World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
4471
World Ranking
8193
National Ranking
3507

Meredith Hay publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meredith Hay sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 134 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Meredith Hay D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meredith Hay sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Meredith Hay is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and focuses on research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their scholarly work covers various subfields including Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research addresses several main topics, such as:

  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Meredith Hay has contributed to a number of publications, including recent papers as follows:

  • Hypertension and Age-Related Cognitive Impairment: Common Risk Factors and a Role for Precision Aging, 2020, Current Hypertension Reports
  • Glycopeptide drugs: A pharmacological dimension between "Small Molecules" and "Biologics", 2020, Peptides
  • Smoking is associated with impaired verbal learning and memory performance in women more than men, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Neurofilament light: a possible prognostic biomarker for treatment of vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia, 2021, Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • Two separate, large cohorts reveal potential modifiers of age-associated variation in visual reaction time performance, 2021, npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Christina Hoyer-Kimura
  • Robin Polt
  • John P. Konhilas
  • Lee Ryan
  • Matthew J. Huentelman

Meredith Hay publishes regularly in venues such as Pharmaceutics, Physiology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer s & Dementia, and the Journal of Neuroinflammation, with multiple contributions in several of these journals.

Best Publications

  • Sex differences in the development of angiotensin II-induced hypertension in conscious mice

    Baojian Xue;Jaya Pamidimukkala;Meredith Hay

  • Estrogen receptor-α mediates estrogen protection from angiotensin II-induced hypertension in conscious female mice

    Baojian Xue;Jaya Pamidimukkala;Dennis B. Lubahn;Meredith Hay

  • Sex differences in angiotensin II- and aldosterone-induced hypertension: the central protective effects of estrogen.

    Baojian Xue;Alan Kim Johnson;Meredith Hay

  • Sex differences in T-lymphocyte tissue infiltration and development of angiotensin II hypertension.

    Dennis P. Pollow;Jennifer Uhrlaub;Melissa J. Romero-Aleshire;Kathryn Sandberg

  • Central interactions of aldosterone and angiotensin II in aldosterone- and angiotensin II-induced hypertension

    Baojian Xue;Terry G. Beltz;Yang Yu;Fang Guo

  • A- and C-type rat nodose sensory neurons: Model interpretations of dynamic discharge characteristics

    J. H. Schild;J. W. Clark;M. Hay;D. Mendelowitz

  • Interactions between vasopressin and baroreflex control of the sympathetic nervous system.

    Eileen M. Hasser;Vernon S. Bishop;Meredith Hay

  • Sex-specific T-cell regulation of angiotensin II-dependent hypertension.

    Hong Ji;Wei Zheng;Xiangjun Li;Jun Liu

  • Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade Attenuates Chronic Overexpression of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Stimulation of Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Oxidase and Cardiac Remodeling

    Sameer Stas;Adam Whaley-Connell;Javad Habibi;Javad Habibi;Lama Appesh;Lama Appesh

  • Expression of metabotropic glutamate receptors in nodose ganglia and the nucleus of the solitary tract

    Caroline J. Hoang;Meredith Hay

  • Estrogen regulation of the brain renin-angiotensin system in protection against angiotensin II-induced sensitization of hypertension

    Baojian Xue;Zhongming Zhang;Terry G. Beltz;Fang Guo

  • Sex differences in angiotensin II- induced hypertension

    B. Xue;A. K. Johnson;Meredith Hay

  • Involvement of the area postrema in the regulation of sympathetic outflow to the cardiovascular system.

    Vernon S. Bishop;Meredith Hay

  • Sex, the brain and hypertension: brain oestrogen receptors and high blood pressure risk factors.

    Meredith Hay

  • Central estrogen inhibition of angiotensin II-induced hypertension in male mice and the role of reactive oxygen species

    Baojian Xue;Yuanzi Zhao;Alan Kim Johnson;Meredith Hay

  • Estrogen Receptor-β in the Paraventricular Nucleus and Rostroventrolateral Medulla Plays an Essential Protective Role in Aldosterone/Salt-Induced Hypertension in Female Rats

    Baojian Xue;Zhongming Zhang;Terry G. Beltz;Ralph F. Johnson

  • Glutamate metabotropic receptor inhibition of voltage-gated calcium currents in visceral sensory neurons

    M. Hay;Diana L Kunze

  • Area postrema and sympathetic nervous system effects of vasopressin and angiotensin II

    Eileen M Hasser;J Thomas Cunningham;Margaret J Sullivan;Kathleen S Curtis

  • Glutamate in the nucleus of the solitary tract activates both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors

    C. Michael Foley;Julia A. Moffitt;Meredith Hay;Eileen M. Hasser

  • Postnatal histogenetic death of rat forelimb motoneurons

    D. S. Rootman;W. G. Tatton;W. G. Tatton;M. Hay

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Kim Johnson
Alan Kim Johnson University of Iowa
Terry G. Beltz
Terry G. Beltz University of Iowa
Lee Ryan
Lee Ryan University of Arizona
Carol A. Barnes
Carol A. Barnes University of Arizona
Asta Håberg
Asta Håberg Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Todd W. Vanderah
Todd W. Vanderah University of Arizona
Elizabeth L. Glisky
Elizabeth L. Glisky University of Arizona
Diana L. Kunze
Diana L. Kunze Case Western Reserve University
Matthew J. Huentelman
Matthew J. Huentelman Translational Genomics Research Institute
Roberta Diaz Brinton
Roberta Diaz Brinton University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to related career paths across psychology, counseling, and therapy. Many students consider complementing their neuroscience background with advanced degrees that blend scientific insight with practical skills for working with clients and patients.

For those interested in helping professions, there is growing demand for counselors and therapists with strong research and analytical backgrounds. Pursuing cacrep-accredited programs is one way to ensure you receive a rigorous education in counseling that meets high professional standards. Similarly, those interested in flexible learning should consider online masters counseling programs, which allow you to balance education with work or other obligations.

Careers in marriage and family therapy are also accessible with affordable online mft programs designed to fit a variety of budgets. Additionally, students looking to deepen their understanding of human behavior may find online psychology masters provide a strong foundation for research, academic, or clinical roles.

Best Scientists Citing Meredith Hay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles