World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeanine K. Stefanucci

Jeanine K. Stefanucci

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
5829
World Ranking
8612
National Ranking
4590

Jeanine K. Stefanucci publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanine K. Stefanucci sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 161 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Jeanine K. Stefanucci D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanine K. Stefanucci sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeanine K. Stefanucci is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields including Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Engineering, with substantial contributions across 34 publications in both Computer Science and Neuroscience, and 26 in Engineering.

Their work often focuses on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Automotive Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Social Psychology. This diversified expertise supports their investigations into topics like Spatial Cognition and Navigation, Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, and Augmented Reality Applications.

Jeanine K. Stefanucci's research particularly engages with perceptual and interactive technologies. Their notable contributions include explorations of virtual and augmented reality, evidenced in papers such as "Depth Perception in Augmented Reality: The Effects of Display, Shadow, and Position" published in 2022 at the 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), and "Shedding Light on Cast Shadows: An Investigation of Perceived Ground Contact in AR and VR" from 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

Other significant works include "Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologies," published in 2022 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, and "Evaluating Augmented Reality Landmark Cues and Frame of Reference Displays with Virtual Reality" in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2023. These publications focus on perceptual mechanisms within augmented and virtual environments and their implications for spatial understanding.

Jeanine K. Stefanucci has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, notably Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Bobby Bodenheimer, Holly Gagnon, Mirinda M. Whitaker, and Corey S. Shayman, with varying numbers of joint publications.

Their research outputs have also appeared repeatedly in specific venues such as the Journal of Vision, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Frontiers in Virtual Reality, and the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct).

In addition to articles, Jeanine K. Stefanucci has a book publication titled "Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality," published in 2022 by Springer Science+Business Media. The publication contributes to discourse on immersive technologies and their cognitive impacts.

  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
  • Multisensory perception and integration

  • Depth Perception in Augmented Reality: The Effects of Display, Shadow, and Position (2022, 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces)
  • Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologies (2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences)
  • Evaluating Augmented Reality Landmark Cues and Frame of Reference Displays with Virtual Reality (2023, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)
  • Estimating Distances in Action Space in Augmented Reality (2021, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception)
  • Shedding Light on Cast Shadows: An Investigation of Perceived Ground Contact in AR and VR (2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)

  • Sarah H. Creem-Regehr
  • Bobby Bodenheimer
  • Holly Gagnon
  • Mirinda M. Whitaker
  • Corey S. Shayman

  • Journal of Vision
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)

Best Publications

  • The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance

    Dennis R. Proffitt;Jeanine Stefanucci;Tom Banton;William Epstein

  • Social Support and the Perception of Geographical Slant

    Simone Schnall;Kent D. Harber;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines

    Lace M. Padilla;Lace M. Padilla;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Mary Hegarty;Jeanine K. Stefanucci

  • Skating down a steeper slope: fear influences the perception of geographical slant.

    Jeanine K Stefanucci;Dennis R Proffitt;Gerald L Clore;Nazish Parekh

  • The roles of altitude and fear in the perception of height

    Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Big people, little world: the body influences size perception.

    Jeanine K Stefanucci;Michael N Geuss

  • The perception of walking speed in a virtual environment

    Tom Banton;Jeanine Stefanucci;Frank Durgin;Adam Fass

  • A new mode of fear expression: perceptual bias in height fear.

    Bethany A. Teachman;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Elise M. Clerkin;Meghan W. Cody

  • Visual Perception from a Computer Graphics Perspective

    William Thompson;Roland Fleming;Sarah Creem-Regehr;Jeanine Kelly Stefanucci

  • An effect of mood on the perception of geographical slant

    Cedar R. Riener;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Dennis R. Proffitt;Gerald Clore

  • The Effects of Handedness and Reachability on Perceived Distance.

    Sally A. Linkenauger;Jessica K. Witt;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Jonathan Z. Bakdash

  • Don't look down: emotional arousal elevates height perception.

    Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Justin Storbeck

  • Distances appear different on hills.

    Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Dennis R. Proffitt;Tom Banton;William Epstein

  • Asymmetrical Body Perception: A Possible Role for Neural Body Representations

    Sally A. Linkenauger;Jessica K. Witt;Jonathan Z. Bakdash;Jeanine K. Stefanucci

  • The Infocockpit: providing location and place to aid human memory

    Desney S. Tan;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Dennis R. Proffitt;Randy Pausch

  • Relating spatial perspective taking to the perception of other’s affordances: Providing a foundation for predicting the future behavior of others.

    Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Kyle T. Gagnon;Michael N. Geuss;Jeanine K. Stefanucci

  • Egocentric distance perception in the Oculus Rift (DK2)

    Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;William B. Thompson;Nathan Nash

  • Follow your heart: Emotion adaptively influences perception.

    Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Kyle T. Gagnon;David A. Lessard

  • Imagery and fear influence height perception

    Elise M. Clerkin;Meghan W. Cody;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Gender differences in spatial navigation: Characterizing wayfinding behaviors.

    Ascher K Munion;Jeanine K Stefanucci;Ericka Rovira;Peter Squire

  • Can I pass?: using affordances to measure perceived size in virtual environments

    Michael Geuss;Jeanine Stefanucci;Sarah Creem-Regehr;William B. Thompson

  • BRIEF REPORT An effect of mood on the perception of geographical slant

    Cedar R. Riener;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Dennis R. Proffitt;Gerald Clore

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis R. Proffitt
Dennis R. Proffitt University of Virginia
Jessica K. Witt
Jessica K. Witt Colorado State University
Gerald L. Clore
Gerald L. Clore University of Virginia
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Bethany A. Teachman
Bethany A. Teachman University of Virginia
Jonathan Butner
Jonathan Butner University of Utah
Roberta L. Klatzky
Roberta L. Klatzky Carnegie Mellon University
Mary Hegarty
Mary Hegarty University of California, Santa Barbara
John J. Rieser
John J. Rieser Vanderbilt University
Lisa G. Aspinwall
Lisa G. Aspinwall University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a range of career opportunities, especially in the field of social work. Many students consider pursuing online degrees as a flexible path to their goals. However, requirements and pathways to becoming a social worker can vary significantly from state to state.

For example, if you’re interested in becoming a social worker in Ohio, you’ll need at least a Bachelor’s in Social Work and must pass a licensing exam. If you want to explore the requirements to be a social worker in Oklahoma, you’ll find that the state emphasizes supervised work experience and licensing at different practice levels.

In Oregon, the process is unique as outlined in this guide on how to become a social worker in Oregon. Similarly, if you wish to practice in Pennsylvania, it’s important to familiarize yourself with Pennsylvania social work license requirements, which detail the types of licenses and necessary education.

Online psychology and social work degrees provide a foundation for these careers, but always check your state’s specific licensure pathway before choosing your program.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanine K. Stefanucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles