World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4403
World Ranking
10268
National Ranking
5391

Emily C. Edmonds publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily C. Edmonds sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Emily C. Edmonds D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily C. Edmonds sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily C. Edmonds is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with significant contributions in psychiatry and mental health, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, physiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their work covers major topics such as dementia and cognitive impairment research, neurological disease mechanisms and treatments, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, functional brain connectivity studies, health and environmental impacts on cognitive aging, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, and advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

Recent publications by Edmonds include:

  • "Regional hyperperfusion in older adults with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline," 2020, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • "Patterns of longitudinal cortical atrophy over 3 years in empirically derived MCI subtypes," 2020, Neurology
  • "Prediabetes Is Associated With Brain Hypometabolism and Cognitive Decline in a Sex-Dependent Manner: A Longitudinal Study of Nondemented Older Adults," 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Elevated plasma neurofilament light predicts a faster rate of cognitive decline over 5 years in participants with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline and MCI," 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Diagnosing cognitive disorders in older adults with epilepsy," 2020, Epilepsia

Frequent coauthors of Edmonds include:

  • Kelsey R. Thomas
  • Mark W. Bondi
  • Katherine J. Bangen
  • Alexandra J. Weigand
  • Lauren Edwards

Most publications by Edmonds appear in prominent venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Neurology
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;Amy J. Jak;Lindsay R. Clark

  • Alzheimer’s Disease: Past, Present, and Future

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;David P. Salmon

  • Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lindsay R. Clark;Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak

  • SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE COMPLAINTS CONTRIBUTE TO MISDIAGNOSIS OF MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

    Emily Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Douglas Galasko;David Salmon

  • Subtle Cognitive Decline and Biomarker Staging in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Douglas R. Galasko;Douglas R. Galasko;David P. Salmon

  • Early versus late MCI: Improved MCI staging using a neuropsychological approach

    Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds;Carrie R. McDonald;Anisa Marshall;Kelsey R. Thomas;Kelsey R. Thomas

  • Pulse Pressure in Relation to Tau-Mediated Neurodegeneration, Cerebral Amyloidosis, and Progression to Dementia in Very Old Adults

    Daniel A. Nation;Emily C. Edmonds;Katherine J. Bangen;Katherine J. Bangen;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • Objective subtle cognitive difficulties predict future amyloid accumulation and neurodegeneration

    Kelsey R. Thomas;Katherine J. Bangen;Alexandra J. Weigand;Emily C. Edmonds

  • "Missed" Mild Cognitive Impairment: High False-Negative Error Rate Based on Conventional Diagnostic Criteria.

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak;Douglas R. Galasko;Douglas R. Galasko

  • Reduced Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Relates to Poorer Cognition in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Madeleine L. Werhane;Alexandra J. Weigand;Alexandra J. Weigand;Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds

  • Using Neuropsychological Process Scores to Identify Subtle Cognitive Decline and Predict Progression to Mild Cognitive Impairment.

    Kelsey R Thomas;Kelsey R Thomas;Emily C Edmonds;Emily C Edmonds;Joel Eppig;David P Salmon

  • Increasing Inaccuracy of Self-Reported Subjective Cognitive Complaints Over 24 Months in Empirically Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

    Emily C Edmonds;Alexandra J Weigand;Kelsey R Thomas;Joel Eppig

  • Heterogeneous cortical atrophy patterns in MCI not captured by conventional diagnostic criteria

    Emily C. Edmonds;Joel Eppig;Mark W. Bondi;Kelly M. Leyden

  • Word-list intrusion errors predict progression to mild cognitive impairment.

    Kelsey R. Thomas;Joel Eppig;Emily C. Edmonds;Diane M. Jacobs

  • Functional connectivity variations in mild cognitive impairment: associations with cognitive function.

    S. Duke Han;Konstantinos Arfanakis;Debra A. Fleischman;Sue E. Leurgans

  • Cognitive dispersion is a sensitive marker for early neurodegenerative changes and functional decline in nondemented older adults.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Alexandra J. Weigand;Kelsey R. Thomas;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • MCI-to-normal reversion using neuropsychological criteria in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

    Kelsey R. Thomas;Kelsey R. Thomas;Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds;Joel S. Eppig;Christina G. Wong;Christina G. Wong

  • Regional hyperperfusion in older adults with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline.

    Kelsey R Thomas;Kelsey R Thomas;Jessica R Osuna;Jessica R Osuna;Alexandra J Weigand;Alexandra J Weigand;Emily C Edmonds;Emily C Edmonds

  • Statistically Derived Subtypes and Associations with Cerebrospinal Fluid and Genetic Biomarkers in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Latent Profile Analysis.

    Joel S Eppig;Emily C Edmonds;Laura Campbell;Mark Sanderson-Cimino

  • Cerebral Blood Flow and Amyloid-β Interact to Affect Memory Performance in Cognitively Normal Older Adults.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Alexandra L. Clark;Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds;Nicole D. Evangelista

  • Cortical Amyloid Burden Differences Across Empirically-Derived Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtypes and Interaction with APOE ɛ4 Genotype.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Alexandra L. Clark;Alexandra L. Clark;Madeline Werhane;Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Lisa Delano-Wood
Lisa Delano-Wood University of California, San Diego
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Amy J. Jak
Amy J. Jak University of California, San Diego
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Christina E. Wierenga
Christina E. Wierenga University of California, San Diego
William S. Kremen
William S. Kremen University of California, San Diego
Dilip V. Jeste
Dilip V. Jeste University of California, San Diego
Diane M. Jacobs
Diane M. Jacobs University of California, San Diego
Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to a wide range of career opportunities across the United States. Many graduates are drawn to roles in counseling and mental health, with substance abuse counseling being a particularly high-demand field. The pathway to becoming a counselor varies by state, so it's crucial to understand local requirements.

For example, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Miami emphasize specific certifications and supervised clinical hours. If you're considering practicing in Wisconsin, check out the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Milwaukee, which highlight the importance of state-approved coursework.

In Minnesota, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Minneapolis discuss licensure exams and education credentials needed to enter the profession. Additionally, those interested in Tennessee can review the process for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Nashville for detailed state-specific guidelines.

Whether you aim to become a counselor or pursue another psychology-related career, online degree programs provide the flexibility to meet state requirements while building real-world skills.

Best Scientists Citing Emily C. Edmonds

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles