What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Asthma
- Surgery
Lynn M. Taussig mostly deals with Asthma, Pediatrics, Respiratory sounds, Atopy and Internal medicine.
The concepts of his Asthma study are interwoven with issues in Corticosteroid, Anesthesia and Randomized controlled trial.
His Pediatrics research integrates issues from Odds ratio, Respiratory disease, Respiratory tract, Prospective cohort study and Risk factor.
The various areas that Lynn M. Taussig examines in his Prospective cohort study study include El Niño and Breast feeding.
As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Respiratory sounds, focusing on Budesonide and, on occasion, Leukotriene receptor.
As part of his research on Atopy, studies on Allergy and Immunology are part of the effort.
His most cited work include:
- Asthma and wheezing in the first six years of life. The Group Health Medical Associates. (3220 citations)
- Respiratory syncytial virus in early life and risk of wheeze and allergy by age 13 years. (1361 citations)
- Long-term inhaled corticosteroids in preschool children at high risk for asthma. (855 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Pediatrics, Asthma, Internal medicine, Immunology and Cystic fibrosis.
His Pediatrics research includes themes of Respiratory disease, Respiratory sounds, Respiratory tract, Prospective cohort study and Risk factor.
His work in Risk factor covers topics such as Odds ratio which are related to areas like Confidence interval.
His Asthma research incorporates elements of Anesthesia and Allergy.
His work on Montelukast as part of general Internal medicine study is frequently linked to Exhaled nitric oxide, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His study explores the link between Immunology and topics such as Respiratory system that cross with problems in Airway.
He most often published in these fields:
- Pediatrics (39.67%)
- Asthma (30.43%)
- Internal medicine (25.54%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2017)?
- Asthma (30.43%)
- Pediatrics (39.67%)
- Internal medicine (25.54%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Asthma, Pediatrics, Internal medicine, Anesthesia and Lung.
Lynn M. Taussig combines subjects such as Exacerbation and Randomized controlled trial with his study of Asthma.
His study in Pediatrics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Respiratory sounds, Budesonide, Prospective cohort study and Cohort study.
His studies deal with areas such as Airway, Immunology and Cardiology as well as Internal medicine.
The various areas that Lynn M. Taussig examines in his Anesthesia study include Corticosteroid and Placebo.
Lynn M. Taussig has researched Lung in several fields, including Concomitant, Asymptomatic, Cystic fibrosis and Pulmonary function testing.
Between 2006 and 2017, his most popular works were:
- Step-up Therapy for Children with Uncontrolled Asthma Receiving Inhaled Corticosteroids (327 citations)
- International consensus on (ICON) pediatric asthma (258 citations)
- Long-term comparison of 3 controller regimens for mild-moderate persistent childhood asthma: The Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial (245 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Disease
His primary areas of study are Asthma, Internal medicine, Anesthesia, Montelukast and Exacerbation.
His Asthma research incorporates themes from Randomized controlled trial and Intensive care medicine.
Lynn M. Taussig combines subjects such as First year of life and Cardiology with his study of Internal medicine.
His work deals with themes such as Corticosteroid and Placebo, which intersect with Anesthesia.
His Montelukast research includes themes of Salmeterol and Leukotriene E4.
His research investigates the connection between Respiratory sounds and topics such as Regimen that intersect with issues in Pediatrics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
