World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 98 677 591 85 77 352 39609

Philippa Garety publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philippa Garety between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philippa Garety published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2014. 23 of the 381 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2014. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1984 2025

381 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philippa Garety: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 3
1986 1
1987 3
1988 4
1989 0
1990 3
1991 4
1992 2
1993 4
1994 3
1995 3
1996 3
1997 4
1998 3
1999 5
2000 5
2001 7
2002 8
2003 6
2004 15
2005 11
2006 23
2007 14
2008 25
2009 9
2010 10
2011 9
2012 17
2013 18
2014 32
2015 19
2016 11
2017 13
2018 15
2019 12
2020 8
2021 17
2022 5
2023 3
2024 11
2025 12
Total 381
Download as CSV

Philippa Garety publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippa Garety sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 352 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 352
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philippa Garety D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippa Garety sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53 98
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Philippa Garety is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a strong focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health as well as Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. The scientist's work also covers subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy.

Their main research topics include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Philippa Garety has contributed publications to several notable academic venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • Trials
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Frequent collaborators in their work include Thomas Ward, Mar Rus-Calafell, Amy Hardy, Richard Emsley, and Clementine Edwards.

Selected recent papers authored by Philippa Garety demonstrate an emphasis on psychological therapies and digital interventions targeting psychosis and distressing voices:

  • "Effects of SlowMo, a Blended Digital Therapy Targeting Reasoning, on Paranoia Among People With Psychosis," 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Optimising AVATAR therapy for people who hear distressing voices: study protocol for the AVATAR2 multi-centre randomised controlled trial," 2021, Trials
  • "Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial," 2024, Nature Medicine

Additional relevant papers linked with related themes include:

  • "AVATAR Therapy for Distressing Voices: A Comprehensive Account of Therapeutic Targets," 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • "The Role of Sense of Voice Presence and Anxiety Reduction in AVATAR Therapy," 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Best Publications

  • A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis.

    PA Garety;E Kuipers;DG Fowler;D Freeman

  • Psychological treatments in schizophrenia: I. Meta-analysis of family intervention and cognitive behaviour therapy

    S Pilling;P Bebbington;Elizabeth Kuipers;Philippa Garety

  • Cognitive approaches to delusions: a critical review of theories and evidence.

    Philippa A. Garety;Daniel Freeman

  • A cognitive model of persecutory delusions

    Daniel Freeman;Philippa A. Garety;Elizabeth Kuipers;David Fowler

  • Measurement of Delusional Ideation in the Normal Population: Introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory)

    Emmanuelle R. Peters;Stephen A. Joseph;Philippa A. Garety

  • Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population.

    Daniel Freeman;Philippa A. Garety;Paul E. Bebbington;Benjamin Smith

  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychosis: Theory and Practice

    D. Robert Fowler;Philippa A. Garety;Liz Kuipers

  • Reasoning in Deluded Schizophrenic and Paranoid Patients: Biases in Performance on a Probabilistic Inference Task

    P A Garety;D R Hemsley;S Wessely

  • Measuring Delusional Ideation: The 21-Item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI)

    Emmanuelle Peters;Stephen Joseph;Samantha Day;Philippa Garety

  • Probabilistic judgements in deluded and non-deluded subjects

    S F Huq;Philippa Garety;D R Hemsley

  • Mind the gap: Improving the dissemination of CBT

    R. Shafran;D.M. Clark;C.G. Fairburn;A. Arntz

  • The Lambeth Early Onset (LEO) Team: randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of specialised care for early psychosis

    Tom K J Craig;Philippa Garety;Paddy Power;Nikola Rahaman

  • Connecting neurosis and psychosis: the direct influence of emotion on delusions and hallucinations.

    Daniel Freeman;Philippa A. Garety;Philippa A. Garety

  • The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS): psychometric properties and associations with paranoia and grandiosity in non-clinical and psychosis samples

    David Fowler;Daniel Freeman;Ben Smith;Elizabeth Kuipers

  • London-East Anglia randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis. I: effects of the treatment phase.

    Elizabeth Kuipers;Philippa Garety;David Fowler;Graham Dunn

  • Reasoning, emotions, and delusional conviction in psychosis.

    Philippa A. Garety;Daniel Freeman;Suzanne Jolley;Graham Dunn

  • Psychological treatments in schizophrenia: II. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of social skills training and cognitive remediation.

    S Pilling;P Bebbington;E Kuipers;P Garety

  • Emotion and psychosis: Links between depression, self-esteem, negative schematic beliefs and delusions and hallucinations

    Ben Smith;David G. Fowler;Daniel Freeman;Paul Bebbington

  • Measuring ideas of persecution and social reference: the Green et al. Paranoid Thought Scales (GPTS)

    Cel Green;D Freeman;E Kuipers;PE Bebbington

  • The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia

    Philippa Garety

  • The measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population—-introducing the PDI (PEters et al. delusions inventory)

    E.R. Peters;S.A. Joseph;P.A. Garety

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Freeman
Daniel Freeman University of Oxford
Elizabeth Kuipers
Elizabeth Kuipers King's College London
David Fowler
David Fowler University of Sussex
Graham Dunn
Graham Dunn University of Manchester
Paul Bebbington
Paul Bebbington University College London
Emmanuelle Peters
Emmanuelle Peters King's College London
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Lucia Valmaggia
Lucia Valmaggia King's College London
Tom K. J. Craig
Tom K. J. Craig King's College London
Juliana Onwumere
Juliana Onwumere King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and dynamic career pathways. A popular option is pursuing a degree in social work, which combines psychological theory with real-world skills to support individuals and communities.

Students can choose from the top social work programs in the Northeast for a comprehensive curriculum and diverse fieldwork opportunities. Those seeking specialized training in other regions might consider the best social work degree programs in Oklahoma or the best social work programs in Philadelphia, each offering unique perspectives and local expertise.

Moreover, cities like Portland are known for their inclusive approach and diverse career options. The best social work programs in Portland highlight the importance of accessible online education tailored to modern career demands.

Whether your goal is to become a licensed social worker, counselor, or community advocate, combining psychology studies with an accredited online degree can lead to rewarding, impactful roles across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Philippa Garety

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles