World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth M. Greenwood

Kenneth M. Greenwood

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6426 5982 375 366 116 8558

Kenneth M. Greenwood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth M. Greenwood between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth M. Greenwood published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2004. 1 of the 127 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2004. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

127 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth M. Greenwood: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 4
1991 4
1992 1
1993 1
1994 5
1995 8
1996 4
1997 1
1998 6
1999 1
2000 5
2001 5
2002 3
2003 5
2004 9
2005 7
2006 5
2007 2
2008 3
2009 2
2010 6
2011 7
2012 4
2013 3
2014 2
2015 4
2016 6
2017 2
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 4
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 127
Download as CSV

Kenneth M. Greenwood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth M. Greenwood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 116
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kenneth M. Greenwood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth M. Greenwood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Statistics

His main research concerns Clinical psychology, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Medical education, Intelligence quotient and Meta-analysis. His work on Coping as part of his general Clinical psychology study is frequently connected to Hallucinating, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His research integrates issues of Rehabilitation, Physical therapy and Reliability, Intraclass correlation in his study of Physical medicine and rehabilitation.

The concepts of his Medical education study are interwoven with issues in School teachers, Pedagogy, Occupational voice and Library science. His Intelligence quotient research includes themes of Borderline intellectual functioning, Young adult, Developmental psychology, Verbal reasoning and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. He combines subjects such as Cognitive skill, Sedative, Psychiatry, Treatment and control groups and Sleep onset with his study of Meta-analysis.

His most cited work include:

  • Identifying effective psychological treatments for insomnia: A meta-analysis. (492 citations)
  • Cognitive Effects of Long-Term Benzodiazepine Use: A Meta-Analysis (387 citations)
  • Prevalence of voice problems in teachers (289 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Physical therapy, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry, Developmental psychology and Rehabilitation. Kenneth M. Greenwood has included themes like Stroke, Depression and Scale in his Physical therapy study. The various areas that Kenneth M. Greenwood examines in his Clinical psychology study include Psychological intervention and Psychotherapist.

His Developmental psychology study also includes

  • Attribution which intersects with area such as Parenting stress and Occupational therapy,
  • Social psychology and related Intervention. His work in Rehabilitation addresses subjects such as Physical medicine and rehabilitation, which are connected to disciplines such as Rasch model, Outcome assessment and Intraclass correlation. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Meta-analysis and Audiology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Physical therapy (25.00%)
  • Clinical psychology (21.67%)
  • Psychiatry (15.00%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2021)?

  • Physical therapy (25.00%)
  • Depression (7.50%)
  • Distress (5.83%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Physical therapy, Depression, Distress, Social psychology and Anxiety. His Physical therapy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Psychological intervention, Quality of life, Randomized controlled trial, Sleep in non-human animals and Mindfulness. His Depression research incorporates themes from Test, Cancer and Clinical psychology.

His Clinical psychology study incorporates themes from Health professions and Management. He has researched Distress in several fields, including Exploratory research, Insomnia, Medical procedure, Distraction and Developmental psychology. His work focuses on many connections between Anxiety and other disciplines, such as Mental health, that overlap with his field of interest in Psychometrics.

Between 2010 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Relationships between measures of dysfunctional breathing in a population with concerns about their breathing. (45 citations)
  • Medically unexplained dyspnea: partly moderated by dysfunctional (thoracic dominant) breathing pattern. (37 citations)
  • Perspectives on the impact on vocal function of heavy vocal load among working professional music theater performers (36 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Statistics

Kenneth M. Greenwood mainly focuses on Distress, Breathing pattern, Breathing, Young adult and Singing. His study in Distress is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Mental health, Aerobic exercise and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression. His Breathing pattern research incorporates elements of Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Hyperventilation, Dysfunctional breathing and Breathing symptoms.

His work deals with themes such as Hyperventilation syndrome, Dysfunctional family, Physical examination and Respiratory system, which intersect with Breathing. His Young adult research is classified as research in Developmental psychology. His work carried out in the field of Singing brings together such families of science as Social psychology, Psychometrics and Voice Handicap Index.

Best Publications

  • Identifying effective psychological treatments for insomnia: A meta-analysis.

    Douglas R. R. Murtagh;Kenneth M. Greenwood

  • Cognitive Effects of Long-Term Benzodiazepine Use: A Meta-Analysis

    Melinda J. Barker;Kenneth M. Greenwood;Martin Jackson;Simon F. Crowe

  • Prevalence of voice problems in teachers

    Alison Russell;Jennifer Oates;Kenneth M. Greenwood

  • Vocal problems among teachers: a review of prevalence, causes, prevention, and treatment

    Jacqueline A. Mattiske;Jennifer M. Oates;Kenneth M. Greenwood

  • Persistence of cognitive effects after withdrawal from long-term benzodiazepine use: a meta-analysis.

    Melinda J Barker;Kenneth M Greenwood;Martin Jackson;Simon F Crowe

  • Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects.

    Thomas A. Matyas;Kenneth M. Greenwood

  • Research Methods for Nursing and Health Science

    Victor Minichiello;Gerard Sullivan;Kenneth Greenwood;Rita Axford

  • Intelligence and Duchenne muscular dystrophy: full-scale, verbal, and performance intelligence quotients.

    Sue Cotton;Nicholas J Voudouris;Kenneth M Greenwood

  • Self-reported voice problems among three groups of professional singers.

    Debra Jean Phyland;Jennifer Oates;Kenneth Mark Greenwood

  • The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations†

    Michael Robert Davis;Marilyn McMahon;Kenneth M Greenwood

  • A comparison of mothers' and fathers' experience of parenting stress and attributions for parent child interaction outcomes.

    Susan A. Esdaile;Susan A. Esdaile;Kenneth Mark Greenwood

  • Handbook of research methods for nursing and health science

    Victor. Minichiello;Rita. Axford;Gerard. Sullivan;Ken. Greenwood

  • Accuracy and Reliability of Observational Gait Analysis Data: Judgments of Push-off in Gait After Stroke

    Jennifer L McGinley;Patricia A Goldie;Kenneth M Greenwood;Sandra J Olney

  • Association between intellectual functioning and age in children and young adults with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: further results from a meta-analysis.

    Sue M Cotton;Nicholas J Voudouris;Kenneth M Greenwood

  • Coping with hallucinated voices in schizophrenia: a review of self-initiated strategies and therapeutic interventions.

    John Farhall;Kenneth Mark Greenwood;Kenneth Mark Greenwood;Henry J. Jackson

  • Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch system.

    K D Hill;P A Goldie;P A Baker;K M Greenwood

  • Long-term stability and psychometric properties of the Composite Scale of Morningness.

    Kenneth M. Greenwood

  • Intelligence and Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Full‐Scale, Verbal, and Performance intelligence quotients

    Unknown

  • Comparison of the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour in the Prediction of Dieting and Fasting Behaviour.

    Lillian M. Nejad;Eleanor H. Wertheim;Kenneth M. Greenwood

  • The high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Content validity and discriminability

    G. P. Williams;Val Robertson;K. M. Greenwood;P. A. Goldie

  • SLEEPING PATTERNS DURING PREGNANCY IN JAPANESE WOMEN

    Suzuki S;Dennerstein L;Greenwood Km;Armstrong Sm

Frequent Co-Authors

Meg E. Morris
Meg E. Morris La Trobe University
Julie F Pallant
Julie F Pallant Griffith University
Simon F. Crowe
Simon F. Crowe La Trobe University
Shane Thomas
Shane Thomas Australian National University
Grahame J Coleman
Grahame J Coleman University of Melbourne
Lorraine Dennerstein
Lorraine Dennerstein University of Melbourne
Ron Borland
Ron Borland University of Melbourne
Robert U. Newton
Robert U. Newton Edith Cowan University
Eleanor H. Wertheim
Eleanor H. Wertheim La Trobe University
Victor Minichiello
Victor Minichiello Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and career pathways beyond traditional roles. One popular choice is pursuing a career in speech-language pathology, which combines principles of psychology, language development, and health sciences. Each U.S. state has its own certification and licensure requirements. For example, learn more about South Dakota speech pathologist certification requirements to understand the education and training involved.

Exploring how to become a speech-language pathologist in different regions can help you plan your educational journey. Learn about the steps and qualifications needed for how to become a speech language pathologist in Tennessee. If you’re considering working in Texas, review the Texas slp certification requirements to ensure you meet all necessary standards.

For those interested in working in Utah, check the procedural roadmap for becoming a speech therapist in Utah. Whether you pursue an online psychology degree or focus on a specialized field like speech-language pathology, understanding state-specific criteria is essential for a successful career.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth M. Greenwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles