World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
101
Citations
63106
World Ranking
347
National Ranking
25

Piers M. Forster publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piers M. Forster sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 345 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Piers M. Forster D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piers M. Forster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2019 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Piers M. Forster is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant contributions to subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Economics and Econometrics, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

The scientist has authored numerous publications, including several recent papers notable for their citation impact and relevance to climate science and atmospheric studies. Among these are:

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020 (2020), published in Earth System Science Data
  • The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2020), published in Atmospheric Environment
  • An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence (2020), published in Reviews of Geophysics
  • Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19 (2020), published in Nature Climate Change
  • Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models (2020), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Frequent co-authors in Forster's work include Joeri Rogelj, Robin Lamboll, Chris Smith, Gunnar Myhre, and Glen P. Peters. Collaboration with these researchers has contributed to advancing knowledge in climate forcing, atmospheric chemistry, and environmental modeling.

The scientist's research has appeared in several publication venues, notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Earth System Science Data
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Nature Climate Change

The primary topics covered by Forster's work encompass Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Climate Variability and Models, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, COVID-19 Impact on Air Quality, Climate Change Policy and Economics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, and Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies.

In recognition of their scientific contributions, Forster was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2

    P. Forster;V. Ramaswamy;P. Artaxo;T. Berntsen

  • Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment

    Tami C. Bond;Sarah J. Doherty;D. W. Fahey;Piers Forster

  • Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing

    Piers Forster;Venkatachalam Ramaswamy;Paulo Artaxo;Terje Berntsen

  • Clouds and Aerosols

    Olivier Boucher;David Randall;Paulo Artaxo;Christopher Bretherton

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Michael O'Sullivan;Matthew W. Jones;Robbie M. Andrew

  • The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018

    D.S. Lee;D.W. Fahey;A. Skowron;M.R. Allen

  • Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century.

    David S. Lee;David W. Fahey;Piers M. Forster;Peter J. Newton

  • Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing

    K.S. Carslaw;Lindsay Lee;C.L. Reddington;K.J. Pringle

  • An assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence

    S C Sherwood;M J Webb;J D Annan;K C Armour

  • Clouds and Aerosols

    O. Boucher;D. Randall;P. Artaxo;C. Bretherton

  • Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change

    Nicolas Bellouin;Johannes Quaas;Edward Gryspeerdt;Stefan Kinne

  • Global Carbon and other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks

    Josep G. Canadell;Pedro M.S. Monteiro;Marcos H. Costa;Leticia Cotrim Da Cunha

  • Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19

    Piers M. Forster;Harriet I. Forster;Mat J. Evans;Matthew J. Gidden

  • Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C

    Richard J. Millar;Richard J. Millar;Jan S. Fuglestvedt;Pierre Friedlingstein;Joeri Rogelj;Joeri Rogelj

  • The semi‐direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols on marine stratocumulus

    B. T. Johnson;K. P. Shine;P. M. Forster

  • Chemistry and the Linkages between Air Quality and Climate Change.

    Erika von Schneidemesser;Paul S. Monks;James D. Allan;Lori Bruhwiler

  • Stratospheric water vapour changes as a possible contributor to observed stratospheric cooling

    Piers M. de F. Forster;Keith P. Shine

  • Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint on the global secondary organic aerosol budget

    D. V. Spracklen;J. L. Jimenez;K. S. Carslaw;D. R. Worsnop

  • Assessing the climate impact of trends in stratospheric water vapor

    Piers M. de F. Forster;K. P. Shine

  • Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes

    Piers M. de F. Forster;Keith P. Shine

  • Impact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS composition and related radiative effects

    Martin Riese;F. Ploeger;A. Rap;B. Vogel

Frequent Co-Authors

Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Joeri Rogelj
Joeri Rogelj Imperial College London
Olivier Boucher
Olivier Boucher Sorbonne University
Alexandru Rap
Alexandru Rap University of Leeds
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University
Keith P. Shine
Keith P. Shine University of Reading
Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford
Toshihiko Takemura
Toshihiko Takemura Kyushu University
Kenneth S. Carslaw
Kenneth S. Carslaw University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of related educational and career opportunities. For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond environmental science, exploring the dsw programs online can offer valuable skills in social work, emphasizing community and environmental justice.

Students seeking versatile, broad-based education might consider the cheapest online general studies degree programs, which provide comprehensive knowledge that complements environmental studies while fitting diverse career goals.

For those who prefer a more straightforward academic path, researching the easiest bachelor's degree options online can help identify flexible programs that still align well with environmental career pathways.

Specialized fields such as geology play a critical role in environmental science. The best online geology degree programs offer focused training on earth sciences, enhancing opportunities in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation.

Best Scientists Citing Piers M. Forster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles