World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
47345
World Ranking
8778
National Ranking
856

Immunology

D-Index
98
Citations
47335
World Ranking
777
National Ranking
69

Sarah Rowland-Jones publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Rowland-Jones sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 541 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Sarah Rowland-Jones D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Rowland-Jones sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Sarah Rowland-Jones is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses broadly on medicine, with additional emphases on immunology and microbiology. Within these fields, specific subfields include infectious diseases, immunology, epidemiology, virology, and neurology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Communications
  • AIDS
  • Nature reviews. Immunology

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • Clinical characteristics with inflammation profiling of long COVID and association with 1-year recovery following hospitalisation in the UK: a prospective observational study (2022, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine)
  • Immunogenicity of standard and extended dosing intervals of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (2021, Cell)
  • T-cell and antibody responses to first BNT162b2 vaccine dose in previously infected and SARS-CoV-2-naive UK health-care workers: a multicentre prospective cohort study (2021, The Lancet Microbe)
  • T cell assays differentiate clinical and subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infections from cross-reactive antiviral responses (2021, Nature Communications)
  • The D614G mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Implications for viral infectivity, disease severity and vaccine design (2020, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications)

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers including:

  • Thushan I. de Silva
  • Dan Wootton
  • Lance Turtle
  • Shona C. Moore
  • Susanna Dunachie

Sarah Rowland-Jones has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom, reflecting their engagement with the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Tracking Changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Evidence that D614G Increases Infectivity of the COVID-19 Virus.

    Bette Korber;Will M. Fischer;Sandrasegaram Gnanakaran;Hyejin Yoon

  • Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections.

    Victor Appay;P. Rod Dunbar;Margaret Callan;Paul Klenerman

  • Quantitation of HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and plasma load of viral RNA.

    G. S. Ogg;Xia Jin;S. Bonhoeffer;P. R. Dunbar

  • Late escape from an immunodominant cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response associated with progression to AIDS.

    P. J. R. Goulder;R. E. Phillips;R. A. Colbert;S. Mcadam

  • Human immunodeficiency virus genetic variation that can escape cytotoxic T cell recognition.

    R E Phillips;S Rowland-Jones;D F Nixon;F M Gotch

  • Skewed maturation of memory HIV-specific CD8 T lymphocytes

    P Champagne;G S Ogg;A S King;C Knabenhans

  • HIV-Specific Cd8+T Cells Produce Antiviral Cytokines but Are Impaired in Cytolytic Function

    Victor Appay;Douglas F. Nixon;Sean M. Donahoe;Geraldine M.A. Gillespie

  • Original antigenic sin and apoptosis in the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever.

    Juthathip Mongkolsapaya;Wanwisa Dejnirattisai;Xiao-ning Xu;Sirijitt Vasanawathana

  • HIV-specific cytotoxic T-cells in HIV-exposed but uninfected Gambian women

    Sarah Rowland-Jones;Julian Sutton;Koya Ariyoshi;Tao Dong

  • Cellular immune responses to HIV.

    Andrew J. McMichael;Sarah L. Rowland-Jones

  • RANTES: a versatile and controversial chemokine

    Victor Appay;Sarah L Rowland-Jones

  • Human inhibitory receptors Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2) and ILT4 compete with CD8 for MHC class I binding and bind preferentially to HLA-G

    Mitsunori Shiroishi;Kouhei Tsumoto;Kimie Amano;Yasuo Shirakihara

  • Characterization of CD4(+) CTLs ex vivo.

    Victor Appay;John J. Zaunders;Laura Papagno;Julian Sutton

  • A Re-Evaluation of the Frequency of CD8+ T Cells Specific for EBV in Healthy Virus Carriers

    Linda C. Tan;Nancy Gudgeon;Nicola E. Annels;Pokrath Hansasuta

  • Clustered Mutations in HIV-1 Gag Are Consistently Required for Escape from Hla-B27–Restricted Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses

    Anthony D. Kelleher;Chad Long;Edward C Holmes;Rachel L. Allen

  • Immune Activation and CD8+ T-Cell Differentiation towards Senescence in HIV-1 Infection

    L Papagno;C A Spina;A Marchant;M Salio

  • Cytotoxic T cell responses to multiple conserved HIV epitopes in HIV-resistant prostitutes in Nairobi.

    S. L. Rowland-Jones;Tao Dong;K. R. Fowke;J. Kimani

  • Functional Heterogeneity and High Frequencies of Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD8+ T Lymphocytes in Healthy Seropositive Donors

    Geraldine M. A. Gillespie;Mark R. Wills;Victor Appay;Chris O'Callaghan

  • Cytotoxic T-cell activity antagonized by naturally occurring HIV-1 Gag variants

    P Klenerman;S Rowland-Jones;S McAdam;J Edwards

  • HIV-1-specific mucosal CD8+ lymphocyte responses in the cervix of HIV-1-resistant prostitutes in Nairobi.

    Rupert Kaul;Francis A. Plummer;Francis A. Plummer;Joshua Kimani;Tao Dong

Frequent Co-Authors

Tao Dong
Tao Dong University of Oxford
Andrew J. McMichael
Andrew J. McMichael University of Oxford
Hilton Whittle
Hilton Whittle London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Francis A. Plummer
Francis A. Plummer University of Manitoba
Rupert Kaul
Rupert Kaul University of Toronto
Graham S. Ogg
Graham S. Ogg University of Oxford
Job J. Bwayo
Job J. Bwayo University of Nairobi
Grace John-Stewart
Grace John-Stewart University of Washington
Dorothy Mbori-Ngacha
Dorothy Mbori-Ngacha United Nations Children's Fund
Matthew Cotten
Matthew Cotten Wellcome Sanger Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Immunology in the USA opens doors to various healthcare and research careers. For those interested in clinical roles, nursing is a common pathway. Students seeking a quicker entry into nursing might explore programs highlighted in easiest accelerated nursing programs to get into, which offer streamlined routes to becoming a registered nurse.

For individuals aiming for foundational nursing positions, the best easiest lpn programs to get into provide accessible and flexible options. These programs typically require less time than traditional nursing tracks and can lead to rewarding careers in patient care.

Advanced practice nurses specializing in immunology-related care may find value in exploring what is the easiest np program. These nurse practitioner programs often include online formats that accommodate working professionals and provide essential training for specialized roles.

For those interested in mental health aspects of immunology, pursuing a degree through best pmhnp programs online ensures access to clinical placements and quality education, enabling careers as psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah Rowland-Jones

Trending Scientists