World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
8202
World Ranking
5168
National Ranking
2310

Michal K. Stachowiak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal K. Stachowiak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 135 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michal K. Stachowiak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal K. Stachowiak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michal K. Stachowiak is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting fields, including Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Specific subfields of study are Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Their work covers a range of topics within these disciplines. Key research themes include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, Neonatal Respiratory Health Research, and Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Development and Cancer.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Ewa K. Stachowiak, Michał Liput, Anirban Dutta, Justyna Augustyniak, and Yongho Bae.

Michal K. Stachowiak has contributed to multiple publication venues. Their notable venues include the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Scientific Reports, Brain Sciences, and Clinical Cancer Research.

Recent papers demonstrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Immune Factor, TNFα, Disrupts Human Brain Organoid Development Similar to Schizophrenia-Schizophrenia Increases Developmental Vulnerability to TNFα, 2020, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
  • Global Genome Conformational Programming during Neuronal Development Is Associated with CTCF and Nuclear FGFR1-The Genome Archipelago Model, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • A proof of concept 'phase zero' study of neurodevelopment using brain organoid models with Vis/near-infrared spectroscopy and electrophysiology, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Bioenergy Crisis in Coronavirus Diseases?, 2020, Brain Sciences
  • Dual-Hit Strategy for Therapeutic Targeting of Pancreatic Cancer in Patient-Derived Xenograft Tumors, 2024, Clinical Cancer Research

Best Publications

  • Organically modified silica nanoparticles: a nonviral vector for in vivo gene delivery and expression in the brain.

    Dhruba J. Bharali;Ilona Klejbor;Ewa K. Stachowiak;Purnendu Dutta

  • Neurochemical Compensation After Nigrostriatal Bundle Injury in an Animal Model of Preclinical Parkinsonism

    Michael J. Zigmond;Ann L. Acheson;Michal K. Stachowiak;Edward M. Strickerm

  • Apparent sprouting of striatal serotonergic terminals after dopamine-depleting brain lesions in neonatal rats

    Michal K. Stachowiak;John P. Bruno;Abigail M. Snyder;Edward M. Stricker

  • TC-5619: An alpha7 neuronal nicotinic receptor-selective agonist that demonstrates efficacy in animal models of the positive and negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction of schizophrenia

    T.A. Hauser;A. Kucinski;K.G. Jordan;G.J. Gatto

  • Vitamin D increases expression of the tyrosine hydroxylase gene in adrenal medullary cells.

    Elzbieta Puchacz;Walter E. Stumpf;Ewa K. Stachowiak;Michal K. Stachowiak

  • Cerebral organoids reveal early cortical maldevelopment in schizophrenia-computational anatomy and genomics, role of FGFR1.

    E. K. Stachowiak;C. A. Benson;S. T. Narla;A. Dimitri;A. Dimitri

  • Nuclear accumulation of FGF-2 is associated with proliferation of human astrocytes and glioma cells.

    A Joy;J Moffett;K Neary;E Mordechai

  • Increased dopamine efflux from striatal slices during development and after nigrostriatal bundle damage

    MK Stachowiak;RW Keller;EM Stricker;MJ Zigmond

  • Integrative nuclear FGFR1 signaling (INFS) as a part of a universal “feed‐forward‐and‐gate” signaling module that controls cell growth and differentiation

    Michal K. Stachowiak;Xiaohong Fang;Jason M. Myers;Star M. Dunham

  • Nuclear accumulation of fibroblast growth factor receptors in human glial cells - association with cell proliferation

    E K Stachowiak;P A Maher;J Tucholski;E Mordechai

  • Increased dopamine release from striata of rats after unilateral nigrostriatal bundle damage

    W.Q. Zhang;H.A. Tilson;K.P. Nanry;P.M. Hudson

  • Nuclear accumulation of fibroblast growth factor receptors is regulated by multiple signals in adrenal medullary cells.

    M K Stachowiak;P A Maher;A Joy;E Mordechai

  • REGULATION OF BFGF GENE EXPRESSION AND SUBCELLULAR DISTRIBUTION OF BFGF PROTEIN IN ADRENAL MEDULLARY CELLS

    M K Stachowiak;J Moffett;A Joy;E Puchacz

  • Coordinate and differential regulation of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase, tyrosine hydroxylase and proenkephalin mRNAs by neural and hormonal mechanisms in cultured bovine adrenal medullary cells

    M.K. Stachowiak;J.S. Hong;O.H. Viveros

  • GROWTH FACTOR REGULATION OF CELL GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM : A NEW INTRACRINE NUCLEAR MECHANISM

    M K Stachowiak;J Moffett;P Maher;J Tucholski

  • Neural stem-like cell line derived from a nonhematopoietic population of human umbilical cord blood.

    Leonora Bużańska;Marcin Jurga;Ewa K. Stachowiak;Michal K. Stachowiak

  • cAMP-induced differentiation of human neuronal progenitor cells is mediated by nuclear fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (FGFR1)

    E. K. Stachowiak;X. Fang;J. Myers;S. Dunham

  • Voltage-Sensitive and Ligand-Gated Channels in Differentiating Neural Stem–Like Cells Derived from the Nonhematopoietic Fraction of Human Umbilical Cord Blood

    Wei Sun;Leonora Buzanska;Krystyna Domanska‐Janik;Richard J. Salvi

  • Integrative nuclear signaling in cell development--a role for FGF receptor-1.

    Michal K. Stachowiak;Pamela A. Maher;Ewa K. Stachowiak

  • Nuclear localization of functional FGF receptor 1 in human astrocytes suggests a novel mechanism for growth factor action.

    M.K. Stachowiak;P.A. Maher;A. Joy;E. Mordechai

  • Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling affects development and function of dopamine neurons – inhibition results in a schizophrenia‐like syndrome in transgenic mice

    Ilona Klejbor;Jason M. Myers;Kathy Hausknecht;Thomas D. Corso;Thomas D. Corso

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Zigmond
Michael J. Zigmond University of Pittsburgh
Jau-Shyong Hong
Jau-Shyong Hong National Institutes of Health
Edward M. Stricker
Edward M. Stricker University of Pittsburgh
Paras N. Prasad
Paras N. Prasad University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Pamela Maher
Pamela Maher Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Indrajit Roy
Indrajit Roy University of Delhi
Josep Miquel Jornet
Josep Miquel Jornet Northeastern University
Mulchand S. Patel
Mulchand S. Patel University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Richard Salvi
Richard Salvi University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Ronald Berezney
Ronald Berezney University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Neuroscience often explore related online degree programs for greater flexibility and accessible career advancement. Many choose to study psychology online as a foundational step, with affordable programs that offer exposure to essential theories and methods relevant to neuroscience.

For those seeking roles in social work and counseling, some of the easiest msw programs to get into provide accessible paths for entry into the mental health field. These programs often have lower admissions barriers and quicker application turnarounds, helping students get started sooner.

If your interests lean toward clinical psychology, you might consider the cheapest psyd programs available online. These doctoral programs are designed for those aiming to provide high-level psychological services, often leading to licensure as clinical psychologists.

Additionally, accelerated options are available—review some of the accelerated online mft programs for a faster route to becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist. These flexible, shorter programs can help you join the workforce and begin making an impact in mental health more quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Michal K. Stachowiak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles