World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth L. Glisky

Elizabeth L. Glisky

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
8254
World Ranking
6696
National Ranking
3631

Elizabeth L. Glisky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth L. Glisky sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth L. Glisky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth L. Glisky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth L. Glisky is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and neuroscience, with significant work in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Other relevant subfields include social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and neuropsychology and physiological psychology.

The research topics covered by Elizabeth L. Glisky reflect a concentration on aging, cognition, and brain function. Key areas of investigation include dementia and cognitive impairment research, aging and gerontology research, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study, neural and behavioral psychology studies, functional brain connectivity studies, and cognitive abilities and testing. The neurobiology of language and bilingualism is also among their studied topics.

Their recent publications demonstrate this thematic focus. Selected papers include:

  • "Smoking is associated with impaired verbal learning and memory performance in women more than men" (2021) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Natural, Everyday Language Use Provides a Window Into the Integrity of Older Adults' Executive Functioning" (2020) published in The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • "Two separate, large cohorts reveal potential modifiers of age-associated variation in visual reaction time performance" (2021) published in npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease
  • "Differences between young and older adults in unity and diversity of executive functions" (2020) published in Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition
  • "Episodic Memory and Executive Function Are Differentially Affected by Retests but Similarly Affected by Age in a Longitudinal Study of Normally-Aging Older Adults" (2022) published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Elizabeth L. Glisky frequently publishes in journals such as Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Innovation in Aging, Scientific Reports, and npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease.

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, including Matthew D Grilli, Angelina J. Polsinelli, Matthias R. Mehl, Suzanne Moseley, and Joshua S. Talboom.

Best Publications

  • Double dissociation between item and source memory.

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Michael R. Polster;Barbara C. Routhieaux

  • Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem?

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Susan R. Rubin;Patrick S. R. Davidson

  • Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in memory-impaired patients: method of vanishing cues.

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Daniel L. Schacter;Endel Tulving

  • Computer learning by memory-impaired patients: Acquisition and retention of complex knowledge.

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Daniel L. Schacter;Endel Tulving

  • Structural brain differences and cognitive functioning related to body mass index in older females

    Katrin Walther;Alex C. Birdsill;Elizabeth L. Glisky;Lee Ryan

  • Prospective memory: a neuropsychological study.

    Mark A. McDaniel;Elizabeth L. Glisky;Melissa J. Guynn;Barbara C. Routhieaux

  • Memory and executive function in older adults: relationships with temporal and prefrontal gray matter volumes and white matter hyperintensities.

    Cyma Van Petten;Elena Plante;Patrick S.R Davidson;Trudy Y Kuo

  • Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging

    Patrick S. R. Davidson;Elizabeth L. Glisky

  • Characterizing cognitive aging of working memory and executive function in animal models.

    Jennifer Lynn Bizon;Thomas C Foster;Gene E Alexander;Elizabeth L. Glisky

  • Do young and older adults rely on different processes in source memory tasks? A neuropsychological study.

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Lauren L. Kong

  • Acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in organic amnesia: Training for computer-related work

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Cognitive Benefits of Online Social Networking for Healthy Older Adults

    Janelle W. Myhre;Matthias R. Mehl;Elizabeth L. Glisky

  • Characterizing cognitive aging in humans with links to animal models.

    Gene E Alexander;Gene E Alexander;Lee Ka Lok Ryan;Lee Ka Lok Ryan;Dawn Bowers;Dawn Bowers;Thomas C. Foster;Thomas C. Foster

  • Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neuropsychological data

    Susan R. Rubin;Cyma Van Petten;Elizabeth L. Glisky;Wendy M. Newberg

  • Frontal lobe involvement in a task of time-based prospective memory

    Craig P. McFarland;Elizabeth L. Glisky

  • When priming persists: long-lasting implicit memory for a single episode in amnesic patients.

    Mary Pat McAndrews;Elizabeth L. Glisky;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Is flashbulb memory a special instance of source memory? Evidence from older adults.

    Patrick S. R. Davidson;Elizabeth L. Glisky

  • Long-term retention of computer learning by patients with memory disorders

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations.

    Elizabeth L. Glisky;Jan C. Rabinowitz

  • Recency discrimination deficits in frontal lobe patients

    Meryl A. Butters;Meryl A. Butters;Alfred W. Kaszniak;Elizabeth L. Glisky;Paul J. Eslinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee Ryan
Lee Ryan University of Arizona
Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Alfred W. Kaszniak
Alfred W. Kaszniak University of Arizona
Carol A. Barnes
Carol A. Barnes University of Arizona
Matthias R. Mehl
Matthias R. Mehl University of Arizona
Gene E. Alexander
Gene E. Alexander University of Arizona
Meredith Hay
Meredith Hay University of Arizona
Asta Håberg
Asta Håberg Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Matthew J. Huentelman
Matthew J. Huentelman Translational Genomics Research Institute
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a wide range of career pathways. Students can pursue specializations such as clinical psychology, counseling, organizational psychology, or research-based roles. Many universities offer high-value programs across the country, making it important to compare options and outcomes.

Location can be a key factor in choosing a program. For those seeking the best value psychology programs in Raleigh, or looking for the most valuable psychology programs in St. Louis, evaluating tuition, job placement rates, and faculty expertise is crucial. Similarly, prospective students may want to review the best value psychology programs in South Carolina and the most valuable psychology degrees in Tampa for more regional options.

Earning your psychology degree online can provide flexibility, but it’s important to ensure a program is reputable and accredited. Consider your career ambitions—roles in therapy, school counseling, human resources, or research may require different licensure or further study. Careful research can help you choose the most strategic and rewarding educational path.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth L. Glisky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles