World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frode Stordal

Frode Stordal

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
13173
World Ranking
2925
National Ranking
32

Frode Stordal publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frode Stordal sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 232 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Frode Stordal D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frode Stordal sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frode Stordal is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a notable focus on Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science among subfields.

Their work addresses a range of topics encompassing:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Climate variability and models
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds

They have authored several recent papers, among them:

  • Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic, 2020, published in Nature Climate Change
  • Evaluating global and regional land warming trends in the past decades with both MODIS and ERA5-Land land surface temperature data, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • The distribution limit of the common tick, Ixodes ricinus, and some associated pathogens in north-western Europe, 2020, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
  • Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes, 2022, Global Change Biology
  • Direct and indirect impacts of climate change on wheat yield in the Indo-Gangetic plain in India, 2021, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research

Frequent co-authors they have collaborated with include:

  • Anders Bryn
  • Hui Tang
  • Jarle W. Bjerke
  • Frans-Jan W. Parmentier
  • Ane V. Vollsnes

Their publications are often found in journals such as:

  • Global Change Biology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Biogeosciences
  • Environmental Research Letters

Best Publications

  • RegCM4 : model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains

    F. Giorgi;E. Coppola;F. Solmon;L. Mariotti

  • New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases

    Gunnar Myhre;Eleanor J. Highwood;Keith P. Shine;Frode Stordal

  • Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic

    Isla H. Myers-Smith;Jeffrey T. Kerby;Gareth K. Phoenix;Jarle W. Bjerke

  • Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: an update on IPCC (1999)

    Robert Sausen;Ivar Isaksen;Volker Grewe;Didier Hauglustaine

  • A Lagrangian Long Range Transport Model with Atmospheric Boundary Layer Chemistry

    Anton Eliassen;Jørgen Saltbones;Frode Stordal;Frode Stordal;Øystein Hov;Øystein Hov

  • Assessment of the performance of CORDEX Regional Climate Models in Simulating East African Rainfall

    Hussen Seid Endris;Philip Omondi;Suman Jain;Christopher Lennard

  • Observations of 1,1‐difluoroethane (HFC‐152a) at AGAGE and SOGE monitoring stations in 1994–2004 and derived global and regional emission estimates

    B. R. Greally;A. J. Manning;S. Reimann;A. McCulloch

  • Evaluating global and regional land warming trends in the past decades with both MODIS and ERA5-Land land surface temperature data

    Unknown

  • Boundary-Layer Ozone Depletion as Seen in the Norwegian Arctic in Spring

    Sverre Solberg;Norbert Schmidbauer;Arne Semb;Frode Stordal

  • Estimation of the direct radiative forcing due to sulfate and soot aerosols

    Gunnar Myhre;Frode Stordal;Knut Restad;Ivar S. A. Isaksen

  • Air quality trends in Europe over the past decade: a first multi-model assessment

    Augustin Colette;Claire Granier;Øivind Hodnebrog;Hermann Jakobs

  • Climatic and societal impacts of a volcanic double event at the dawn of the Middle Ages

    Matthew Toohey;Matthew Toohey;Kirstin Krüger;Michael Sigl;Michael Sigl;Frode Stordal

  • Modeling the radiative impact of mineral dust during the Saharan Dust Experiment (SHADE) campaign

    Gunnar Myhre;Gunnar Myhre;Alf Grini;James M. Haywood;Frode Stordal;Frode Stordal

  • Global sensitivity experiments of the radiative forcing due to mineral aerosols

    Gunnar Myhre;Frode Stordal

  • Aerosol-cloud interaction inferred from MODIS satellite data and global aerosol models

    Gunnar Myhre;Gunnar Myhre;Frode Stordal;Frode Stordal;M Johnsrud;YJ Kaufman

  • Effects of anthropogenic emissions on tropospheric ozone and its radiative forcing

    T. K. Berntsen;I. S. A. Isaksen;G. Myhre;J. S. Fuglestvedt

  • Model calculations of the relative effects of CFCs and their replacements on stratospheric ozone

    Donald A. Fisher;Charles H. Hales;David L. Filkin;Malcolm K. W. Ko

  • A new numerical model of the middle atmosphere: 1. Dynamics and transport of tropospheric source gases

    Rolando R. Garcia;Frode Stordal;Susan Solomon;Jeffrey T. Kiehl

  • Comparison of the radiative properties and direct radiative effect of aerosols from a global aerosol model and remote sensing data over ocean

    Gunnar Myhre;Gunnar Myhre;Nicolas Bellouin;Tore F. Berglen;Terje K. Berntsen

  • The effect of global warming and global cooling on the distribution of the latest Permian climate zones

    Marco Roscher;Marco Roscher;Frode Stordal;Henrik Svensen

  • Is there a trend in cirrus cloud cover due to aircraft traffic

    F. Stordal;F. Stordal;G. Myhre;G. Myhre;E. J. G. Stordal;W. B. Rossow

  • Air quality trends in Europe over the past decade: a first multimodel assessment

    Augustin Colette;B. Bessagnet;Ariela d'Angiola;M. Gauss

Frequent Co-Authors

Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Ivar S. A. Isaksen
Ivar S. A. Isaksen University of Oslo
Terje Berntsen
Terje Berntsen University of Oslo
Yvan J. Orsolini
Yvan J. Orsolini Norwegian Institute for Air Research
Øivind Hodnebrog
Øivind Hodnebrog Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Lena M. Tallaksen
Lena M. Tallaksen University of Oslo
Jón Egill Kristjánsson
Jón Egill Kristjánsson University of Oslo
Øystein Hov
Øystein Hov Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Michael Gauss
Michael Gauss Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Daniel R. Marsh
Daniel R. Marsh National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree related to Environmental Sciences can open diverse career opportunities, and exploring complementary online programs can enhance your expertise. For those interested in understanding societal impacts on the environment, earning the best online bachelor degree in sociology can be valuable. Sociology offers critical insights into human behavior, which is essential for addressing environmental challenges.

Education professionals looking to advance their careers might consider advanced degrees without the need for a dissertation. Programs highlighted under education doctoral programs without dissertation provide flexible options for educators focusing on environmental education or policy development.

Additionally, if you are an educator seeking to elevate your qualifications, exploring the best eds to edd programs offers a structured path from a Doctor of Education (EdD) to advanced leadership roles in academia and related sectors.

For those interested in social advocacy or community work within environmental contexts, pursuing online dsw programs in social work can help develop skills to support vulnerable populations affected by environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Frode Stordal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles