World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
8032
World Ranking
6699
National Ranking
2905

Richard M. Kostrzewa publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Kostrzewa sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 251 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard M. Kostrzewa D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Kostrzewa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. Kostrzewa is affiliated with East Tennessee State University in the United States. Their research contributions span the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biochemistry, and Clinical Biochemistry.

The primary topics explored in their work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Neurological disorders and treatments, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism, and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • Neonatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning of rats and dopaminergic neurotoxicity: proposed animal model of Parkinson's disease (2022, Journal of Neural Transmission)
  • p-Chloroamphetamine-Enhanced Neostriatal Dopamine Exocytosis in Rats Neonatally Co-lesioned with 6-OHDA and 5,7-DHT: Relevance to Parkinson's Disease (2020, Neurotoxicity Research)

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Journal of Neural Transmission
  • Neurotoxicity Research

Common collaborators in their work include:

  • John P. Kostrzewa
  • Wael Mohamed
  • Nicola Luigi Brogazzi

Richard M. Kostrzewa has also contributed to book publications, notably the work titled Brain-Iron Cross Talk published in 2022 within the field of Nutritional neurosciences.

Best Publications

  • Pharmacological Actions of 6-Hydroxydopamine

    Richard M. Kostrzewa;David M. Jacobowitz

  • Dopamine receptor supersensitivity

    Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Necrostatin‐1 protects against glutamate‐induced glutathione depletion and caspase‐independent cell death in HT‐22 cells

    Xingshun Xu;Chu C. Chua;Jiming Kong;Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Selective action of 6-hydroxydopa on noradrenergic terminals: Mapping of preterminal axons of the brain

    David Jacobowitz;Richard Kostrzewa

  • Physical Exercise Alleviates ADHD Symptoms: Regional Deficits and Development Trajectory

    Trevor Archer;Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Supersensitization of the oral response to SKF 38393 in neonatal 6-OHDA-lesioned rats is mediated through a serotonin system.

    Li Gong;R. M. Kostrzewa;R. W. Fuller;K. W. Perry

  • Supersensitized D1 receptors mediate enhanced oral activity after neonatal 6-OHDA.

    Richard M. Kostrzewa;Li Gong

  • Neurotoxins and neurotoxic species implicated in neurodegeneration.

    Juan Segura-Aguilar;Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Elevated gene expression of glutamate receptors in noradrenergic neurons from the locus coeruleus in major depression.

    Michelle J. Chandley;Attila Szebeni;Katalin Szebeni;Jessica D. Crawford

  • Serotonin Neural Adaptations to Ontogenetic Loss of Dopamine Neurons in Rat Brain

    Richard M. Kostrzewa;Tomás A. Reader;Laurent Descarries

  • Inhibition of connexin43 improves functional recovery after ischemic brain injury in neonatal rats

    Xiaojing Li;Heqing Zhao;Xianxing Tan;Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Proposed animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Richard M. Kostrzewa;Ryszard Brus;John H. Kalbfleisch;Ken W. Perry

  • A Comprehensive View of the Epigenetic Landscape Part I: DNA Methylation, Passive and Active DNA Demethylation Pathways and Histone Variants

    Anna Sadakierska-Chudy;Richard M. Kostrzewa;Małgorzata Filip;Małgorzata Filip

  • Influence of Physical Exercise on Neuroimmunological Functioning and Health: Aging and Stress

    Trevor Archer;Anders Fredriksson;Erica Schϋtz;Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Novel mechanisms and approaches in the study of neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. a review.

    Richard M. Kostrzewa;Juan Segura-Aguilar

  • Ontogenic homologous supersensitization of quinpirole-induced yawning in rats

    Richard M. Kostrzewa;Ryszard Brus;Ryszard Brus

  • Supersensitized oral responses to a serotonin agonist in neonatal 6-OHDA-treated rats.

    Li Gong;Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Supersensitization of the oral response to SKF 38393 in neonatal 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats is eliminated by neonatal 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine treatment.

    R Brus;R M Kostrzewa;K W Perry;R W Fuller

  • α-MSH and MIF-I effects on catecholamine levels and synthesis in various rat brain areas☆

    Richard M. Kostrzewa;Richard M. Kostrzewa;Abba J. Kastin;Abba J. Kastin;Morris A. Spirtes;Morris A. Spirtes

  • Alternating extremely low frequency magnetic field increases turnover of dopamine and serotonin in rat frontal cortex.

    Aleksander Sieroń;Łukasz Labus;Przemysław Nowak;Grzegorz Cieślar

  • Peculiarities of L -DOPA treatment of Parkinson’s disease

    R. M. Kostrzewa;P. Nowak;J. P. Kostrzewa;R. A. Kostrzewa

  • Handbook of Neurotoxicity

    Richard M. Kostrzewa

  • Dopamine receptor supersensitivity

    R M Kostrzewa;R Brus

Frequent Co-Authors

Trevor Archer
Trevor Archer University of Gothenburg
Tomás Palomo
Tomás Palomo Complutense University of Madrid
Richard J. Beninger
Richard J. Beninger Queen's University
Ray W. Fuller
Ray W. Fuller Eli Lilly (United States)
Abba J. Kastin
Abba J. Kastin Louisiana State University
Lary C. Walker
Lary C. Walker Emory University
David M. Jacobowitz
David M. Jacobowitz National Institutes of Health
Gilles J. Guillemin
Gilles J. Guillemin Bionyeri Pty Ltd
Michael T. Williams
Michael T. Williams University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Wojciech Danysz
Wojciech Danysz Merz Pharmaceuticals

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of academic and professional opportunities. With growing demand for specialists, students often consider both traditional and online options for advancing their studies and careers.

If you’re seeking a path with strong earning potential, reviewing the most lucrative college degrees can help you make informed decisions about your future. Many neuroscience-related fields, such as biotechnology or pharmaceuticals, are frequently listed among the top.

For those looking for flexibility and affordability, exploring fafsa-approved online certificate programs ensures that your education is both accredited and financially accessible. These options can make it easier to gain valuable credentials without disrupting your current commitments.

Interested in enhancing your skills quickly? Consider pursuing online courses with certificates. These programs can provide a competitive edge and often lead to high-paying roles within the field of neuroscience and related sectors.

If balancing studies with work or life commitments is a priority, you might explore the easiest degree to get online. This can help you progress toward a neuroscience career while maintaining flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Kostrzewa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles