What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Phytophthora infestans, Population genetics, Genetics, Ecology and Blight are his primary areas of study.
The concepts of his Phytophthora infestans study are interwoven with issues in Genetic variation, Mating type and Genotype.
Genetics and Mycosphaerella are frequently intertwined in his study.
His research integrates issues of Root crops, Phycomycetes and Genetic diversity in his study of Ecology.
The Blight study combines topics in areas such as Phytophthora and Genetic drift.
His Genome research incorporates themes from Mycosphaerella graminicola, Septoria and Gene rearrangement.
His most cited work include:
- Finished Genome of the Fungal Wheat Pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola Reveals Dispensome Structure, Chromosome Plasticity, and Stealth Pathogenesis (401 citations)
- Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus. (394 citations)
- Diverse Lifestyles and Strategies of Plant Pathogenesis Encoded in the Genomes of Eighteen Dothideomycetes Fungi (376 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Genetics, Mycosphaerella graminicola, Botany, Genome and Graminicola.
Stephen B. Goodwin combines topics linked to Mycosphaerella with his work on Genetics.
His study in the field of Phytophthora infestans, Fungicide, Fungi imperfecti and Hordeum vulgare also crosses realms of Puccinia.
Stephen B. Goodwin combines subjects such as Phytophthora, Phycomycetes and Metalaxyl with his study of Phytophthora infestans.
His study focuses on the intersection of Genome and fields such as Dothideomycetes with connections in the field of Evolutionary biology.
Stephen B. Goodwin interconnects Plant disease resistance and Marker-assisted selection in the investigation of issues within Graminicola.
He most often published in these fields:
- Genetics (51.38%)
- Mycosphaerella graminicola (31.19%)
- Botany (28.44%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?
- Genetics (51.38%)
- Genome (23.85%)
- Gene (19.27%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Stephen B. Goodwin mostly deals with Genetics, Genome, Gene, Mycosphaerella graminicola and Botany.
Stephen B. Goodwin studies Dothideomycetes, a branch of Genetics.
His work on Genome evolution, Comparative genomics and Gene family as part of his general Genome study is frequently connected to Pathogenesis, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His work deals with themes such as Fusarium and Fungus, which intersect with Gene.
Much of his study explores Mycosphaerella graminicola relationship to Graminicola.
Stephen B. Goodwin works on Botany which deals in particular with Mycosphaerella.
Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Comparative genomics of a plant-pathogenic fungus, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, reveals transduplication and the impact of repeat elements on pathogenicity and population divergence. (117 citations)
- The landscape of transposable elements in the finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. (46 citations)
- Horizontal gene transfer and gene dosage drives adaptation to wood colonization in a tree pathogen. (42 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Stephen B. Goodwin mainly focuses on Genome, Genetics, Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerella and Botany.
His study in Genome is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Adaptation and Black sigatoka.
His work on Genetics deals in particular with Comparative genomics and Gene family.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Plant disease resistance, Leptosphaeria maculans and Genetic diversity in addition to Mycosphaerella.
His Botany study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Gene dosage and Gene cluster, Gene.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mycosphaerella graminicola, Phylogenetics, Graminicola, Gene prediction and Transposable element.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
