World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
72
Citations
20264
World Ranking
19810
National Ranking
9866

Gerard P. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerard P. Smith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 264 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gerard P. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerard P. Smith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerard P. Smith is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Materials Science. Within these broader fields, their work focuses on subfields such as Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's academic contributions emphasize key topics like:

  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Gene expression and cancer classification

Gerard P. Smith has published research in the journal Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics. One of the recent papers authored by them is titled High-throughput assessment for drug protein binding using magnetized silica beads method in human liver microsomes, published in 2024.

Collaborations have involved a range of frequent co-authors including:

  • Hongguang Shao
  • Libin Li
  • Kunru Wang
  • Tae-Seok Oh
  • Matthew McCoy

This body of work suggests a research focus integrating biochemical analysis techniques with molecular and materials chemistry methodologies. The scientist's contributions relate to understanding enzyme mechanisms and protein dynamics, with applications potentially relevant to cancer classification and gene expression.

Best Publications

  • Cholecystokinin decreases food intake in rats.

    James Gibbs;Robert C. Young;Gerard P. Smith

  • Abdominal vagotomy blocks the satiety effect of cholecystokinin in the rat

    GP Smith;C Jerome;BJ Cushin;R Eterno

  • Cholecystokinin elicits the complete behavioral sequence of satiety in rats.

    Joseph Antin;James Gibbs;Jonathan Holt;Robert C. Young

  • Cholecystokinin elicits Satiety in Rats with Open Gastric Fistulas

    James Gibbs;Robert C. Young;Gerard P. Smith

  • Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat

    Andras Hajnal;Gerard P. Smith;Ralph Norgren

  • Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions

    John D. Davis;Gerard P. Smith

  • Afferent axons in abdominal vagus mediate satiety effect of cholecystokinin in rats

    G. P. Smith;C. Jerome;R. Norgren

  • Central distribution of subdiaphragmatic vagal branches in the rat.

    Ralph Norgren;Gerard P. Smith

  • Volume of food consumed affects satiety in men

    Barbara J. Rolls;Victoria H. Castellanos;Jason C. Halford;Arun Kilara

  • The direct and indirect controls of meal size.

    Gerard P. Smith

  • Mesolimbicocortical dopamine terminal fields are necessary for normal locomotor and investigatory exploration in rats

    J. Stephen Fink;Gerard P. Smith

  • Absence of satiety during sham feeding in the rat.

    Robert C. Young;James Gibbs;Joseph Antin;Jonathan Holt

  • Transport of cholecystokinin (CCK) binding sites in subdiaphragmatic vagal branches.

    Timothy H. Moran;Gerard P. Smith;Anne M. Hostetler;Paul R. McHugh

  • The controls of eating: A shift from nutritional homeostasis to behavioral neuroscience

    Gerard P Smith

  • Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat.

    Nori Geary;Nori Geary;Gerard P. Smith;Gerard P. Smith

  • Characterization of type A and type B CCK receptor binding sites in rat vagus nerve.

    Eric S. Corp;Jennifer McQuade;Timothy H. Moran;Gerard P. Smith

  • Satiating effect of cholecystokinin.

    G. P. Smith;J. Gibbs

  • Effects of peripheral and central bombesin on feeding behavior of rats.

    J. Gibbs;J. Gibbs;P.J. Kulkosky;P.J. Kulkosky;G.P. Smith;G.P. Smith

  • Intestinal satiety in rats.

    David S. Liebling;John D. Eisner;James Gibbs;Gerard P. Smith

  • The satiety effect of cholecystokinin: a progress report.

    G.P. Smith;J. Gibbs;C. Jerome;F.X. Pi-Sunyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Nori Geary
Nori Geary Cornell University
Aron Weller
Aron Weller Bar-Ilan University
Robert C. Young
Robert C. Young Cornell University
Audrey R. Tyrka
Audrey R. Tyrka Brown University
Tong H. Joh
Tong H. Joh Cornell University
Joseph H. Antin
Joseph H. Antin Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Robert C. Ritter
Robert C. Ritter Washington State University
Timothy H. Moran
Timothy H. Moran Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ralph Norgren
Ralph Norgren Pennsylvania State University
Streamson C. Chua
Streamson C. Chua Albert Einstein College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine extends far beyond the traditional MD route. There are numerous online degree options and alternative pathways that can launch or advance a healthcare career in the USA. For those interested in nursing leadership or academia, online nursing phd programs provide flexibility and can be more affordable than in-person options.

If you’re starting with an associate’s degree in nursing, advancing your credentials is easier with online programs. Understanding the average cost of rn to bsn programs is important for budgeting and making informed decisions about your education investment.

For applicants holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree who are aiming for advanced nursing roles, direct entry msn programs offer a fast-track into nursing practice at the master’s level.

Prospective nursing students can also benefit from understanding which schools may make the admissions process less competitive. Researching direct entry nursing programs can increase your chances of acceptance and streamline your entry into the field.

Best Scientists Citing Gerard P. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles