World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3563 3285 191 186 309 12421

Neil Thomas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Neil Thomas between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Neil Thomas published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2020. 34 of the 393 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2020. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 17 publications
1989 2025

393 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Neil Thomas: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 4
1998 2
1999 1
2000 4
2001 2
2002 3
2003 6
2004 3
2005 3
2006 4
2007 6
2008 13
2009 15
2010 15
2011 7
2012 17
2013 16
2014 22
2015 30
2016 27
2017 18
2018 20
2019 18
2020 35
2021 32
2022 15
2023 19
2024 17
2025 17
Total 393
Download as CSV

Neil Thomas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Thomas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 309 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 309
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Neil Thomas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Thomas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Neil Thomas is affiliated with Swinburne University of Technology in Australia, where their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work notably focuses on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and General Health Professions.

Their scholarly output includes significant contributions to topics such as Schizophrenia research and treatment, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Mental Health Research Topics, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, and Hallucinations in medical conditions.

A selection of recent papers authored or co-authored by Neil Thomas includes:

  • Review of the current empirical literature on using videoconferencing to deliver individual psychotherapies to adults with mental health problems, 2021, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • Subjective burden and perspectives of German healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Clozapine Combination and Augmentation Strategies in Patients With Schizophrenia -Recommendations From an International Expert Survey Among the Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Associations of longitudinal plasma p-tau181 and NfL with tau-PET, Aβ-PET and cognition, 2021, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • A Review of Multimodal Hallucinations: Categorization, Assessment, Theoretical Perspectives, and Clinical Recommendations, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin

Neil Thomas frequently collaborates with several researchers across their fields of study. These frequent co-authors include:

  • Alkomiet Hasan
  • Peter Falkai
  • Susan L. Rossell
  • Elias Wagner
  • Andrea Schmitt

Their research contributions have been published repeatedly in several specialized journals and publication venues. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • Psychiatry Research
  • JMIR Mental Health

Neil Thomas's research landscape reflects interdisciplinary expertise across clinical and cognitive psychological methodologies, with considerable focus on mental health disorders, treatment modalities, and digital interventions for psychotherapy delivery.

Best Publications

  • Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology.

    Oliver D. Howes;Rob McCutcheon;Ofer Agid;Andrea De Bartolomeis

  • Hippocampal Plasticity in Response to Exercise in Schizophrenia

    Frank-Gerald Pajonk;Thomas Wobrock;Oliver Gruber;Harald Scherk

  • Emerging Perspectives From the Hearing Voices Movement: Implications for Research and Practice

    Dirk Corstens;Eleanor Longden;Simon McCarthy-Jones;Rachel Waddingham

  • A New Phenomenological Survey of Auditory Hallucinations: Evidence for Subtypes and Implications for Theory and Practice

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;Thomas Trauer;Thomas Trauer;Thomas Trauer;Andrew James Mackinnon;Eliza Sims

  • Psychological Therapies for Auditory Hallucinations (Voices): Current Status and Key Directions for Future Research

    Neil Thomas;Mark Hayward;Mark Hayward;Emmanuelle Peters;Emmanuelle Peters;Mark van der Gaag

  • Understanding How Virtual Reality Can Support Mindfulness Practice: Mixed Methods Study

    Elizabeth Seabrook;Ryan Kelly;Fiona Foley;Stephen Theiler

  • Mindfulness- And Acceptance-Based Interventions for Psychosis: Our Current Understanding and a Meta-Analysis

    Stephanie Louise;Molly Fitzpatrick;Clara Strauss;Clara Strauss;Susan L. Rossell

  • What are the effects of group cognitive behaviour therapy for voices? A randomised control trial

    Til Wykes;Peter Hayward;Neil Thomas;Nicola Green

  • Left prefrontal high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms: a sham-controlled, randomized multicenter trial.

    Thomas Wobrock;Birgit Guse;Joachim Cordes;Wolfgang Wölwer

  • Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention in the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review

    Imogen H. Bell;Michelle H. Lim;Susan L. Rossell;Neil Thomas

  • A randomised controlled trial of acceptance-based cognitive behavioural therapy for command hallucinations in psychotic disorders.

    Frances Shawyer;John Farhall;Andrew J Mackinnon;Tom Trauer;Tom Trauer;Tom Trauer

  • Disturbed gyrification of the prefrontal region in male schizophrenic patients: A morphometric postmortem study.

    Kai Vogeley;Thomas Schneider-Axmann;Ute Pfeiffer;Ralf Tepest

  • Entorhinal cortex pre-alpha cell clusters in schizophrenia: quantitative evidence of a developmental abnormality.

    Peter Falkai;Thomas Schneider-Axmann;William G Honer

  • Right Frontal Hypergyria Differentiation in Affected and Unaffected Siblings From Families Multiply Affected With Schizophrenia: A Morphometric MRI Study

    Kai Vogeley;Ralf Tepest;Ute Pfeiffer;Thomas Schneider-Axmann

  • Relating Therapy for distressing auditory hallucinations: A pilot randomized controlled trial

    Mark Hayward;Anna-Marie Jones;Leanne Bogen-Johnston;Neil Thomas

  • Better Than Mermaids and Stray Dogs? Subtyping Auditory Verbal Hallucinations and Its Implications for Research and Practice

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;Neil Thomas;Clara Strauss;Guy Dodgson

  • Cognitive impairment of executive function as a core symptom of schizophrenia.

    Thomas Wobrock;Ullrich K. H. Ecker;Harald Scherk;Thomas Schneider-Axmann

  • Do trauma-focussed psychological interventions have an effect on psychotic symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Rachel M. Brand;Rachel M. Brand;Carla McEnery;Susan Rossell;Sarah Bendall

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis: randomised controlled trial.

    Frances Shawyer;John Farhall;John Farhall;Neil Thomas;Neil Thomas;Steven C. Hayes

  • Investigating the Lived Experience of Recovery in People Who Hear Voices

    Adèle de Jager;Paul Rhodes;Vanessa Beavan;Douglas Holmes

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in Bipolar Disorder (BD) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): A systematic review

    Wei Lin Toh;Wei Lin Toh;Neil Thomas;Neil Thomas;Susan L. Rossell

  • Online mindfulness-based intervention for late-stage bipolar disorder: pilot evidence for feasibility and effectiveness

    G. Murray;N.D. Leitan;M. Berk;N. Thomas

  • Speech disturbances and quality of life in schizophrenia: Differential impacts on functioning and life satisfaction

    Eric J Tan;Neil Arthur Thomas;Neil Arthur Thomas;Susan Lee Rossell;Susan Lee Rossell

  • What role can avatars play in e-mental health interventions? Exploring new models of client-therapist interaction

    Imogen C. Rehm;Emily Foenander;Klaire Wallace;Jo-Anne M. Abbott

  • Hallucinations Beyond Voices: A Conceptual Review of the Phenomenology of Altered Perception in Psychosis.

    Elizabeth Pienkos;Anne Giersch;Marie Hansen;Clara Humpston

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan L. Rossell
Susan L. Rossell Swinburne University of Technology
John Farhall
John Farhall La Trobe University
Mark Hayward
Mark Hayward University of Sussex
David J. Castle
David J. Castle University of Tasmania
Clara Strauss
Clara Strauss University of Sussex
Michael Kyrios
Michael Kyrios Flinders University
Greg Murray
Greg Murray Swinburne University of Technology
Simon McCarthy-Jones
Simon McCarthy-Jones Trinity College Dublin
Frank Larøi
Frank Larøi University of Oslo
Denny Meyer
Denny Meyer Swinburne University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career opportunities, particularly in the growing field of counseling. Many students begin their journey by researching Greensboro substance abuse counselors education requirements to better understand the academic steps needed. The path often includes both undergraduate and graduate programs, as well as hands-on internships.

Certification standards and job outlooks can vary. For instance, those interested in this profession often seek guidance on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Henderson to learn about state-specific licensing procedures and necessary clinical hours.

Some cities, such as Honolulu, have unique educational criteria. Researching Honolulu substance abuse counselors education requirements helps students align their degrees with local mandates. Meanwhile, in Houston, students planning to enter this field must be familiar with Houston substance abuse counselor certification requirements to ensure a smooth transition into the workforce.

Online psychology degrees provide valuable flexibility, making it possible to meet diverse certification guidelines across locations. Research your destination’s credentialing and education pathways carefully to maximize your career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Thomas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles