World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 42 7650 7057 30 30 213 7050

Andrea Tamas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrea Tamas between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrea Tamas published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 7 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
2002 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrea Tamas: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 2
2004 6
2005 6
2006 17
2007 8
2008 14
2009 13
2010 11
2011 11
2012 15
2013 7
2014 19
2015 10
2016 18
2017 10
2018 11
2019 12
2020 8
2021 8
2022 3
2023 2
2024 5
2025 2
Total 221
Download as CSV

Andrea Tamas publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Tamas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 213 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262 213
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrea Tamas D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Tamas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrea Tamas is a researcher affiliated with the University of Pecs in Hungary. Their work spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on several subfields including Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Their research topics are centered on neuropeptides and animal physiology, as well as cardiovascular, neuropeptides, and oxidative stress research. Other key areas include receptor mechanisms and signaling, hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones, pain mechanisms and treatments, hormonal regulation and hypertension, and vitamin K research studies.

Tamas has published extensively, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Reproductive Biology
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • Pathogens

Among recent publications are:

  • Protective Effects of PACAP in Peripheral Organs, 2020, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • The Neuroprotective and Biomarker Potential of PACAP in Human Traumatic Brain Injury, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Protective Effects of PACAP in a Rat Model of Diabetic Neuropathy, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • PACAP-38 in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Humans and Pigs: A Translational Study, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide Alleviates Intestinal, Extra-Intestinal and Systemic Inflammatory Responses during Acute Campylobacter jejuni-induced Enterocolitis in Mice, 2020, Pathogens

Frequent collaborators in their research include Dóra Reglődi, Beáta Polgár, Tünde Tóth, Dénes Tóth, and Gabriella Horváth. These collaborations have contributed to the broader understanding of neuropeptide functions and related physiological mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Neurological reflexes and early motor behavior in rats subjected to neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury.

    Andrea Lubics;Dóra Reglodi;Andrea Tamás;Péter Kiss

  • Review on the protective effects of PACAP in models of neurodegenerative diseases in vitro and in vivo.

    D. Reglodi;P. Kiss;A. Lubics;A. Tamas

  • Novel tactics for neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease: Role of antibiotics, polyphenols and neuropeptides

    Dora Reglodi;Justine Renaud;Andrea Tamas;Yousef Tizabi

  • Examination of sensorimotor performance following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.

    D Reglődi;A Tamás;I Lengvári

  • Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide protects dopaminergic neurons and improves behavioral deficits in a rat model of Parkinson's disease

    Dóra Reglodi;Andrea Lubics;Andrea Tamás;Luca Szalontay

  • PACAP is an Endogenous Protective Factor—Insights from PACAP-Deficient Mice

    D. Reglodi;P. Kiss;K. Szabadfi;T. Atlasz

  • Effects of pretreatment with PACAP on the infarct size and functional outcome in rat permanent focal cerebral ischemia.

    D. Reglodi;A. Tamás;A. Somogyvári-Vigh;Z. Szántó

  • Protective effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide in endothelial cells against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis.

    Rácz B;Gasz B;Borsiczky B;Gallyas F

  • Effect of PACAP in Central and Peripheral Nerve Injuries

    Andrea Tamas;Dora Reglodi;Orsolya Farkas;Erzsebet Kovesdi

  • Effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide in retinal degeneration induced by monosodium-glutamate.

    Andrea Tamás;Róbert Gábriel;Boglárka Rácz;Viktória Dénes

  • Protective effects of the neuropeptide PACAP in diabetic retinopathy

    Krisztina Szabadfi;Tamas Atlasz;Peter Kiss;Dora Reglodi

  • The neuroprotective effects of PACAP in monosodium glutamate-induced retinal lesion involve inhibition of proapoptotic signaling pathways

    Boglárka Rácz;Ferenc Gallyas;Péter Kiss;Gábor Tóth

  • Protective Effects of PACAP in Peripheral Organs.

    Denes Toth;Edina Szabo;Andrea Tamas;Tamas Juhasz;Tamas Juhasz

  • PACAP promotes neuron survival in early experimental diabetic retinopathy

    Krisztina Szabadfi;Aliz Szabo;Peter Kiss;Dora Reglodi

  • PACAP Protects Against Salsolinol-Induced Toxicity in Dopaminergic SH-SY5Y Cells: Implication for Parkinson’s Disease

    Dwayne Brown;Andrea Tamas;Dora Reglödi;Yousef Tizabi

  • Evaluation of the protective effects of PACAP with cell-specific markers in ischemia-induced retinal degeneration.

    Tamas Atlasz;Krisztina Szabadfi;Peter Kiss;Andrea Tamas

  • PKA-Bad-14-3-3 and Akt-Bad-14-3-3 signaling pathways are involved in the protective effects of PACAP against ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis.

    Rácz B;Gasz B;Gallyas F;Kiss P

  • Morphological and functional effects of PACAP in 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesion of the substantia nigra in rats.

    Dóra Reglodi;Andrea Tamás;Andrea Lubics;Luca Szalontay

  • Distribution of PACAP-38 in the central nervous system of various species determined by a novel radioimmunoassay.

    Balázs Jakab;Dóra Reglodi;Rita Józsa;Tibor Hollósy

  • Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide ameliorates experimental acute ileitis and extra-intestinal sequelae

    Markus M. Heimesaat;Ildiko R. Dunay;Silvia Schulze;André Fischer

  • Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide is protective in bilateral carotid occlusion-induced retinal lesion in rats

    Tamás Atlasz;Norbert Babai;Péter Kiss;Dóra Reglodi

  • Effects of maternal separation on the neurobehavioral development of newborn Wistar rats.

    Jozsef Farkas;Dora Reglodi;Balazs Gaszner;Donat Szogyi

Frequent Co-Authors

Dora Reglodi
Dora Reglodi University of Pecs
Peter Kiss
Peter Kiss University of Pecs
Hitoshi Hashimoto
Hitoshi Hashimoto Osaka University
Zsuzsanna Helyes
Zsuzsanna Helyes University of Pecs
Akos Koller
Akos Koller New York Medical College
Markus M. Heimesaat
Markus M. Heimesaat Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Yousef Tizabi
Yousef Tizabi Howard University
Seiji Shioda
Seiji Shioda Shonan University of Medical Sciences
Zsolt Radak
Zsolt Radak Hungarian University of Sports Science
Eric P. Zorrilla
Eric P. Zorrilla Scripps Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, there are many related fields with rewarding careers and online degree options. Popular pathways include counseling, therapy, and psychology, all of which complement neuroscience study or offer a distinct but related career direction.

Students seeking flexibility may explore cacrep-accredited online counseling programs, designed for those who want to work in mental health counseling with recognized, high-quality standards. If affordability and accessibility are top priorities, you might consider enrolling in an online counseling degree program, enabling you to balance studies with other responsibilities.

For those interested in family dynamics and relationship therapy, online MFT programs are a popular choice, providing essential skills and clinical foundations needed for licensure and practice. Additionally, pursuing a master in psychology online can open doors to diverse roles in research, education, or clinical settings.

Each of these degrees provides unique opportunities and career paths for students passionate about the brain, behavior, or mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Tamas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles