World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4220 3899 450 426 190 11952

Emmanuelle Peters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emmanuelle Peters between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emmanuelle Peters published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2014. 15 of the 218 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2014. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications
1994 2025

218 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emmanuelle Peters: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 4
1999 5
2000 5
2001 3
2002 2
2003 7
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 7
2008 9
2009 5
2010 12
2011 5
2012 13
2013 7
2014 23
2015 9
2016 13
2017 11
2018 11
2019 7
2020 6
2021 11
2022 3
2023 10
2024 10
2025 5
Total 218
Download as CSV

Emmanuelle Peters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 190
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Emmanuelle Peters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Emmanuelle Peters is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health. Their work spans subfields including cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and philosophy.

The main topics in Emmanuelle Peters' research include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

They have published several papers focused on different aspects of mental health, psychosis, and brain connectivity. Recent papers include:

  • "Networks underpinning emotion: A systematic review and synthesis of functional and effective connectivity," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Social isolation and psychosis: an investigation of social interactions and paranoia in daily life," 2021, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • "Optimising AVATAR therapy for people who hear distressing voices: study protocol for the AVATAR2 multi-centre randomised controlled trial," 2021, Trials
  • "The digital divide: factors impacting on uptake of remote therapy in a South London psychological therapy service for people with psychosis," 2021, Journal of Mental Health
  • "Mindfulness-based crisis interventions (MBCI) for psychosis within acute inpatient psychiatric settings; a feasibility randomised controlled trial," 2020, BMC Psychiatry

Emmanuelle Peters has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, showing ongoing partnerships in their field. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Philippa Garety
  • Raphael Underwood
  • Amy Hardy
  • Kathryn Greenwood
  • Charles Heriot-Maitland

Their research has been published in several notable venues multiple times, including:

  • Trials
  • Psychological Medicine
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice

Best Publications

  • Measurement of Delusional Ideation in the Normal Population: Introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory)

    Emmanuelle R. Peters;Stephen A. Joseph;Philippa A. Garety

  • Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ)

    Paul Chadwick;Paul Chadwick;Martin Hember;Janette Symes;Emmanuelle Peters

  • Measuring Delusional Ideation: The 21-Item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI)

    Emmanuelle Peters;Stephen Joseph;Samantha Day;Philippa Garety

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care

    Louise C. Johns;Kristiina Kompus;Melissa Connell;Clara Humpston

  • Delusional ideation in religious and psychotic populations

    Emmanuelle Peters;Samantha Day;Jacqueline Mckenna;Gilli Orbach

  • Need for closure and jumping-to-conclusions in delusion-prone individuals.

    Susannah M. A. Y. Colbert;Emmanuelle R. Peters

  • Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis.

    M R Broome;L C Johns;I Valli;J B Woolley

  • Psychological Therapies for Auditory Hallucinations (Voices): Current Status and Key Directions for Future Research

    Neil Thomas;Mark Hayward;Mark Hayward;Emmanuelle Peters;Emmanuelle Peters;Mark van der Gaag

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations and continuum models of psychosis: A systematic review of the healthy voice-hearer literature

    David Baumeister;Ottilie Sedgwick;Oliver Howes;Emmanuelle Peters

  • Cognitive functioning in delusions: a longitudinal analysis.

    Emmanuelle Peters;Philippa Garety

  • A quantitative genetic analysis of schizotypal personality traits.

    Y. M. Linney;R. M. Murray;E. R. Peters;A. M. MacDONALD

  • Cognitive behaviour therapy to prevent harmful compliance with command hallucinations (COMMAND): a randomised controlled trial.

    Max Birchwood;Maria Michail;Alan Meaden;Nicholas Tarrier

  • Disease, deficit or denial? Models of poor insight in psychosis

    M. A. Cooke;E. R. Peters;E. Kuipers;V. Kumari

  • Insight, distress and coping styles in schizophrenia

    Michael Cooke;Emmanuelle Peters;Dominic Fannon;Anantha P.P. Anilkumar

  • Clinical, socio‐demographic and psychological characteristics in individuals with persistent psychotic experiences with and without a “need for care”

    Emmanuelle Roisin Peters;Emmanuelle Roisin Peters;Thomas Ward;Mike Jackson;Mike Jackson;Craig Morgan

  • The incidence of schizotypy among cannabis and alcohol users.

    Julia A. Nunn;Fiona Rizza;Emmanuelle R. Peters

  • CHoice of Outcome In Cbt for psychosEs (CHOICE): The Development of a New Service User–Led Outcome Measure of CBT for Psychosis

    Kathryn E. Greenwood;Angela Sweeney;Sally Williams;Philippa Garety

  • Appraisals of Anomalous Experiences Interview (AANEX): a multidimensional measure of psychological responses to anomalies associated with psychosis

    C M C Brett;Emmanuelle Peters;L C Johns;P Tabraham

  • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity predicts responsiveness to cognitive-behavioral therapy in schizophrenia

    Veena Kumari;Veena Kumari;Emmanuelle R. Peters;Emmanuelle R. Peters;Dominic Fannon;Elena Antonova

  • Reasoning biases in delusion-prone individuals

    Yvonne M. Linney;Emmanuelle R. Peters;Peter Ayton

  • The measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population—-introducing the PDI (PEters et al. delusions inventory)

    E.R. Peters;S.A. Joseph;P.A. Garety

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippa Garety
Philippa Garety King's College London
Elizabeth Kuipers
Elizabeth Kuipers King's College London
Veena Kumari
Veena Kumari Brunel University London
Louise Johns
Louise Johns University of Oxford
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Paul Chadwick
Paul Chadwick University of Bath
Shitij Kapur
Shitij Kapur King's College London
Til Wykes
Til Wykes King's College London
Juliana Onwumere
Juliana Onwumere King's College London
Jan Scott
Jan Scott Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online education and career options, especially for those wishing to become counselors or school-based professionals. Many universities now offer accelerated programs designed for busy adults or those looking to transition quickly into the field.

For example, Wyoming accelerated counseling programs provide streamlined pathways for students to enter the counseling profession more efficiently. If you’re interested in working within educational settings, it’s important to understand state-specific requirements.

Becoming a school counselor may have different prerequisites depending on where you live. For instance, Alabama school counselor certification requirements cover specific certification steps and experience, while Alaska school counselor education requirements focus on educational qualifications unique to the state.

Anyone considering this career path should also look at requirements for other states, such as the process for becoming a school counselor in Arizona. Researching each state’s pathways helps ensure you select the right online program and earn the credentials needed for your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuelle Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles