World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11778 11080 1117 1068 548 29624

Jim Todd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jim Todd between 1972 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jim Todd published across 55 years, from 1972 to 2026, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2020. 18 of the 612 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2020. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 8 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1972 2026

612 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jim Todd: publications per year, 1972 to 2026
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 2
1975 3
1976 4
1977 8
1978 5
1979 6
1980 4
1981 7
1982 5
1983 2
1984 10
1985 7
1986 4
1987 7
1988 6
1989 4
1990 4
1991 5
1992 3
1993 18
1994 9
1995 11
1996 7
1997 9
1998 7
1999 6
2000 7
2001 7
2002 13
2003 6
2004 10
2005 9
2006 19
2007 14
2008 20
2009 12
2010 7
2011 14
2012 15
2013 22
2014 31
2015 27
2016 14
2017 25
2018 22
2019 27
2020 37
2021 20
2022 11
2023 15
2024 25
2025 17
2026 1
Total 612
Download as CSV

Jim Todd publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 548 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 548
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jim Todd D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jim Todd is a researcher affiliated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their work spans several main topics, including:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment

Jim Todd has contributed to numerous scientific papers with noteworthy recent publications such as:

  • Age patterns of HIV incidence in eastern and southern Africa: a modelling analysis of observational population-based cohort studies, 2021, The Lancet HIV
  • Personal protection with PBO-pyrethroid synergist-treated nets after 2 years of household use against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles in Tanzania, 2021, Parasites & Vectors
  • Prevalence and incidence rate of tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients enrolled in HIV care, treatment, and support program in mainland Tanzania, 2020, Tropical Medicine and Health
  • Effect of tuberculosis infection on mortality of HIV-infected patients in Northern Tanzania, 2020, Tropical Medicine and Health
  • Effectiveness of Lifelong ART (Option B+) in the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV Programme in Zambia: Observations Based on Routinely Collected Health Data, 2020, Frontiers in Public Health

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jim Todd include:

  • Michael Johnson Mahande
  • Milly Marston
  • Sia E. Msuya
  • Jay Greenfield
  • Mark Urassa

Their work has been published consistently in a range of scientific journals, among the most frequent venues are:

  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • AAS Open Research
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • Impact of improved treatment of sexually transmitted diseases on HIV infection in rural Tanzania: randomised controlled trial

    H. Grosskurth;J. Todd;E. Mwijarubi;P. Mayaud

  • Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I Staphylococci.

    James Todd;Mark Fishaut;Frank Kapral;Thomas Welch

  • Defining the Group A Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome: Rationale and Consensus Definition

    Robert F. Breiman;Jeffrey P. Davis;Richard R. Facklam;Barry M. Gray

  • Improved outcome of clindamycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infection.

    Julie Zimbelman;April Palmer;James Todd

  • Absolute levels and ratios of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine production in vitro predict clinical immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

    D. Dodoo;F. M. Omer;J. Todd;B. D. Akanmori

  • Syphilis in Pregnancy in Tanzania. I. Impact of Maternal Syphilis on Outcome of Pregnancy

    Deborah Watson-Jones;Deborah Watson-Jones;John Changalucha;Balthazar Gumodoka;Helen Weiss

  • Single-Dose Azithromycin versus Penicillin G Benzathine for the Treatment of Early Syphilis

    Gabriele Riedner;Mary Rusizoka;Jim Todd;Leonard Maboko

  • Biological and behavioural impact of an adolescent sexual health intervention in Tanzania: a community-randomized trial.

    David A. Ross;John Changalucha;Angela I. N. Obasi;Jim Todd

  • Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Autistic Spectrum Disorder: A Critical Review of Published Original Data

    Sarah K Parker;Benjamin Schwartz;James Todd;Larry K Pickering

  • “A bit more truthful”: the validity of adolescent sexual behaviour data collected in rural northern Tanzania using five methods

    M L Plummer;D A Ross;D Wight;J Changalucha

  • Overlap in the clinical features of pneumonia and malaria in African children

    T. J. D. O'Dempsey;T. F. McArdle;B. E. Laurence;A. C. Lamont

  • Cost-effectiveness of improved treatment services for sexually transmitted diseases in preventing HIV-1 infection in Mwanza region Tanzania.

    Lucy Gilson;Rashid Mkanje;Heiner Grosskurth;Heiner Grosskurth;Frank Mosha

  • Association of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates with clinical components of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome.

    D F Talkington;B Schwartz;C M Black;J K Todd

  • Antenatal microbiologic and maternal risk factors associated with prematurity

    J.A. McGregor;J.I. French;R. Richter;A. Franco-Buff

  • Implementation of Rapid Molecular Infectious Disease Diagnostics: the Role of Diagnostic and Antimicrobial Stewardship.

    Kevin Messacar;Sarah K Parker;James K Todd;Samuel R Dominguez

  • Incidence of HIV infection in stable sexual partnerships: a retrospective cohort study of 1802 couples in Mwanza Region, Tanzania.

    Stephane Hugonnet;Frank Mosha;James Todd;Kokugonza. Mugeye

  • Cause-specific mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa and Bangladesh.

    Martin Adjuik;Tom Smith;Sam Clark;Jim Todd

  • A community trial of the impact of improved sexually transmitted disease treatment on the HIV epidemic in rural Tanzania: 2. Baseline survey results.

    Grosskurth H;Mosha F;Todd J;Senkoro K

  • Neonatal Outcomes After Elective Cesarean Delivery

    B.D. Kamath;J.K. Todd;J.E. Glazner;D. Lezotte

  • A community trial of the impact of improved sexually transmitted disease treatment on the HIV epidemic in rural Tanzania: 1. Design.

    Richard Hayes;Frank Mosha;Angus Nicoll;Heiner Grosskurth

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Urassa
Mark Urassa Medical Research Council
Heiner Grosskurth
Heiner Grosskurth University of London
Richard J. Hayes
Richard J. Hayes London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
David Mabey
David Mabey London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Mike English
Mike English Wellcome Trust
Brian Greenwood
Brian Greenwood London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Helen A. Weiss
Helen A. Weiss London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Matthew Price
Matthew Price University of Vermont
Sylvia Kaaya
Sylvia Kaaya Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
Abdisalan M. Noor
Abdisalan M. Noor World Health Organization

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in careers related to Medicine but aren’t ready to commit to medical school, there are several promising online pathways to explore. For those drawn to the business and administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa can provide a fast, flexible route into the healthcare industry.

Aspiring nurses may also find options tailored to their needs. Consider nursing programs without teas if you want to avoid standardized entrance exams and start your training sooner.

Those interested in leadership roles could pursue an online healthcare management degree to gain expertise in hospital or clinic administration. And for registered nurses looking to advance, exploring adn to msn bridge programs offers a strategic way to move up the clinical ladder and broaden your career prospects.

These flexible online degrees and bridge programs offer accessible entry points into vital healthcare roles, serving as strong alternatives or complements to traditional pathways in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Todd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles