World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
37290
World Ranking
9979
National Ranking
5136

Neuroscience

D-Index
94
Citations
37084
World Ranking
934
National Ranking
501

Rhoda Au publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rhoda Au sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 388 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rhoda Au D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rhoda Au sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rhoda Au is a researcher affiliated with Boston University in the United States, specializing in the field of medicine with a focus on dementia and cognitive impairment research. Their work spans multiple subfields including psychiatry and mental health, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and epidemiology.

The main topics addressed in their research comprise:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet

Rhoda Au has contributed extensively to scholarly publications, with notable recent papers including:

  • "Development and validation of an interpretable deep learning framework for Alzheimer's disease classification" (2020, Brain)
  • "Multimodal deep learning for Alzheimer's disease dementia assessment" (2022, Nature Communications)
  • "Deep ensemble learning for Alzheimer's disease classification" (2020, Journal of Biomedical Informatics)
  • "Metabolic Network Analysis Reveals Altered Bile Acid Synthesis and Metabolism in Alzheimer's Disease" (2020, Cell Reports Medicine)
  • "Designing the next-generation clinical care pathway for Alzheimer's disease" (2022, Nature Aging)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Ting Fang Alvin Ang
  • Jesse Mez
  • Vijaya B. Kolachalama
  • Lindsay A. Farrer
  • Sherral Devine

Rhoda Au's work appears regularly in prominent publication venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease.

    Sudha Seshadri;Annette L. Fitzpatrick;M Arfan Ikram;Anita L. DeStefano

  • The Lifetime Risk of Stroke Estimates From the Framingham Study

    Sudha Seshadri;Alexa Beiser;Margaret Kelly-Hayes;Carlos S. Kase

  • The Preclinical Phase of Alzheimer Disease: A 22-Year Prospective Study of the Framingham Cohort

    Merrill F. Elias;Alexa Beiser;Philip A. Wolf;Rhoda Au

  • Midlife vascular risk factor exposure accelerates structural brain aging and cognitive decline.

    S. Debette;S. Seshadri;S. Seshadri;A. Beiser;A. Beiser;R. Au;R. Au

  • Plasma phosphatidylcholine docosahexaenoic acid content and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Framingham Heart Study.

    Ernst J. Schaefer;Vanina Bongard;Alexa S. Beiser;Stefania Lamon-Fava

  • Measures of brain morphology and infarction in the framingham heart study: establishing what is normal

    Charles DeCarli;Joseph Massaro;Danielle J Harvey;John Hald

  • Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;Amy J. Jak;Lindsay R. Clark

  • Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Sex Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-analysis

    Scott C. Neu;Judy Pa;Walter Kukull;Duane Beekly

  • Depressive symptoms and risk of dementia: the Framingham Heart Study

    Jane S. Saczynski;Alexa Beiser;Sudha Seshadri;S. Auerbach

  • Cumulative Head Impact Exposure Predicts Later-Life Depression, Apathy, Executive Dysfunction, and Cognitive Impairment in Former High School and College Football Players

    Montenigro Ph;Alosco Ml;Martin Bm;Daneshvar Dh

  • Lifetime risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease: The impact of mortality on risk estimates in the Framingham Study

    S. Seshadri;P. A. Wolf;A. Beiser;R. Au

  • Association of MRI Markers of Vascular Brain Injury With Incident Stroke, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Mortality The Framingham Offspring Study

    Stéphanie Debette;Alexa Beiser;Alexa Beiser;Charles DeCarli;Rhoda Au;Rhoda Au

  • Inflammatory markers and the risk of Alzheimer disease: The Framingham Study

    Z. S. Tan;A. S. Beiser;R. S. Vasan;R. Roubenoff

  • Association of plasma leptin levels with incident Alzheimer disease and MRI measures of brain aging.

    Wolfgang Lieb;Alexa S. Beiser;Alexa S. Beiser;Ramachandran S. Vasan;Ramachandran S. Vasan;Zaldy S. Tan

  • Gender and incidence of dementia in the Framingham Heart Study from mid-adult life

    Geneviève Chêne;Alexa Beiser;Rhoda Au;Sarah R. Preis

  • Inverse association between cancer and Alzheimer's disease: results from the Framingham Heart Study

    Jane A Driver;Alexa Beiser;Rhoda Au;Bernard E Kreger

  • School start times for adolescents

    Rhoda Au;Mary Carskadon;Richard Millman;Amy Wolfson

  • Dementia After Stroke The Framingham Study

    Cristina S. Ivan;Sudha Seshadri;Alexa Beiser;Rhoda Au

  • Association of white matter hyperintensity volume with decreased cognitive functioning: the Framingham Heart Study.

    Rhoda Au;Joseph M. Massaro;Philip A. Wolf;Megan E. Young

  • Apolipoprotein E element 4 association with dementia in a population-based study The Framingham Study

    R. H. Myers;E. J. Schaefer;P.W.F. Wilson;R. D'Agostino

  • Plasma Phosphatidylcholine Docosahexaenoic Acid Content and Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer Disease

    Ernst J. Schaefer;Vanina Bongard;Alexa S. Beiser;Stefania Lamon-Fava

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip A. Wolf
Philip A. Wolf Boston University
Sudha Seshadri
Sudha Seshadri The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Alexa Beiser
Alexa Beiser Boston University
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis
Ramachandran S. Vasan
Ramachandran S. Vasan The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Joseph M. Massaro
Joseph M. Massaro Boston University
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Lisa Delano-Wood
Lisa Delano-Wood University of California, San Diego
Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Emelia J. Benjamin
Emelia J. Benjamin Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, you may also be exploring other online degrees and career options in related fields. Choosing one of the best degrees to make money is an important consideration, especially if future salary potential matters to you. Fields such as computer science, engineering, and health sciences often offer lucrative opportunities alongside neuroscience.

Flexible study options are available through a range of accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, allowing you to reduce costs while earning your degree. These institutions are accredited and eligible for federal financial aid, helping make higher education more affordable and accessible.

For those seeking to boost credentials quickly, there are a variety of certificates i can get online that can lead to high-paying positions in healthcare, data analytics, and technology. Many certificates are designed for rapid completion and immediate workforce entry.

If you’re also interested in finding programs that are more flexible or less demanding, check out some of the easiest online college options. These programs can be a suitable choice if you’re balancing studies with work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Rhoda Au

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles