| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 34 | 9340 | 8619 | 3945 | 3568 | 142 | 4634 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Terry G. Beltz between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Terry G. Beltz published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2006. 2 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.
143 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 1 |
| 1994 | 2 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 4 |
| 1999 | 8 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 2 |
| 2006 | 10 |
| 2007 | 5 |
| 2008 | 7 |
| 2009 | 7 |
| 2010 | 5 |
| 2011 | 7 |
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 7 |
| 2014 | 7 |
| 2015 | 9 |
| 2016 | 3 |
| 2017 | 3 |
| 2018 | 4 |
| 2019 | 3 |
| 2020 | 6 |
| 2021 | 6 |
| 2022 | 5 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| Total | 143 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry G. Beltz sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile
39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | 142 |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry G. Beltz sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile
4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | 34 |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
Angela J. Grippo;Joseph Francis;Terry G. Beltz;Robert B. Felder
Angela J. Grippo;Terry G. Beltz;Alan Kim Johnson
Robin L. Davisson;Gongyu Yang;Terry G. Beltz;Martin D. Cassell
Angela J. Grippo;Terry G. Beltz;Robert M. Weiss;Alan Kim Johnson
Yu-Ming Kang;Zhi-Hua Zhang;Ralph F. Johnson;Yang Yu
Joseph Francis;Robert M. Weiss;Shun Guang Wei;Alan Kim Johnson
Justin L. Grobe;Connie L. Grobe;Terry G. Beltz;Scott G. Westphal
Andrea M. Zardetto-Smith;Terry G. Beltz;Alan Kim Johnson
Satoshi Morimoto;Martin D. Cassell;Terry G. Beltz;Alan Kim Johnson
Baojian Xue;Terry G. Beltz;Yang Yu;Fang Guo
Angela J. Grippo;Claudia M. Santos;Ralph F. Johnson;Terry G. Beltz
Shun-Guang Wei;Zhi-Hua Zhang;Terry G. Beltz;Yang Yu
Baojian Xue;Yang Yu;Zhongming Zhang;Fang Guo
Laurival A. De Luca;Zhice Xu;Guus H. M. Schoorlemmer;Robert L. Thunhorst
Baojian Xue;Zhongming Zhang;Terry G. Beltz;Fang Guo
Julie L. Lavoie;Xuebo Liu;Robert A. Bianco;Terry G. Beltz
Baojian Xue;Robert L. Thunhorst;Yang Yu;Fang Guo
Jose Vanderlei Menani;Debora S.A Colombari;Terry G Beltz;Robert L Thunhorst
Baojian Xue;Zhongming Zhang;Terry G. Beltz;Ralph F. Johnson
Donald M. Lamkin;Susan K. Lutgendorf;David Lubaroff;Anil K. Sood
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of exciting career options. If you’re considering expanding your skillset or looking for flexible study options, online education can be a strategic choice. Many students wonder what degrees make the most money, and neuroscience is often among the top-paying and most in-demand fields.
For those seeking affordability, exploring online colleges that are budget-friendly and accept FAFSA can help minimize student debt. Whether you’re looking to build a solid foundation or advance in your current field, there are options at every educational level.
If you’re interested in boosting your job prospects quickly, consider pursuing job certifications online. Certifications in data analysis, lab technology, or health informatics can complement a neuroscience background and improve your employability.
Some may be drawn to programs that are recognized as the easy degrees to get online, which can provide a faster route to a credential or can serve as a useful stepping stone to more advanced study in neuroscience or related areas.
Osaka University
Heidelberg University
Tsinghua University
University of Cambridge
Georgetown University
University of Amsterdam
University of California, Berkeley
University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Periyar University
Huntsman Cancer Institute
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Oregon Health & Science University
Harvard University
University of Windsor