World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7032
World Ranking
7647
National Ranking
3313

Gerd Bruder publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerd Bruder sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 210 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gerd Bruder D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerd Bruder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerd Bruder is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States and has a research focus in the field of Computer Science, with 54 publications. Their work spans several subfields, notably Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's research covers prominent topics including Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Augmented Reality Applications, Interactive and Immersive Displays, Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), as well as Artificial Intelligence in Service Interactions.

Gerd Bruder's recent papers include the following:

  • The Eye in Extended Reality: A Survey on Gaze Interaction and Eye Tracking in Head-worn Extended Reality, 2022, ACM Computing Surveys
  • A Systematic Review of Ten Years of Research on Human Interaction with Social Robots, 2020, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  • Exploring the Limitations of Environment Lighting on Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays, 2020, Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
  • Real Walking through Virtual Environments by Redirection Techniques, 2024, Hochschule Düsseldorf
  • Effects of Dark Mode Graphics on Visual Acuity and Fatigue with Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays, 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Gerd Bruder include Greg Welch, Kangsoo Kim, Austin Erickson, Nahal Norouzi, and Zubin Choudhary. The scientist has published numerous articles alongside these colleagues, contributing to their fields of study.

Gerd Bruder's work appears in several prominent publication venues. The most frequent venues include the 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Eurographics, Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, and Hochschule Düsseldorf.

In addition to journal and conference articles, Bruder has contributed to book publications released by Springer Science+Business Media, including works titled Advances in Visual Computing published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Estimation of Detection Thresholds for Redirected Walking Techniques

    F. Steinicke;G. Bruder;J. Jerald;H. Frenz

  • Revisiting Trends in Augmented Reality Research: A Review of the 2nd Decade of ISMAR (2008–2017)

    Kangsoo Kim;Mark Billinghurst;Gerd Bruder;Henry Been-Lirn Duh

  • 15 Years of Research on Redirected Walking in Immersive Virtual Environments

    Niels Christian Nilsson;Tabitha Peck;Gerd Bruder;Eri Hodgson

  • The Eye in Extended Reality: A Survey on Gaze Interaction and Eye Tracking in Head-worn Extended Reality

    Unknown

  • A taxonomy for deploying redirection techniques in immersive virtual environments

    Evan A. Suma;Gerd Bruder;Frank Steinicke;David M. Krum

  • Does a Digital Assistant Need a Body? The Influence of Visual Embodiment and Social Behavior on the Perception of Intelligent Virtual Agents in AR

    Kangsoo Kim;Luke Boelling;Steffen Haesler;Jeremy Bailenson

  • Analyses of human sensitivity to redirected walking

    Frank Steinicke;Gerd Bruder;Jason Jerald;Harald Frenz

  • Arch-Explore: A natural user interface for immersive architectural walkthroughs

    Gerd Bruder;Frank Steinicke;Klaus H. Hinrichs

  • In the blink of an eye: leveraging blink-induced suppression for imperceptible position and orientation redirection in virtual reality

    Eike Langbehn;Frank Steinicke;Markus Lappe;Gregory F. Welch

  • Bending the Curve: Sensitivity to Bending of Curved Paths and Application in Room-Scale VR

    Eike Langbehn;Paul Lubos;Gerd Bruder;Frank Steinicke

  • Cognitive Resource Demands of Redirected Walking

    Gerd Bruder;Paul Lubas;Frank Steinicke

  • Virtual proxemics: Locomotion in the presence of obstacles in large immersive projection environments

    Ferran Argelaguet Sanz;Anne-Helene Olivier;Gerd Bruder;Julien Pettre

  • Taxonomy and Implementation of Redirection Techniques for Ubiquitous Passive Haptic Feedback

    F. Steinicke;G. Bruder;L. Kohli;J. Jerald

  • Transitional environments enhance distance perception in immersive virtual reality systems

    Frank Steinicke;Gerd Bruder;Klaus Hinrichs;Markus Lappe

  • Analysis of direct selection in head-mounted display environments

    Paul Lubos;Gerd Bruder;Frank Steinicke

  • 2d touching of 3d stereoscopic objects

    Dimitar Valkov;Frank Steinicke;Gerd Bruder;Klaus Hinrichs

  • Geometric Calibration of Head-Mounted Displays and its Effects on Distance Estimation

    F. Kellner;B. Bolte;G. Bruder;U. Rautenberg

  • Redirecting Walking and Driving for Natural Navigation in Immersive Virtual Environments

    G. Bruder;V. Interrante;L. Phillips;F. Steinicke

  • Does a Gradual Transition to the Virtual World increase Presence

    Frank Steinicke;Gerd Bruder;Klaus Hinrichs;Anthony Steed

  • To touch or not to touch?: comparing 2D touch and 3D mid-air interaction on stereoscopic tabletop surfaces

    Gerd Bruder;Frank Steinicke;Wolfgang Sturzlinger

  • Real Walking through Virtual Environments by Redirection Techniques

    Frank Steinicke;Gerd Bruder;Klaus H. Hinrichs;Jason Jerald

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Steinicke
Frank Steinicke Universität Hamburg
Klaus Hinrichs
Klaus Hinrichs University of Münster
Greg Welch
Greg Welch University of Central Florida
Markus Lappe
Markus Lappe University of Münster
Jeremy N. Bailenson
Jeremy N. Bailenson Stanford University
Joseph J. LaViola
Joseph J. LaViola University of Central Florida
Anthony Steed
Anthony Steed University College London
Anatole Lécuyer
Anatole Lécuyer French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Victoria Interrante
Victoria Interrante University of Minnesota
Antonio Krüger
Antonio Krüger German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open the door to a variety of tech-centered careers. Many students consider pursuing the cheapest online physics degree to gain a strong scientific foundation that supports further study in computer science, engineering, or data analysis.

For those drawn to data-driven roles, choosing an affordable data science degree can offer practical skills in statistics, programming, and machine learning—vital for today's job market.

If you are interested in technical design, accredited online electrical engineering programs build expertise that complements computer science, especially in areas like hardware development, embedded systems, and robotics.

Want a faster path into tech? Look for short certificate programs that pay well. These options, such as coding bootcamps or IT certifications, can be completed in months and quickly boost your employability.

Choosing the right educational pathway depends on your career interests, goals, and financial needs. Explore these related online degrees and programs to find the best fit for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Gerd Bruder

Trending Scientists