World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 85 733 696 60 58 288 39575

Jim Haywood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jim Haywood between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jim Haywood published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 12.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2022. 29 of the 405 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2022. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 26 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

405 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jim Haywood: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 3
1998 6
1999 2
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 26
2004 5
2005 6
2006 2
2007 12
2008 14
2009 9
2010 10
2011 18
2012 11
2013 18
2014 12
2015 14
2016 15
2017 13
2018 13
2019 19
2020 16
2021 27
2022 37
2023 34
2024 27
2025 28
2026 1
Total 405
Download as CSV

Jim Haywood publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Haywood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 288 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130 288
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Jim Haywood D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Haywood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43 85
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Jim Haywood is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields primarily focused on environmental and earth sciences, with significant contributions to the study of atmospheric and planetary processes.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Their research extends into specific subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Economics and Econometrics

Within these areas, several core topics have featured prominently in their publications, including:

  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Jim Haywood's recent notable papers reflect their focus on aerosol-cloud interactions and climate forcing. Some selected recent publications include:

  • "A review of SWAT applications, performance and future needs for simulation of hydro-climatic extremes" (2020), Advances in Water Resources
  • "An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin" (2021), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "The CLoud-Aerosol-Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign" (2021), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "The 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption - Part 01: Dispersion model simulations and satellite retrievals of volcanic sulfur dioxide" (2021), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Machine learning reveals climate forcing from aerosols is dominated by increased cloud cover" (2022), Nature Geoscience

Their publications have appeared frequently in prominent venues such as:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Nature Geoscience
  • Research Square
  • Science Advances
  • Earth's Future

Throughout their career, Jim Haywood has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Andy Jones
  • Ju Liang
  • Daniele Visioni
  • Hugh Coe
  • Daniel G. Partridge

Their work encompasses observational campaigns, modeling studies, and machine learning applications aimed at advancing the understanding of atmospheric processes, particularly regarding aerosols and their interactions with clouds and climate.

Best Publications

  • Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2

    P. Forster;V. Ramaswamy;P. Artaxo;T. Berntsen

  • Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing

    Piers Forster;Venkatachalam Ramaswamy;Paulo Artaxo;Terje Berntsen

  • Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review

    James Haywood;Olivier Boucher

  • Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change

    Nicolas Bellouin;Johannes Quaas;Edward Gryspeerdt;Stefan Kinne

  • The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget

    J. M. Haywood;K. P. Shine

  • Global estimate of aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite measurements

    Nicolas Bellouin;Olivier Boucher;Jim Haywood;M. Shekar Reddy

  • Global sensitivity studies of the direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic sulfate and black carbon aerosols

    J. M. Haywood;V. Ramaswamy

  • Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2‐ES and the role of ammonium nitrate

    Nicolas Bellouin;Jamie Rae;Andy Jones;Colin Johnson

  • Radiative properties and direct radiative effect of Saharan dust measured by the C-130 aircraft during SHADE: 1. Solar spectrum

    Jim Haywood;Pete Francis;Simon Osborne;Martin Glew

  • Tropospheric Aerosol Climate Forcing in Clear-Sky Satellite Observations over the Oceans

    J. M. Haywood;Venkatachalam Ramaswamy;B. J. Soden

  • Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall

    Jim M. Haywood;Jim M. Haywood;Andy Jones;Nicolas Bellouin;Nicolas Bellouin;David Stephenson

  • Satellite-observed pollution from Southern Hemisphere biomass burning.

    D. P. Edwards;L. K. Emmons;J. C. Gille;A. Chu

  • Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals

    Mark G. Lawrence;Stefan Schãfer;Helene Muri;Helene Muri;Vivian Scott

  • A review of SWAT applications, performance and future needs for simulation of hydro-climatic extremes

    Mou Leong Tan;Philip W. Gassman;Xiaoying Yang;James Haywood

  • Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

    Ben Kravitz;Ken Caldeira;Olivier Boucher;Alan Robock

  • The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

    Simone Tilmes;John Fasullo;Jean-Francois Lamarque;Daniel R. Marsh

  • The mean physical and optical properties of regional haze dominated by biomass burning aerosol measured from the C-130 aircraft during SAFARI 2000

    Jim M. Haywood;Simon R. Osborne;Pete N. Francis;Andreas Keil

  • General Circulation Model Calculations of the Direct Radiative Forcing by Anthropogenic Sulfate and Fossil-Fuel Soot Aerosol

    J. M. Haywood;D. L. Roberts;A. Slingo;J. M. Edwards

  • Multi-spectral calculations of the direct radiative forcing of tropospheric sulphate and soot aerosols using a column model

    J. M. Haywood;K. P. Shine

  • Solar radiative forcing by biomass burning aerosol particles during SAFARI 2000: A case study based on measured aerosol and cloud properties

    Andreas Keil;Jim M. Haywood

  • Aging of biomass burning aerosols over West Africa: Aircraft measurements of chemical composition, microphysical properties, and emission ratios

    Gerard Capes;Ben Johnson;G. McFiggans;P. I. Williams

  • Can desert dust explain the outgoing longwave radiation anomaly over the Sahara during July 2003

    Jim M. Haywood;Richard P. Allan;Ian Culverwell;Tony Slingo

  • Strong constraints on aerosol–cloud interactions from volcanic eruptions

    Florent F. Malavelle;Jim M. Haywood;Jim M. Haywood;Andy Jones;Andrew Gettelman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Johnson
Ben Johnson Met Office
Olivier Boucher
Olivier Boucher Sorbonne University
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Nicolas Bellouin
Nicolas Bellouin University of Reading
Paola Formenti
Paola Formenti Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
James Allan
James Allan University of Manchester
Paulo Artaxo
Paulo Artaxo Universidade de São Paulo
Eleanor J. Highwood
Eleanor J. Highwood University of Reading
Ben Kravitz
Ben Kravitz Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree options can enhance career prospects. Public administration plays a crucial role in environmental policy and management. Pursuing 1 year mpa programs offers a fast-track option to gain essential leadership skills necessary for driving sustainable projects and influencing environmental regulations.

Understanding societal dynamics is equally important in addressing environmental challenges. A sociology bachelor degree online provides valuable insights into human behavior, community development, and social justice, which complement environmental studies well.

Educators looking to impact environmental awareness through teaching can consider advanced degrees. Online doctoral programs like those featuring an edd no dissertation requirement cater to professionals seeking a terminal degree without the traditional dissertation, making it more accessible while maintaining academic rigor.

For a seamless academic journey from master’s to doctorate, exploring the best online eds to edd programs can help educators and environmental advocates enhance their qualifications efficiently, contributing to stronger educational frameworks and community outreach in sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Haywood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles