World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6165 5730 3353 3040 176 9195
Neuroscience 48 6164 5678 2694 2430 202 9607

Lisa Delano-Wood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa Delano-Wood between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa Delano-Wood published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 12 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
2003 2025

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa Delano-Wood: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 6
2010 8
2011 6
2012 6
2013 7
2014 12
2015 12
2016 17
2017 14
2018 23
2019 16
2020 13
2021 27
2022 8
2023 13
2024 7
2025 5
Total 206
Download as CSV

Lisa Delano-Wood publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Delano-Wood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 202 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306 202
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa Delano-Wood D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Delano-Wood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 48
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa Delano-Wood is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the broad field of Medicine, with a significant focus on several subfields including Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Emergency Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics of Lisa Delano-Wood's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments.

Lisa Delano-Wood has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Mark W. Bondi
  • Victoria C. Merritt
  • Katherine J. Bangen
  • Alexandra L. Clark
  • Kelsey R. Thomas

Among Lisa Delano-Wood's recent publications are:

  • "Alzheimer Disease as a Clinical-Biological Construct-An International Working Group Recommendation" (2024), published in JAMA Neurology
  • "APOE interacts with tau PET to influence memory independently of amyloid PET in older adults without dementia" (2020), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Association of anticholinergic medications and AD biomarkers with incidence of MCI among cognitively normal older adults" (2020), published in Neurology
  • "Prediabetes Is Associated With Brain Hypometabolism and Cognitive Decline in a Sex-Dependent Manner: A Longitudinal Study of Nondemented Older Adults" (2021), published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Elevated plasma neurofilament light predicts a faster rate of cognitive decline over 5 years in participants with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline and MCI" (2021), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia

Best Publications

  • Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment.

    Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak;Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina Wierenga;Christina Wierenga

  • Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;Amy J. Jak;Lindsay R. Clark

  • Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer's disease supports retrogenesis.

    Nikki H. Stricker;B. C. Schweinsburg;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga

  • Neuropsychological Contributions to the Early Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease

    Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Amy J. Jak;Lisa Delano-Wood;Mark W. Jacobson

  • Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lindsay R. Clark;Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak

  • SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE COMPLAINTS CONTRIBUTE TO MISDIAGNOSIS OF MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

    Emily Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Douglas Galasko;David Salmon

  • Subtle Cognitive Decline and Biomarker Staging in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Douglas R. Galasko;Douglas R. Galasko;David P. Salmon

  • Are Empirically-Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment Consistent with Conventional Subtypes?

    Lindsay R. Clark;Lisa Delano-Wood;David J. Libon;Carrie R. McDonald

  • Combined neuropathological pathways account for age‐related risk of dementia

    Melinda C. Power;Elizabeth Mormino;Anja Soldan;Bryan D. James

  • Heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment: Differences in neuropsychological profile and associated white matter lesion pathology

    Lisa Delano-Wood;Mark W. Bondi;Joshua Sacco;Norm Abeles

  • Complex activities of daily living vary by mild cognitive impairment subtype.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Amy J. Jak;Dawn M. Schiehser;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • Regional White Matter Pathology in Mild Cognitive Impairment Differential Influence of Lesion Type on Neuropsychological Functioning

    Lisa Delano-Wood;Norm Abeles;Joshua M. Sacco;Christina E. Wierenga

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Correlation with Early Neuropsychological Impairment: A Longitudinal Study

    Vigneswaran Veeramuthu;Vairavan Narayanan;Tan Li Kuo;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • Synergistic Effects of HIV Infection and Older Age on Daily Functioning

    Erin E. Morgan;Jennifer E. Iudicello;Erica Weber;Nichole A. Duarte

  • Early versus late MCI: Improved MCI staging using a neuropsychological approach

    Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds;Carrie R. McDonald;Anisa Marshall;Kelsey R. Thomas;Kelsey R. Thomas

  • Pulse Pressure in Relation to Tau-Mediated Neurodegeneration, Cerebral Amyloidosis, and Progression to Dementia in Very Old Adults

    Daniel A. Nation;Emily C. Edmonds;Katherine J. Bangen;Katherine J. Bangen;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • APOE genotype modifies the relationship between midlife vascular risk factors and later cognitive decline.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Alexa Beiser;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Daniel A. Nation

  • Objective subtle cognitive difficulties predict future amyloid accumulation and neurodegeneration

    Kelsey R. Thomas;Katherine J. Bangen;Alexandra J. Weigand;Emily C. Edmonds

  • Verbal Serial List Learning in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Profile Analysis of Interference, Forgetting, and Errors

    David J. Libon;Mark W. Bondi;Catherine C. Price;Melissa Lamar

  • Aggregate effects of vascular risk factors on cerebrovascular changes in autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Daniel A. Nation;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Gali H. Weissberger

  • Pulse pressure is associated with Alzheimer biomarkers in cognitively normal older adults.

    Daniel A. Nation;Steven D. Edland;Mark W. Bondi;David P. Salmon

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Katherine J. Bangen
Katherine J. Bangen University of California, San Diego
Amy J. Jak
Amy J. Jak University of California, San Diego
Emily C. Edmonds
Emily C. Edmonds University of Arizona
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Douglas Galasko
Douglas Galasko University of California, San Diego
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Christina E. Wierenga
Christina E. Wierenga University of California, San Diego
Rhoda Au
Rhoda Au Boston University
Dean C. Delis
Dean C. Delis University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying neuroscience, there are a variety of related online degrees and flexible career pathways you can pursue. Earning an online bachelor's degree is an accessible way to launch your career with the convenience of remote learning. Many online programs allow accelerated study, making it possible to complete your degree faster and start gaining professional experience sooner.

When choosing a major, it’s important to consider both your interests and future earning potential. Some fields related to neuroscience are consistently ranked among the best degree in the world for long-term career prospects. If high earning potential is a priority, explore what degrees make the most money to see where neuroscience and allied sciences stand.

Cost is another crucial factor. Fortunately, numerous accredited institutions offer affordable tuition and accept federal financial aid. Discover some of the most budget-friendly colleges online that accept fafsa, making quality education in the neurosciences accessible for nearly any budget.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Delano-Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles