World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
10059
World Ranking
7082
National Ranking
3065

Cynthia G. Wible publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia G. Wible sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 85 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Cynthia G. Wible D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia G. Wible sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cynthia G. Wible is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily covers the fields of Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Recent publications by Cynthia G. Wible include:

  • Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network Recommendations for Prospective Multi-Center Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies, 2020, eScholarship (California Digital Library)
  • The Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network Data Repository, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Relating Intrinsic Low-Frequency BOLD Cortical Oscillations to Cognition in Schizophrenia, 2020, UNC Libraries

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Wible are:

  • Gary H. Glover
  • Bryon A. Mueller
  • Jessica A. Turner
  • Theo G.M. van Erp
  • Vince D. Calhoun

Frequently chosen venues for the publication of their work include UNC Libraries and eScholarship (California Digital Library).

Best Publications

  • Abnormalities of the left temporal lobe and thought disorder in schizophrenia. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Martha Elizabeth Shenton;Ron Kikinis;Ferenc A. Jolesz;Seth D. Pollak

  • MRI anatomy of schizophrenia.

    Robert William McCarley;Cynthia Gayle Wible;Melissa Frumin;Yoshio Hirayasu

  • Cingulate Fasciculus Integrity Disruption in Schizophrenia: A Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

    Marek R. Kubicki;Carl-Fredrik Westin;Paul Gerard Nestor;Cynthia Gayle Wible;Cynthia Gayle Wible

  • Is There a Special Flashbulb-Memory Mechanism?

    Michael McCloskey;Cynthia G. Wible;Neal J. Cohen

  • Working memory and DLPFC inefficiency in schizophrenia: The FBIRN study

    S. G. Potkin;J. A. Turner;G. G. Brown;G. McCarthy

  • Subgenual cingulate cortex volume in first-episode psychosis.

    Yoshio Hirayasu;Martha Elizabeth Shenton;Dean F. Salisbury;Jun Soo Kwon

  • A digital brain atlas for surgical planning, model-driven segmentation, and teaching

    R. Kikinis;M.E. Shenton;D.V. Iosifescu;R.W. McCarley

  • Learning-related patterns of CA1 spike trains parallel stimulation parameters optimal for inducing hippocampal long-term potentiation.

    Tim Otto;Howard Eichenbaum;Sidney I. Wiener;Cynthia G. Wible

  • Prefrontal cortex, negative symptoms, and schizophrenia: an MRI study.

    Cynthia G Wible;Jane Anderson;Martha E Shenton;Ashley Kricun

  • Dysregulation of working memory and default‐mode networks in schizophrenia using independent component analysis, an fBIRN and MCIC study

    Dae Il Kim;Dara S. Manoach;Daniel H. Mathalon;Jessica A. Turner

  • Function biomedical informatics research network recommendations for prospective multicenter functional MRI studies

    Gary H. Glover;Bryon A. Mueller;Jessica A. Turner;Jessica A. Turner;Theo G.M. Van Erp

  • Prefrontal Cortex and Schizophrenia: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Cynthia G. Wible;Martha E. Shenton;Hiroto Hokama;Ron Kikinis

  • Caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus volume in schizophrenia: A quantitative MRI study

    Hiroto Hokama;Martha E. Shenton;Paul G. Nestor;Ron Kikinis

  • Learning and memory

    Daniel L. Alkon;David G. Amaral;Mark F. Bear;Joel Black

  • Volumetric evaluation of the thalamus in schizophrenic male patients using magnetic resonance imaging.

    Chiara M Portas;Jill M Goldstein;Jill M Goldstein;Martha E Shenton;Hiroto H Hokama

  • Auditory Oddball Deficits in Schizophrenia: An Independent Component Analysis of the fMRI Multisite Function BIRN Study

    Dae Il Kim;D. H. Mathalon;J. M. Ford;M. Mannell

  • The Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network Data Repository.

    David B Keator;Theo G M van Erp;Jessica A Turner;Gary H Glover

  • Prefrontal Gray Matter Volume Reduction in First Episode Schizophrenia

    Y. Hirayasu;Shin Tanaka;Martha Elizabeth Shenton;Dean Salisbury

  • Differential memory changes with age: Exact retrieval versus plausible inference.

    Lynne M. Reder;Cynthia Wible;John Martin

  • Resting-state thalamic dysconnectivity in schizophrenia and relationships with symptoms.

    J. Ferri;J. M. Ford;B. J. Roach;J. A. Turner

  • Mnemonic correlates of unit activity in the hippocampus.

    Cynthia G. Wible;Robert L. Findling;Matthew Shapiro;Eric J. Lang

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert W. McCarley
Robert W. McCarley Harvard Medical School
Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis Brigham and Women's Hospital
Daniel H. Mathalon
Daniel H. Mathalon University of California, San Francisco
Ferenc A. Jolesz
Ferenc A. Jolesz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul G. Nestor
Paul G. Nestor University of Massachusetts Boston
Jessica A. Turner
Jessica A. Turner The Ohio State University
Steven G. Potkin
Steven G. Potkin University of California, Irvine
Aysenil Belger
Aysenil Belger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Daniel S. O'Leary
Daniel S. O'Leary University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA can open the door to a range of related online degrees and diverse career options. Many students interested in brain science also consider online programs in counseling, psychology, and therapy fields, due to their strong foundations in human behavior and mental health.

For those seeking to become licensed counselors, cacrep-accredited online counseling programs ensure rigorous standards and can lead to rewarding roles in mental health settings. Alternatively, earning an online master's in counseling develops advanced skills in therapy, assessment, and client support—and often provides flexible options for working professionals.

Individuals focused on supporting families and couples may pursue mft masters programs, which offer specialized training in marriage and family therapy. If you are passionate about research, teaching, or mental health advocacy, an online psychology masters can pave the way to a broad spectrum of psychology careers.

These related online degrees not only complement Neuroscience studies but also serve as practical pathways to impactful careers in healthcare, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Cynthia G. Wible

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles