World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
9195
World Ranking
6165
National Ranking
3353

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
9607
World Ranking
6164
National Ranking
2694

Lisa Delano-Wood publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Delano-Wood sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 202 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lisa Delano-Wood D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Delano-Wood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa Delano-Wood is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the broad field of Medicine, with a significant focus on several subfields including Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Emergency Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics of Lisa Delano-Wood's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments.

Lisa Delano-Wood has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Mark W. Bondi
  • Victoria C. Merritt
  • Katherine J. Bangen
  • Alexandra L. Clark
  • Kelsey R. Thomas

Among Lisa Delano-Wood's recent publications are:

  • "Alzheimer Disease as a Clinical-Biological Construct-An International Working Group Recommendation" (2024), published in JAMA Neurology
  • "APOE interacts with tau PET to influence memory independently of amyloid PET in older adults without dementia" (2020), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Association of anticholinergic medications and AD biomarkers with incidence of MCI among cognitively normal older adults" (2020), published in Neurology
  • "Prediabetes Is Associated With Brain Hypometabolism and Cognitive Decline in a Sex-Dependent Manner: A Longitudinal Study of Nondemented Older Adults" (2021), published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Elevated plasma neurofilament light predicts a faster rate of cognitive decline over 5 years in participants with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline and MCI" (2021), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia

Best Publications

  • Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment.

    Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak;Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina Wierenga;Christina Wierenga

  • Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;Amy J. Jak;Lindsay R. Clark

  • Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer's disease supports retrogenesis.

    Nikki H. Stricker;B. C. Schweinsburg;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga

  • Neuropsychological Contributions to the Early Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease

    Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Amy J. Jak;Lisa Delano-Wood;Mark W. Jacobson

  • Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lindsay R. Clark;Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak

  • SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE COMPLAINTS CONTRIBUTE TO MISDIAGNOSIS OF MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

    Emily Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Douglas Galasko;David Salmon

  • Subtle Cognitive Decline and Biomarker Staging in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Douglas R. Galasko;Douglas R. Galasko;David P. Salmon

  • Are Empirically-Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment Consistent with Conventional Subtypes?

    Lindsay R. Clark;Lisa Delano-Wood;David J. Libon;Carrie R. McDonald

  • Combined neuropathological pathways account for age‐related risk of dementia

    Melinda C. Power;Elizabeth Mormino;Anja Soldan;Bryan D. James

  • Heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment: Differences in neuropsychological profile and associated white matter lesion pathology

    Lisa Delano-Wood;Mark W. Bondi;Joshua Sacco;Norm Abeles

  • Complex activities of daily living vary by mild cognitive impairment subtype.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Amy J. Jak;Dawn M. Schiehser;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • Regional White Matter Pathology in Mild Cognitive Impairment Differential Influence of Lesion Type on Neuropsychological Functioning

    Lisa Delano-Wood;Norm Abeles;Joshua M. Sacco;Christina E. Wierenga

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Correlation with Early Neuropsychological Impairment: A Longitudinal Study

    Vigneswaran Veeramuthu;Vairavan Narayanan;Tan Li Kuo;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • Synergistic Effects of HIV Infection and Older Age on Daily Functioning

    Erin E. Morgan;Jennifer E. Iudicello;Erica Weber;Nichole A. Duarte

  • Early versus late MCI: Improved MCI staging using a neuropsychological approach

    Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds;Carrie R. McDonald;Anisa Marshall;Kelsey R. Thomas;Kelsey R. Thomas

  • Pulse Pressure in Relation to Tau-Mediated Neurodegeneration, Cerebral Amyloidosis, and Progression to Dementia in Very Old Adults

    Daniel A. Nation;Emily C. Edmonds;Katherine J. Bangen;Katherine J. Bangen;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • APOE genotype modifies the relationship between midlife vascular risk factors and later cognitive decline.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Alexa Beiser;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Daniel A. Nation

  • Objective subtle cognitive difficulties predict future amyloid accumulation and neurodegeneration

    Kelsey R. Thomas;Katherine J. Bangen;Alexandra J. Weigand;Emily C. Edmonds

  • Verbal Serial List Learning in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Profile Analysis of Interference, Forgetting, and Errors

    David J. Libon;Mark W. Bondi;Catherine C. Price;Melissa Lamar

  • Aggregate effects of vascular risk factors on cerebrovascular changes in autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Daniel A. Nation;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Gali H. Weissberger

  • Pulse pressure is associated with Alzheimer biomarkers in cognitively normal older adults.

    Daniel A. Nation;Steven D. Edland;Mark W. Bondi;David P. Salmon

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Katherine J. Bangen
Katherine J. Bangen University of California, San Diego
Amy J. Jak
Amy J. Jak University of California, San Diego
Emily C. Edmonds
Emily C. Edmonds University of Arizona
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Douglas Galasko
Douglas Galasko University of California, San Diego
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Christina E. Wierenga
Christina E. Wierenga University of California, San Diego
Rhoda Au
Rhoda Au Boston University
Dean C. Delis
Dean C. Delis University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying neuroscience, there are a variety of related online degrees and flexible career pathways you can pursue. Earning an online bachelor's degree is an accessible way to launch your career with the convenience of remote learning. Many online programs allow accelerated study, making it possible to complete your degree faster and start gaining professional experience sooner.

When choosing a major, it’s important to consider both your interests and future earning potential. Some fields related to neuroscience are consistently ranked among the best degree in the world for long-term career prospects. If high earning potential is a priority, explore what degrees make the most money to see where neuroscience and allied sciences stand.

Cost is another crucial factor. Fortunately, numerous accredited institutions offer affordable tuition and accept federal financial aid. Discover some of the most budget-friendly colleges online that accept fafsa, making quality education in the neurosciences accessible for nearly any budget.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Delano-Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles