World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
14154
World Ranking
11297
National Ranking
291

Cees Waalwijk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees Waalwijk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 171 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Cees Waalwijk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees Waalwijk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cees Waalwijk is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the domains of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these fields, their work is particularly focused on Plant Science, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Microbiology, and Insect Science.

The central themes in their scientific contributions revolve around Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food, Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases, Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, Plant Disease Management Techniques, and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Cees Waalwijk include:

  • No to Neocosmospora: Phylogenomic and Practical Reasons for Continued Inclusion of the Fusarium solani Species Complex in the Genus Fusarium, 2020, mSphere
  • Fusarium graminearum Species Complex: A Bibliographic Analysis and Web-Accessible Database for Global Mapping of Species and Trichothecene Toxin Chemotypes, 2021, Phytopathology
  • Presence of the Weakly Pathogenic Fusarium poae in the Fusarium Head Blight Disease Complex Hampers Biocontrol and Chemical Control of the Virulent Fusarium graminearum Pathogen, 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • At the scene of the crime: New insights into the role of weakly pathogenic members of the fusarium head blight disease complex, 2020, Molecular Plant Pathology
  • Contamination and Translocation of Deoxynivalenol and Its Derivatives Associated with Fusarium Crown Rot of Wheat in Northern China, 2021, Plant Disease

Frequent collaborators in Cees Waalwijk's work include Théo van der Lee, Balázs Brankovics, Hao Zhang, Anne D. van Diepeningen, and Wanquan Chen.

Their research has appeared in several publication venues, notably:

  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Plant Disease
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • mSphere
  • Phytopathology

Best Publications

  • The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants

    Angélique D'hont;Jean Marc Aury;Franc Christophe Baurens

  • The Fusarium graminearum Genome Reveals a Link Between Localized Polymorphism and Pathogen Specialization

    Christina A. Cuomo;Ulrich Güldener;Jin Rong Xu;Frances Trail

  • Finished Genome of the Fungal Wheat Pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola Reveals Dispensome Structure, Chromosome Plasticity, and Stealth Pathogenesis

    Stephen B. Goodwin;Sarrah Ben M'Barek;Braham Dhillon;Alexander H J Wittenberg

  • Gene Genealogies and AFLP Analyses in the Fusarium oxysporum Complex Identify Monophyletic and Nonmonophyletic Formae Speciales Causing Wilt and Rot Disease

    Robert P. Baayen;Kerry O'Donnell;Peter J. M. Bonants;Elizabeth Cigelnik

  • MspI, an isoschizomer of hpaII which cleaves both unmethylated and methylated hpaII sites.

    C. Waalwijk;R.A. Flavell

  • Major changes in Fusarium spp. in wheat in the Netherlands

    Cees Waalwijk;Pieter Kastelein;Ineke de Vries;Zoltan Kerényi

  • A two-locus DNA sequence database for typing plant and human pathogens within the Fusarium oxysporum species complex

    Kerry O'Donnell;Cécile Gueidan;Stacy Sink;Peter R. Johnston

  • A molecular diagnostic for tropical race 4 of the banana fusarium wilt pathogen

    M. A. Dita;C. Waalwijk;I. W. Buddenhagen;M. T. Souza

  • DNA methylation at a CCGG sequence in the large intron of the rabbit β-globin gene: tissue-specific variations

    C. Waalwijk;R.A. Flavell

  • One Fungus, One Name: Defining the Genus Fusarium in a Scientifically Robust Way That Preserves Longstanding Use

    David M. Geiser;Takayuki Aoki;Charles W. Bacon;Scott E. Baker

  • Quantitative detection of Fusarium species in wheat using TaqMan

    Cees Waalwijk;Ruth van der Heide;Ineke de Vries;Theo van der Lee

  • A basic serine protease from Paecilomyces lilacinus with biological activity against Meloidogyne hapla eggs.

    P.J.M. Bonants;P.F.L. Fitters;H. Thijs;E. den Belder

  • Worse Comes to Worst: Bananas and Panama Disease--When Plant and Pathogen Clones Meet.

    Nadia Ordonez;Michael F. Seidl;Cees Waalwijk;André Drenth

  • Biogeography of Fusarium graminearum species complex and chemotypes: a review

    Theo van der Lee;Hao Zhang;Anne van Diepeningen;Cees Waalwijk

  • The genetic basis for 3-ADON and 15-ADON trichothecene chemotypes in Fusarium.

    Nancy J. Alexander;Susan P. McCormick;Cees Waalwijk;Theo van der Lee

  • Population analysis of the Fusarium graminearum species complex from wheat in China show a shift to more aggressive isolates.

    Hao Zhang;Theo Van der Lee;Cees Waalwijk;Wanquan Chen

  • Mating type sequences in asexually reproducing Fusarium species.

    Zoltán Kerényi;Antonio Moretti;Cees Waalwijk;Brigitta Oláh

  • Molecular cloning and the nucleotide sequence of the Mr 28 000 crystal protein gene of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.

    Cees Waalwijk;Annette M. Dullemans;Mariëlle E.S. van Workum;Bert Visser

  • Successful crosses and molecular tetrad and progeny analyses demonstrate heterothallism in Mycosphaerella graminicola

    Gert H. J. Kema;Els C. P. Verstappen;Maria Todorova;Cees Waalwijk

  • A molecular diagnostic for tropical race 4 of the banana

    M.A. Dita Rodriguez;C. Waalwijk;I.W. Buddenhagen;M.T. Souza

Frequent Co-Authors

Theo van der Lee
Theo van der Lee Wageningen University & Research
Gert H. J. Kema
Gert H. J. Kema Wageningen University & Research
R. P. Baayen
R. P. Baayen Wageningen University & Research
Antonio Moretti
Antonio Moretti National Research Council (CNR)
Robert H. Proctor
Robert H. Proctor United States Department of Agriculture
Kerry O'Donnell
Kerry O'Donnell National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research
Todd J. Ward
Todd J. Ward United States Department of Agriculture
Stephen B. Goodwin
Stephen B. Goodwin Purdue University West Lafayette
Pierre J. G. M. de Wit
Pierre J. G. M. de Wit Wageningen University & Research
Altus Viljoen
Altus Viljoen Stellenbosch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a range of flexible online degrees and career options. Many students are now considering specialized programs in healthcare, nutrition, and administration to enhance their job prospects.

For those interested in the mental health field, pursuing pmhnp programs is a popular online pathway leading to roles as psychiatric nurse practitioners. Alternatively, an online nutrition degree can provide foundational knowledge in biochemistry and dietetics, paving the way for careers in wellness and healthcare consulting.

If you’re interested in healthcare leadership, an mba healthcare management online offers training in both science and business, preparing graduates for managerial roles in healthcare organizations.

Finally, medical coding and data management are crucial for clinical operations. Comparing cpc certification options can help those interested in administrative pathways make informed decisions about certification types and salary prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Cees Waalwijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles