World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
France
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
15342
World Ranking
3788
National Ranking
71

Anatole Lécuyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anatole Lécuyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 340 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anatole Lécuyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anatole Lécuyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award

Overview

Anatole Lécuyer is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research spans several interconnected fields, focusing primarily on neuroscience and computer science.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Science

Within these, their work extensively covers subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation

Lécuyer's research topics are diverse, with a strong emphasis on virtual reality and brain-computer interfaces. Key topics in their portfolio are:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

They have contributed to several recent papers, notable for their contemporary relevance and publication in respected venues. Among them are:

  • "Avatar and Sense of Embodiment: Studying the Relative Preference Between Appearance, Control and Point of View," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Being an Avatar "for Real": A Survey on Virtual Embodiment in Augmented Reality," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "A Survey on the Use of Haptic Feedback for Brain-Computer Interfaces and Neurofeedback," 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • ""Haptics On-Demand": A Survey on Encountered-Type Haptic Displays," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Haptics
  • "A Multi-Target Motor Imagery Training Using Bimodal EEG-fMRI Neurofeedback: A Pilot Study in Chronic Stroke Patients," 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Lécuyer frequently publishes in specific venues, including:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Haptics

The scientist collaborates regularly with a set of co-authors over multiple publications. Key frequent co-authors include:

  • Ferran Argelaguet
  • I. Bonan
  • Justine Saint-Aubert
  • Mélanie Cogné
  • Mathis Fleury

Best Publications

  • A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces

    Fabien Lotte;Marco Congedo;Anatole Lécuyer;Fabrice Lamarche

  • Openvibe: An open-source software platform to design, test, and use brain--computer interfaces in real and virtual environments

    Yann Renard;Fabien Lotte;Guillaume Gibert;Marco Congedo

  • Pseudo-haptic feedback: can isometric input devices simulate force feedback?

    A. Lecuyer;S. Coquillart;A. Kheddar;P. Richard

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces, Virtual Reality, and Videogames

    A. Lecuyer;F. Lotte;R.B. Reilly;R. Leeb

  • Simulating haptic feedback using vision: A survey of research and applications of pseudo-haptic feedback

    Anatole Lécuyer

  • The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: Effects of the virtual hand representation

    Ferran Argelaguet;Ludovic Hoyet;Michael Trico;Anatole Lecuyer

  • Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: the perception of pseudo-haptic textures

    Anatole Lécuyer;Jean-Marie Burkhardt;Laurent Etienne

  • Novice Shooters With Lower Pre-shooting Alpha Power Have Better Performance During Competition in a Virtual Reality Scenario

    Michael Pereira;Ferran Argelaguet;José del R. Millán;Anatole Lécuyer

  • Two Brains, One Game: Design and Evaluation of a Multiuser BCI Video Game Based on Motor Imagery

    L. Bonnet;F. Lotte;A. Lecuyer

  • Combining BCI with Virtual Reality: Towards New Applications and Improved BCI

    Fabien Lotte;Josef Faller;Christoph Guger;Yann Renard

  • Influence of control/display ratio on the perception of mass of manipulated objects in virtual environments

    L. Dominjon;A. Lecuyer;J.-M. Burkhardt;P. Richard

  • Using an Eye-Tracking System to Improve Camera Motions and Depth-of-Field Blur Effects in Virtual Environments

    S. Hillaire;A. Lecuyer;R. Cozot;G. Casiez

  • Classification of movement intention by spatially filtered electromagnetic inverse solutions

    Marco Congedo;Fabien Lotte;Anatole Lécuyer

  • Depth-of-Field Blur Effects for First-Person Navigation in Virtual Environments

    S. Hillaire;A. Lecuyer;R. Cozot;G. Casiez

  • The "Bubble" technique: interacting with large virtual environments using haptic devices with limited workspace

    L. Dominjon;A. Lecuyer;J.-M. Burkhardt;G. Andrade-Barroso

  • Avatar and Sense of Embodiment: Studying the Relative Preference Between Appearance, Control and Point of View

    Rebecca Fribourg;Ferran Argelaguet;Anatole Lecuyer;Ludovic Hoyet

  • HOMERE: a multimodal system for visually impaired people to explore virtual environments

    A. Lecuyer;P. Mobuchon;C. Megard;J. Perret

  • Comparative study of band-power extraction techniques for Motor Imagery classification

    Nicolas Brodu;Fabien Lotte;Anatole Lecuyer

  • An overview of research on "passive" brain-computer interfaces for implicit human-computer interaction

    Laurent George;Anatole Lécuyer

  • Towards BCI-Based Interfaces for Augmented Reality: Feasibility, Design and Evaluation

    Hakim Si-Mohammed;Jimmy Petit;Camille Jeunet;Ferran Argelaguet

  • Classifying EEG for brain computer interfaces using Gaussian processes

    Mingjun Zhong;Fabien Lotte;Mark Girolami;Anatole Lécuyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Maud Marchal
Maud Marchal French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Ferran Argelaguet
Ferran Argelaguet Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires
Fabien Lotte
Fabien Lotte French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Christian Barillot
Christian Barillot Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires
Eric Marchand
Eric Marchand University of Rennes
Claudio Pacchierotti
Claudio Pacchierotti Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Marco Congedo
Marco Congedo Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Hiroyuki Kajimoto
Hiroyuki Kajimoto University of Electro-Communications
Victoria Interrante
Victoria Interrante University of Minnesota
Edouard Gentaz
Edouard Gentaz University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a Computer Science degree in the USA, there are a variety of flexible online programs that can support your educational and career goals. Entry-level students may want to explore associate degrees, which offer a quick way to gain foundational IT and programming skills. These credentials can lead to immediate job opportunities or provide a pathway to further study.

For those seeking advanced expertise, there are many affordable masters programs in computer science and related fields available online. These programs help professionals stay competitive in evolving tech industries while balancing other commitments.

Ambitious learners might consider doctoral-level online options, such as a doctorate organizational leadership online, to move into academic, research, or high-level management roles. Likewise, the best online edd programs can prepare graduates for leadership in higher education or technology-driven organizations.

Online degree programs deliver both flexibility and affordability, making higher education in computer science—and beyond—accessible for learners worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Anatole Lécuyer

Trending Scientists