World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
18536
World Ranking
16343
National Ranking
8222

Edward M. Stricker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Stricker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 267 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edward M. Stricker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Stricker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward M. Stricker is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research and scholarly activities within this institution.

Details about research papers authored by Edward M. Stricker are not provided. Likewise, information on frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields or subfields of study, and specific topics of research have not been specified.

There are no recorded awards linked to Edward M. Stricker in the available data.

As an active researcher associated with a major university, Edward M. Stricker is positioned within the American academic landscape. Their contributions, while not detailed in this data set, are part of the broader scholarly environment at the University of Pittsburgh.

Best Publications

  • Compensations after lesions of central dopaminergic neurons: some clinical and basic implications.

    Michael J. Zigmond;Elizabeth D. Abercrombie;Theodore W. Berger;Anthony A. Grace

  • Oxytocin secretion in response to cholecystokinin and food: differentiation of nausea from satiety

    Joseph G. Verbalis;Joseph G. Verbalis;Monica J. McCann;Colleen M. McHale;Edward M. Stricker

  • The physiological psychology of hunger: a physiological perspective.

    Mark I. Friedman;Edward M. Stricker

  • Deficits in Feeding Behavior after Intraventricular Injection of 6-Hydroxydopamine in Rats

    Michael J. Zigmond;Edward M. Stricker

  • Oxytocin produces natriuresis in rats at physiological plasma concentrations.

    Joseph G. Verbalis;Michael P. Mangione;Edward M. Stricker

  • Oxytocin and an oxytocin agonist administered centrally decrease food intake in rats.

    Beatriz R. Olson;Marcia D. Drutarosky;Min Shine Chow;Victor J. Hruby

  • Interaction of osmotic and volume stimuli in regulation of neurohypophyseal secretion in rats.

    E. M. Stricker;J. G. Verbalis

  • Recovery of Feeding and Drinking by Rats after Intraventricular 6-Hydroxydopamine or Lateral Hypothalamic Lesions

    Michael J. Zigmond;Edward M. Stricker

  • Apparent sprouting of striatal serotonergic terminals after dopamine-depleting brain lesions in neonatal rats

    Michal K. Stachowiak;John P. Bruno;Abigail M. Snyder;Edward M. Stricker

  • Hyperphagia and increased growth in rats after intraventricular injection of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine.

    Charles F. Saller;Edward M. Stricker

  • Extracellular fluid volume and thirst.

    EM Stricker

  • Effects of dopaminergic agonists and antagonists of feeding in intact and 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats.

    T G Heffner;M J Zigmond;E M Stricker

  • Cholecystokinin and gastric distension activate oxytocinergic cells in rat hypothalamus

    L. P. Renaud;M. Tang;M. J. McCann;E. M. Stricker

  • Osmoregulation and volume regulation in rats: inhibition of hypovolemic thirst by water.

    EM Stricker

  • Animal models of parkinsonism using selective neurotoxins: clinical and basic implications.

    Michael J. Zigmond;Edward M. Stricker

  • Cholecystokinin activates C-fos expression in hypothalamic oxytocin and corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons.

    Joseph G. Verbalis;Edward M. Stricker;Alan G. Robinson;Gloria E. Hoffman

  • Effects on homeostasis of intraventricular injections of 6-hydroxydopamine in rats.

    Edward M. Stricker;Michael J. Zigmond

  • c-Fos Expression in Rat Brain and Brainstem Nuclei in Response to Treatments That Alter Food Intake and Gastric Motility.

    Beatriz R. Olson;Maria Freilino;Gloria E. Hoffman;Edward M. Stricker

  • Activation-induced restoration of sensorimotor functions in rats with dopamine-depleting brain lesions.

    John F. Marshall;Deborah Levitan;Edward M. Stricker

  • Brain oxytocin receptor antagonism blunts the effects of anorexigenic treatments in rats: evidence for central oxytocin inhibition of food intake.

    Beatriz R. Olson;Marcia D. Drutarosky;Edward M. Stricker;Joseph G. Verbalis

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph G. Verbalis
Joseph G. Verbalis Georgetown University Medical Center
Michael J. Zigmond
Michael J. Zigmond University of Pittsburgh
Alan F. Sved
Alan F. Sved University of Pittsburgh
Gloria E. Hoffman
Gloria E. Hoffman Morgan State University
Michal K. Stachowiak
Michal K. Stachowiak University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Theodore W. Berger
Theodore W. Berger University of Southern California
Linda Rinaman
Linda Rinaman Florida State University
Elizabeth D. Abercrombie
Elizabeth D. Abercrombie Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John P. Bruno
John P. Bruno The Ohio State University
Ralph Norgren
Ralph Norgren Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career advancement in medicine opens up diverse educational options online. Many registered nurses are opting to pursue rn to np programs online, allowing RNs to become nurse practitioners with greater specialization and earning potential, all while continuing to work.

Healthcare professionals interested in diet and wellness can benefit from online nutrition degree programs. These flexible degrees equip students with foundational knowledge in nutritional science and open doors to roles in health education, wellness coaching, and public health.

For those targeting leadership, top cahme accredited mha programs prepare future healthcare managers and executives. These online degrees focus on the business and administrative aspects of the medical field and carry critical accreditation for credibility.

Additionally, RNs seeking to expand their qualifications without on-site requirements can look into online rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs are designed for convenience and can help nurses access advanced roles or further graduate studies.

Best Scientists Citing Edward M. Stricker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles