World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Simon McCarthy-Jones

Simon McCarthy-Jones

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7583 7072 17 16 104 6848

Simon McCarthy-Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Simon McCarthy-Jones between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Simon McCarthy-Jones published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2012. 6 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2012. 2011: 6 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication
2011 2025

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Simon McCarthy-Jones: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 6
2012 27
2013 8
2014 17
2015 9
2016 7
2017 6
2018 10
2019 11
2020 4
2021 4
2022 4
2023 3
2024 5
2025 1
Total 122
Download as CSV

Simon McCarthy-Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon McCarthy-Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 104
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Simon McCarthy-Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon McCarthy-Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Simon McCarthy-Jones is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and focuses their research in the field of Neuroscience. Their work encompasses several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, and Health.

The primary research topics covered by McCarthy-Jones include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Their work has been published in a range of journals, with frequent publications occurring in:

  • Psychiatry Research
  • NeuroRegulation
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • The International Journal of Human Rights
  • Sexual Abuse

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by McCarthy-Jones include:

  • "A Review of Multimodal Hallucinations: Categorization, Assessment, Theoretical Perspectives, and Clinical Recommendations" (2020), published in Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • "The right to freedom of thought: an interdisciplinary analysis of the UN special rapporteur's report on freedom of thought" (2023), published in The International Journal of Human Rights
  • "The role of inner speech on the association between childhood adversity and 'hearing voices'" (2020), published in Psychiatry Research
  • "Perspectives, Treatment Goals, and Approaches of Prevention-Specialist Mental Health Professionals in Working With Clients Attracted to Children" (2024), published in Sexual Abuse
  • "A Feasibility Study of LORETA Z-Score Neurofeedback Training in Adults with Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorder Experiencing Treatment-Resistant Auditory Verbal Hallucinations" (2022), published in NeuroRegulation

McCarthy-Jones collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Joel Walmsley
  • Azadeh Nematy
  • Susan Flynn
  • Michael P. Keane
  • Marcella Montagnese

Best Publications

  • Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals : results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group

    S. Kelly;S. Kelly;N. Jahanshad;A. Zalesky;P. Kochunov

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care

    Louise C. Johns;Kristiina Kompus;Melissa Connell;Clara Humpston

  • Emerging Perspectives From the Hearing Voices Movement: Implications for Research and Practice

    Dirk Corstens;Eleanor Longden;Simon McCarthy-Jones;Rachel Waddingham

  • The Characteristic Features of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Groups: State-of-the-Art Overview and Future Directions

    Frank Laroi;Iris E. Sommer;Jan Dirk Blom;Charles Fernyhough

  • A New Phenomenological Survey of Auditory Hallucinations: Evidence for Subtypes and Implications for Theory and Practice

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;Thomas Trauer;Thomas Trauer;Thomas Trauer;Andrew James Mackinnon;Eliza Sims

  • Psychological Therapies for Auditory Hallucinations (Voices): Current Status and Key Directions for Future Research

    Neil Thomas;Mark Hayward;Mark Hayward;Emmanuelle Peters;Emmanuelle Peters;Mark van der Gaag

  • Hearing Voices: The Histories, Causes and Meanings of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations

    Simon McCarthy-Jones

  • The varieties of inner speech: links between quality of inner speech and psychopathological variables in a sample of young adults

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;Charles Fernyhough

  • Hearing voices in the resting brain: A review of intrinsic functional connectivity research on auditory verbal hallucinations

    Ben Alderson-Day;Simon McCarthy-Jones;Charles Fernyhough

  • Studying Hallucinations Within the NIMH RDoC Framework

    Judith M. Ford;Judith M. Ford;Sarah E. Morris;Ralph E. Hoffman;Iris Sommer

  • Occurrence and co-occurrence of hallucinations by modality in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;David Smailes;Aiden Corvin;Michael Gill

  • Auditory Hallucinations and the Brain's Resting-State Networks : Findings and Methodological Observations

    Ben Alderson-Day;Kelly Diederen;Charles Fernyhough;Judith M. Ford

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress disorder: common phenomenology, common cause, common interventions?

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;Eleanor Longden

  • Better Than Mermaids and Stray Dogs? Subtyping Auditory Verbal Hallucinations and Its Implications for Research and Practice

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;Neil Thomas;Clara Strauss;Guy Dodgson

  • What is psychosis? A meta-synthesis of inductive qualitative studies exploring the experience of psychosis

    Simon McCarthy-Jones;Michael Marriott;Rebecca Knowles;Georgina Rowse

  • Grandiose delusions: a review and theoretical integration of cognitive and affective perspectives.

    Rebecca Knowles;Simon McCarthy-Jones;Georgina Rowse

  • Paracingulate sulcus morphology is associated with hallucinations in the human brain

    Jane R Garrison;Charles Fernyhough;Simon McCarthy-Jones;Simon McCarthy-Jones;Mark Haggard

  • The brain’s conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech

    Ben Alderson-Day;Susanne Weis;Simon McCarthy-Jones;Peter Moseley

  • Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Phenomenology of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations

    Angela Woods;Nev Jones;Marco Bernini;Felicity Callard

  • Investigating the Lived Experience of Recovery in People Who Hear Voices

    Adèle de Jager;Paul Rhodes;Vanessa Beavan;Douglas Holmes

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Fernyhough
Charles Fernyhough Durham University
Neil Thomas
Neil Thomas Swinburne University of Technology
Frank Larøi
Frank Larøi University of Oslo
Mark Hayward
Mark Hayward University of Sussex
Iris E. C. Sommer
Iris E. C. Sommer University Medical Center Groningen
Clara Strauss
Clara Strauss University of Sussex
Flavie Waters
Flavie Waters University of Western Australia
Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University
Andrea Raballo
Andrea Raballo University of Perugia
Nev Jones
Nev Jones University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up diverse and rewarding career options. Many students pursue advanced online degrees, such as a Master’s in Psychology or Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), which can lead to specialist roles like Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

Becoming a BCBA is a popular pathway known for its impact in schools, clinics, and community settings. The requirements and steps vary by location. For example, if you’re interested in becoming a bcba in Portland, you’ll need to fulfill state-specific coursework, supervised experience hours, and pass the BCBA exam.

Other cities have unique certification requirements. You can learn more about bcba certification requirements in Raleigh, or review guidance on how to become a bcba in Reno and Richmond bcba requirements.

With flexible online programs available, pursuing these professional credentials is more accessible than ever—helping you launch or advance a meaningful career in behavior analysis or psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Simon McCarthy-Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles