World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
15967
World Ranking
12346
National Ranking
4997

Javier Romero publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Romero sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Javier Romero D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Romero sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Javier Romero is affiliated with Facebook in the United States and focuses research primarily in the field of Engineering. Their work spans several interconnected subfields, including Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, and Computational Mechanics.

Their research topics cover a variety of technical areas. Key topics include:

  • Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Human Motion and Animation
  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency

Javier Romero's recent publications reflect their multidisciplinary approach. Notable papers include:

  • Generation of H2 on Board Lng Vessels for Consumption in the Propulsion System (2020), published in Polish Maritime Research
  • Empowering CO2 Eco-Refrigeration With Colossal Breathing-Caloric-Like Effects in MOF-508b (2023), published in Advanced Materials
  • EXPLOITATION OF LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS COLD ENERGY IN FLOATING STORAGE REGASIFICATION UNITS (2021), published in Brodogradnja
  • Empowering CO2 Eco-Refrigeration With Colossal Breathing-Caloric-Like Effects in MOF-508b (Adv. Mater. 16/2024) (2024), published in Advanced Materials
  • The influence of Artificial Intelligence on the online consumer information search process (2022), published in EthAIca

The scientist has contributed to the academic community through collaborations with frequent co-authors such as Manuel Romero Gómez, Ignacio Arias-Fernández, María Gelpi, Javier García-Ben, and Sabina Rodríguez-Hermida.

Their publications appear regularly in specific venues, highlighting a focused engagement in specialized journals and conferences. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Advanced Materials
  • Polish Maritime Research
  • Brodogradnja
  • EthAIca

In addition to articles, Javier Romero has authored at least one book titled Teaching history to face the world today, published by Peter Lang in 2023.

Best Publications

  • SMPL: a skinned multi-person linear model

    Matthew Loper;Naureen Mahmood;Javier Romero;Gerard Pons-Moll

  • Keep It SMPL: Automatic Estimation of 3D Human Pose and Shape from a Single Image

    Federica Bogo;Angjoo Kanazawa;Christoph Lassner;Christoph Lassner;Peter V. Gehler;Peter V. Gehler

  • A Simple Yet Effective Baseline for 3d Human Pose Estimation

    Julieta Martinez;Rayat Hossain;Javier Romero;James J. Little

  • The GRASP Taxonomy of Human Grasp Types

    Thomas Feix;Javier Romero;Heinz-Bodo Schmiedmayer;Aaron M. Dollar

  • Learning a model of facial shape and expression from 4D scans

    Tianye Li;Timo Bolkart;Michael J. Black;Hao Li

  • Embodied hands: modeling and capturing hands and bodies together

    Javier Romero;Dimitrios Tzionas;Michael J. Black

  • Learning from Synthetic Humans

    Gul Varol;Javier Romero;Xavier Martin;Naureen Mahmood

  • On Human Motion Prediction Using Recurrent Neural Networks

    Julieta Martinez;Michael J. Black;Javier Romero

  • FAUST: Dataset and Evaluation for 3D Mesh Registration

    Federica Bogo;Javier Romero;Matthew Loper;Michael J. Black

  • Unite the People: Closing the Loop Between 3D and 2D Human Representations

    Christoph Lassner;Javier Romero;Martin Kiefel;Federica Bogo

  • Dynamic FAUST: Registering Human Bodies in Motion

    Federica Bogo;Javier Romero;Gerard Pons-Moll;Michael J. Black

  • Dyna: a model of dynamic human shape in motion

    Gerard Pons-Moll;Javier Romero;Naureen Mahmood;Michael J. Black

  • Visual object-action recognition: Inferring object affordances from human demonstration

    Hedvig Kjellström;Javier Romero;Danica Kragić

  • Detailed Full-Body Reconstructions of Moving People from Monocular RGB-D Sequences

    Federica Bogo;Michael J. Black;Matthew Loper;Javier Romero

  • Assessing body image in anorexia nervosa using biometric self-avatars in virtual reality: Attitudinal components rather than visual body size estimation are distorted

    Simone Claire Mölbert;Anne Thaler;Betty J. Mohler;Stephan Streuber

  • Hands in action: real-time 3D reconstruction of hands in interaction with objects

    Javier Romero;Hedvig Kjellstrom;Danica Kragic

  • Simultaneous Visual Recognition of Manipulation Actions and Manipulated Objects

    Hedvig Kjellström;Javier Romero;David Martínez;Danica Kragić

  • Monocular real-time 3D articulated hand pose estimation

    Javier Romero;Hedvig Kjellstrom;Danica Kragic

  • Efficient Learning on Point Clouds With Basis Point Sets

    Sergey Prokudin;Christoph Lassner;Javier Romero

  • A Metric for Comparing the Anthropomorphic Motion Capability of Artificial Hands

    T. Feix;J. Romero;C. H. Ek;H. B. Schmiedmayer

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Black
Michael J. Black Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Danica Kragic
Danica Kragic Royal Institute of Technology
Betty J. Mohler
Betty J. Mohler Amazon (United States)
Gerard Pons-Moll
Gerard Pons-Moll University of Tübingen
Jeanine K. Stefanucci
Jeanine K. Stefanucci University of Utah
Cordelia Schmid
Cordelia Schmid French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Andreas Bartels
Andreas Bartels Max Planck Society
Katrin Elisabeth Giel
Katrin Elisabeth Giel University of Tübingen
Philipp Hennig
Philipp Hennig University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to an array of online degree options and alternative career pathways. Many students consider branching out into related fields, such as physics, data science, or electrical engineering, each offering flexible and affordable online programs.

If you're looking to explore science programs that won’t break the bank, check out the cheapest online physics degree programs. For those interested in the fast-growing tech sector, earning a data scientist degree online could set you up for high-demand roles.

Aspiring engineers can gain valuable credentials through accredited online electrical engineering programs. Additionally, students looking for quick entry or career advancement should consider certificate programs that pay well, which can enhance your skillset and earning potential in a short time.

By exploring these options, you can tailor your educational journey to fit your goals and budget—setting yourself up for long-term career success.

Best Scientists Citing Javier Romero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles