World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
11952
World Ranking
4220
National Ranking
450

Emmanuelle Peters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Peters sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Emmanuelle Peters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Peters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emmanuelle Peters is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health. Their work spans subfields including cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and philosophy.

The main topics in Emmanuelle Peters' research include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

They have published several papers focused on different aspects of mental health, psychosis, and brain connectivity. Recent papers include:

  • "Networks underpinning emotion: A systematic review and synthesis of functional and effective connectivity," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Social isolation and psychosis: an investigation of social interactions and paranoia in daily life," 2021, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • "Optimising AVATAR therapy for people who hear distressing voices: study protocol for the AVATAR2 multi-centre randomised controlled trial," 2021, Trials
  • "The digital divide: factors impacting on uptake of remote therapy in a South London psychological therapy service for people with psychosis," 2021, Journal of Mental Health
  • "Mindfulness-based crisis interventions (MBCI) for psychosis within acute inpatient psychiatric settings; a feasibility randomised controlled trial," 2020, BMC Psychiatry

Emmanuelle Peters has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, showing ongoing partnerships in their field. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Philippa Garety
  • Raphael Underwood
  • Amy Hardy
  • Kathryn Greenwood
  • Charles Heriot-Maitland

Their research has been published in several notable venues multiple times, including:

  • Trials
  • Psychological Medicine
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice

Best Publications

  • Measurement of Delusional Ideation in the Normal Population: Introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory)

    Emmanuelle R. Peters;Stephen A. Joseph;Philippa A. Garety

  • Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ)

    Paul Chadwick;Paul Chadwick;Martin Hember;Janette Symes;Emmanuelle Peters

  • Measuring Delusional Ideation: The 21-Item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI)

    Emmanuelle Peters;Stephen Joseph;Samantha Day;Philippa Garety

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care

    Louise C. Johns;Kristiina Kompus;Melissa Connell;Clara Humpston

  • Delusional ideation in religious and psychotic populations

    Emmanuelle Peters;Samantha Day;Jacqueline Mckenna;Gilli Orbach

  • Need for closure and jumping-to-conclusions in delusion-prone individuals.

    Susannah M. A. Y. Colbert;Emmanuelle R. Peters

  • Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis.

    M R Broome;L C Johns;I Valli;J B Woolley

  • Psychological Therapies for Auditory Hallucinations (Voices): Current Status and Key Directions for Future Research

    Neil Thomas;Mark Hayward;Mark Hayward;Emmanuelle Peters;Emmanuelle Peters;Mark van der Gaag

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations and continuum models of psychosis: A systematic review of the healthy voice-hearer literature

    David Baumeister;Ottilie Sedgwick;Oliver Howes;Emmanuelle Peters

  • Cognitive functioning in delusions: a longitudinal analysis.

    Emmanuelle Peters;Philippa Garety

  • A quantitative genetic analysis of schizotypal personality traits.

    Y. M. Linney;R. M. Murray;E. R. Peters;A. M. MacDONALD

  • Cognitive behaviour therapy to prevent harmful compliance with command hallucinations (COMMAND): a randomised controlled trial.

    Max Birchwood;Maria Michail;Alan Meaden;Nicholas Tarrier

  • Disease, deficit or denial? Models of poor insight in psychosis

    M. A. Cooke;E. R. Peters;E. Kuipers;V. Kumari

  • Insight, distress and coping styles in schizophrenia

    Michael Cooke;Emmanuelle Peters;Dominic Fannon;Anantha P.P. Anilkumar

  • Clinical, socio‐demographic and psychological characteristics in individuals with persistent psychotic experiences with and without a “need for care”

    Emmanuelle Roisin Peters;Emmanuelle Roisin Peters;Thomas Ward;Mike Jackson;Mike Jackson;Craig Morgan

  • The incidence of schizotypy among cannabis and alcohol users.

    Julia A. Nunn;Fiona Rizza;Emmanuelle R. Peters

  • CHoice of Outcome In Cbt for psychosEs (CHOICE): The Development of a New Service User–Led Outcome Measure of CBT for Psychosis

    Kathryn E. Greenwood;Angela Sweeney;Sally Williams;Philippa Garety

  • Appraisals of Anomalous Experiences Interview (AANEX): a multidimensional measure of psychological responses to anomalies associated with psychosis

    C M C Brett;Emmanuelle Peters;L C Johns;P Tabraham

  • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity predicts responsiveness to cognitive-behavioral therapy in schizophrenia

    Veena Kumari;Veena Kumari;Emmanuelle R. Peters;Emmanuelle R. Peters;Dominic Fannon;Elena Antonova

  • Reasoning biases in delusion-prone individuals

    Yvonne M. Linney;Emmanuelle R. Peters;Peter Ayton

  • The measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population—-introducing the PDI (PEters et al. delusions inventory)

    E.R. Peters;S.A. Joseph;P.A. Garety

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippa Garety
Philippa Garety King's College London
Elizabeth Kuipers
Elizabeth Kuipers King's College London
Veena Kumari
Veena Kumari Brunel University London
Louise Johns
Louise Johns University of Oxford
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Paul Chadwick
Paul Chadwick University of Bath
Shitij Kapur
Shitij Kapur King's College London
Til Wykes
Til Wykes King's College London
Juliana Onwumere
Juliana Onwumere King's College London
Jan Scott
Jan Scott Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online education and career options, especially for those wishing to become counselors or school-based professionals. Many universities now offer accelerated programs designed for busy adults or those looking to transition quickly into the field.

For example, Wyoming accelerated counseling programs provide streamlined pathways for students to enter the counseling profession more efficiently. If you’re interested in working within educational settings, it’s important to understand state-specific requirements.

Becoming a school counselor may have different prerequisites depending on where you live. For instance, Alabama school counselor certification requirements cover specific certification steps and experience, while Alaska school counselor education requirements focus on educational qualifications unique to the state.

Anyone considering this career path should also look at requirements for other states, such as the process for becoming a school counselor in Arizona. Researching each state’s pathways helps ensure you select the right online program and earn the credentials needed for your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuelle Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles