World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
10699
World Ranking
7433
National Ranking
736

Paul Chadwick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Chadwick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul Chadwick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Chadwick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Chadwick is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and medicine, focusing particularly on clinical psychology and psychiatry and mental health. Their research spans 45 publications in psychology and 20 in medicine, with subfields including clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's main areas of study concentrate on mindfulness and compassion interventions, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, schizophrenia research and treatment, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Additionally, their research addresses mental health treatment and access, digital mental health interventions, and eating disorders and behaviors.

Paul Chadwick's recent papers include:

  • Mindfulness-based crisis interventions (MBCI) for psychosis within acute inpatient psychiatric settings; a feasibility randomised controlled trial (2020, BMC Psychiatry)
  • Self-caught methodologies for measuring mind wandering with meta-awareness: A systematic review (2023, Consciousness and Cognition)
  • Validation of the German Version of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ) (2020, Mindfulness)
  • Group mindfulness-based therapy for persecutory delusions: A pilot randomised controlled trial (2020, Schizophrenia Research)
  • Recommendations for monitoring and reporting harm in mindfulness for psychosis research (2021, The British Journal of Psychiatry)

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include:

  • Lyn Ellett
  • Kerem Böge
  • Emmanuelle Peters
  • Inge Hahne
  • Niklas Bergmann

The venues where Paul Chadwick regularly publishes reflect their research focus and include:

  • Mindfulness
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Best Publications

  • The omnipotence of voices. A cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations.

    Paul Chadwick;Max Birchwood

  • Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ)

    Paul Chadwick;Paul Chadwick;Martin Hember;Janette Symes;Emmanuelle Peters

  • Cognitive Therapy for Delusions, Voices and Paranoia

    Paul D. Chadwick;Max J. Birchwood;Peter Trower

  • The omnipotence of voices: testing the validity of a cognitive model.

    Max Birchwood;Paul Chadwick

  • The revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R).

    Paul Chadwick;Susan Lees;Max Birchwood

  • Cognitive approach to depression and suicidal thinking in psychosis. 1. Ontogeny of post-psychotic depression.

    Max Birchwood;Zaffer Iqbal;Paul Chadwick;Peter Trower

  • Mindfulness Groups for People with Psychosis

    Paul Chadwick;Katherine Newman Taylor;Nicola Abba

  • A pilot randomized control trial investigating the effect of mindfulness practice on pain tolerance, psychological well-being, and physiological activity ☆

    Jessica Kingston;Paul Chadwick;Paul Chadwick;Daniel Meron;T. Chas Skinner

  • Cognitive approach to depression and suicidal thinking in psychosis. 2. Testing the validity of a social ranking model.

    Zaffer Iqbal;Max Birchwood;Paul Chadwick;Peter Trower

  • Mindfulness groups for distressing voices and paranoia: a replication and randomized feasibility trial.

    Paul Chadwick;Stephanie Hughes;Daphne Russell;Ian Russell

  • Measurement and modification of delusional beliefs.

    P. D. J. Chadwick;C. F. Lowe

  • The omnipotence of voices. II: The Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ).

    Paul Chadwick;Max Birchwood

  • Person-Based Cognitive Therapy for Distressing Psychosis

    Paul Chadwick

  • Pathways to Defense of the Self: A Theory of Two Types of Paranoia

    Peter Trower;Paul Chadwick

  • Responding mindfully to distressing psychosis: A grounded theory analysis

    Nicola Abba;Paul Chadwick;Chris Stevenson

  • The reliability and quality of cognitive case formulation

    Willem Kuyken;Claire D. Fothergill;Meyrem Musa;Paul Chadwick

  • A cognitive approach to measuring and modifying delusions.

    Paul D. J. Chadwick;C. F. Lowe

  • PARANOIA IN A NONCLINICAL POPULATION OF COLLEGE STUDENTS

    Lyn Ellett;Barbara Lopes;Paul Chadwick

  • Impact of case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis

    Paul Chadwick;Clare Williams;Joanna Mackenzie

  • Clinical, socio‐demographic and psychological characteristics in individuals with persistent psychotic experiences with and without a “need for care”

    Emmanuelle Roisin Peters;Emmanuelle Roisin Peters;Thomas Ward;Mike Jackson;Mike Jackson;Craig Morgan

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Trower
Peter Trower University of Birmingham
Emmanuelle Peters
Emmanuelle Peters King's College London
Max Birchwood
Max Birchwood University of Warwick
Mark Hayward
Mark Hayward University of Sussex
Philippa Garety
Philippa Garety King's College London
Clara Strauss
Clara Strauss University of Sussex
Dave Dagnan
Dave Dagnan University of Cumbria
David Kingdon
David Kingdon University of Southampton
Oliver D. Howes
Oliver D. Howes King's College London
Craig Morgan
Craig Morgan King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a range of rewarding online degree options and specialized career paths. One rapidly expanding field is substance abuse counseling, which plays an essential role in supporting mental health and recovery in communities nationwide.

Degree requirements and certification processes vary by state and city. For example, Dallas substance abuse counselor certification requirements are tailored to meet local needs and regulations, while becoming a substance abuse counselor in Denver may involve different educational credentials and training hours.

Prospective counselors must often choose the right online degree program to meet licensure requirements. For those considering work in Michigan, learning about Detroit substance abuse counselors education requirements can be a helpful guide. Similarly, those interested in opportunities in North Carolina can find specific information about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Durham.

Understanding these pathways—along with local requirements—can help you make informed decisions about your education and future career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Chadwick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles