial role in handling healthcare data securely and efficiently. Understanding the health information management bachelor degree salary can help determine the financial outlook in this sector.

When considering online programs, it’s important to choose an accredited online health information management degree cahiim to ensure quality education and recognized credentials. This accreditation is vital for future employment opportunities and professional certifications.

Another popular option is specialized training in medical billing and coding. Programs like the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs provide a quick path into the healthcare administration field. These certificate programs can be especially appealing for those looking to enter the workforce promptly.

Lastly, students interested in further healthcare studies may explore a range of online medical programs. These options offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to balance education with other responsibilities while expanding career opportunities in the medical and scientific sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Maarten van Dijl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles