World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
7821
World Ranking
11945
National Ranking
4880

Bobby Bodenheimer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bobby Bodenheimer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bobby Bodenheimer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bobby Bodenheimer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bobby Bodenheimer is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Automotive Engineering, and Social Psychology.

Their work focuses on key topics such as Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Augmented Reality Applications, Spatial Cognition and Navigation, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, Visual perception and processing mechanisms, Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies, and Action Observation and Synchronization.

Bodenheimer has published in several frequent venues, reflecting a focus on virtual and augmented reality as well as visualization technologies. These venues include:

  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
  • Journal of Vision

Recent papers indicate ongoing research contributions in perception and spatial cognition within virtual and augmented environments. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologies," 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Depth Perception in Augmented Reality: The Effects of Display, Shadow, and Position," 2022, 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • "Desktop versus immersive virtual environments: effects on spatial learning," 2020, Spatial Cognition and Computation
  • "Altered Peripersonal Space and the Bodily Self in Schizophrenia: A Virtual Reality Study," 2021, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • "The Impact of Embodiment and Avatar Sizing on Personal Space in Immersive Virtual Environments," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Bodenheimer include:

  • Sarah H. Creem-Regehr
  • Jeanine K. Stefanucci
  • Lauren Buck
  • Holly Gagnon
  • Timothy P. McNamara

Best Publications

  • Synthesis and evaluation of linear motion transitions

    Jing Wang;Bobby Bodenheimer

  • Verbs and adverbs: multidimensional motion interpolation

    C. Rose;M.F. Cohen;B. Bodenheimer

  • Efficient generation of motion transitions using spacetime constraints

    Charles Rose;Brian Guenter;Bobby Bodenheimer;Michael F. Cohen

  • Mixed /spl Hscr//sub 2/ and /spl Hscr//sub /spl infin// performance objectives. I. Robust performance analysis

    Kemin Zhou;K. Glover;B. Bodenheimer;J. Doyle

  • Exploring large virtual environments with an HMD when physical space is limited

    Betsy Williams;Gayathri Narasimham;Bjoern Rump;Timothy P. McNamara

  • The Process of Motion Capture: Dealing with the Data

    Bobby Bodenheimer;Chuck Rose;Seth Rosenthal;John Pella

  • Three-dimensional visualization of protein expression in mouse brain structures using imaging mass spectrometry

    Anna C. Crecelius;D. Shannon Cornett;Richard M. Caprioli;Betsy Williams

  • Do we need to walk for effective virtual reality navigation? physical rotations alone may suffice

    Bernhard E. Riecke;Bobby Bodenheimer;Timothy P. McNamara;Betsy Williams

  • Updating orientation in large virtual environments using scaled translational gain

    Betsy Williams;Gayathri Narasimham;Tim P. McNamara;Thomas H. Carr

  • Evaluation of walking in place on a Wii balance board to explore a virtual environment

    Betsy Williams;Stephen Bailey;Gayathri Narasimham;Muqun Li

  • An evaluation of a cost metric for selecting transitions between motion segments

    Jing Wang;Bobby Bodenheimer

  • The shape of human navigation: how environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation.

    Jonathan W. Kelly;Timothy P. McNamara;Bobby Bodenheimer;Thomas H. Carr

  • A Comparison of Distance Estimation in HMD-Based Virtual Environments with Different HMD-Based Conditions

    Lauren E. Buck;Mary K. Young;Bobby Bodenheimer

  • The influence of avatar (self and character) animations on distance estimation, object interaction and locomotion in immersive virtual environments

    Erin A. McManus;Bobby Bodenheimer;Stephan Streuber;Stephan de la Rosa

  • Computing the duration of motion transitions: an empirical approach

    Jing Wang;Bobby Bodenheimer

  • A comparison of two cost-differentiated virtual reality systems for perception and action tasks

    Mary K. Young;Graham B. Gaylor;Scott M. Andrus;Bobby Bodenheimer

  • Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologies

    Unknown

  • Depth Perception in Augmented Reality: The Effects of Display, Shadow, and Position

    Unknown

  • Distance estimation in virtual and real environments using bisection

    Bobby Bodenheimer;Jingjing Meng;Haojie Wu;Gayathri Narasimham

  • Intelligent user interface design for teachable agent systems

    J. Davis;K. Leelawong;K. Belynne;B. Bodenheimer

  • Cartoon textures

    Christina de Juan;Bobby Bodenheimer

  • Mixed H 2 and H ∞ control

    Kemin Zhou;John Doyle;Keith Glover;Bobby Bodenheimer

Frequent Co-Authors

John J. Rieser
John J. Rieser Vanderbilt University
Timothy P. McNamara
Timothy P. McNamara Vanderbilt University
Sarah H. Creem-Regehr
Sarah H. Creem-Regehr University of Utah
Jeanine K. Stefanucci
Jeanine K. Stefanucci University of Utah
Thomas H. Carr
Thomas H. Carr Michigan State University
Julie A. Adams
Julie A. Adams Oregon State University
John C. Doyle
John C. Doyle California Institute of Technology
Benoit M. Dawant
Benoit M. Dawant Vanderbilt University
Kemin Zhou
Kemin Zhou Shandong University of Science and Technology
Keith Glover
Keith Glover University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens a wide array of online education and career options. For students seeking flexibility and faster completion, an accelerated computer science degree online can be an excellent path. These programs are designed to help you earn your degree in less time, perfect for working professionals or those eager to enter the workforce quickly.

Computer Science also intersects with engineering and environmental fields. If you have an interest in sustainable technology, pursuing environmental engineering schools online may align with your interests and budget. Mechanical engineering is another lucrative career, and understanding mechanical engineering degree online cost can help you plan your education financially.

Graduates with technical degrees enjoy versatile career pathways. Curious about cross-disciplinary opportunities? See what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree to discover how technology and science blend in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Bobby Bodenheimer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles