World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kim E. Hammond-Kosack

Kim E. Hammond-Kosack

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 72 2091 1989 259 249 266 30938

Kim E. Hammond-Kosack publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kim E. Hammond-Kosack between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kim E. Hammond-Kosack published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2008. 8 of the 337 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2008. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 3 publications
1989 2026

337 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kim E. Hammond-Kosack: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 5
1995 2
1996 6
1997 2
1998 5
1999 1
2000 4
2001 0
2002 2
2003 5
2004 6
2005 12
2006 18
2007 25
2008 26
2009 15
2010 9
2011 17
2012 23
2013 18
2014 13
2015 19
2016 18
2017 10
2018 14
2019 13
2020 5
2021 9
2022 2
2023 8
2024 12
2025 5
2026 3
Total 337
Download as CSV

Kim E. Hammond-Kosack publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim E. Hammond-Kosack sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 265–274 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 266 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88 266
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Kim E. Hammond-Kosack D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim E. Hammond-Kosack sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150 72
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Kim E. Hammond-Kosack is affiliated with Rothamsted Research in the United Kingdom. Their research has made significant contributions across several areas within agricultural and biological sciences, with a focus on plant science and molecular biology.

The primary fields of study for Hammond-Kosack include Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans subfields such as Plant Science, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Ecology.

The scientific topics frequently covered in Hammond-Kosack's publications include:

  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Their recent papers reflect an engagement with genome resources, pathogen-host interactions, and plant pathogen effector biology. Selected publications include:

  • "Ensembl Genomes 2022: an expanding genome resource for non-vertebrates," 2021, published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Phylogenomic Analysis of a 55.1-kb 19-Gene Dataset Resolves a Monophyletic Fusarium that Includes the Fusarium solani Species Complex," 2020, published in Phytopathology
  • "PHI-base in 2022: a multi-species phenotype database for Pathogen-Host Interactions," 2021, published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Proteinaceous effector discovery and characterization in filamentous plant pathogens," 2020, published in Molecular Plant Pathology
  • "Take-All Disease: New Insights into an Important Wheat Root Pathogen," 2021, published in Trends in Plant Science

Frequent coauthors contributing to Hammond-Kosack's body of work include Martin Urban, Gail Canning, Alayne Cuzick, James Seager, and Javier Palma-Guerrero.

Hammond-Kosack's publications often appear in key journals and platforms such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nucleic Acids Research, Molecular Plant Pathology, Trends in Plant Science, and the Journal of Experimental Botany.

Best Publications

  • The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology

    Ralph A. Dean;Jan A. L. van Kan;Zacharias A. Pretorius;Kim E. Hammond-Kosack

  • Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses.

    Kim E. Hammond-Kosack;Jonathan D. G. Jones

  • Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium

    Li Jun Ma;H. Charlotte Van Der Does;Katherine A. Borkovich;Jeffrey J. Coleman

  • Plant Disease Resistance Genes

    Kim E. Hammond-Kosack;Jonathan D. G. Jones

  • Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging

    David A. Jones;Colwyn M. Thomas;Kim E. Hammond-Kosack;Peter J. Balint-Kurti

  • The Fusarium graminearum Genome Reveals a Link Between Localized Polymorphism and Pathogen Specialization

    Christina A. Cuomo;Ulrich Güldener;Jin Rong Xu;Frances Trail

  • Deciphering plant–pathogen communication: fresh perspectives for molecular resistance breeding

    Kim E Hammond-Kosack;Jane E Parker

  • A review of wheat diseases-a field perspective.

    Melania Figueroa;Kim E. Hammond-Kosack;Peter S. Solomon

  • Novel Disease Resistance Specificities Result From Sequence Exchange Between Tandemly Repeated Genes at the Cf-4/9 Locus of Tomato

    Martin Parniske;Kim E Hammond-Kosack;Catherine Golstein;Colwyn M Thomas

  • Finished Genome of the Fungal Wheat Pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola Reveals Dispensome Structure, Chromosome Plasticity, and Stealth Pathogenesis

    Stephen B. Goodwin;Sarrah Ben M'Barek;Braham Dhillon;Alexander H J Wittenberg

  • cDNA-AFLP Reveals a Striking Overlap in Race-Specific Resistance and Wound Response Gene Expression Profiles

    Wendy E. Durrant;Owen Rowland;Pedro Piedras;Kim E. Hammond-Kosack

  • Six Arabidopsis thaliana homologues of the human respiratory burst oxidase (gp91phox)

    Miguel Angel Torres;Hitoshi Onouchi;Susuma Hamada;Chiyoko Machida

  • Ensembl Genomes 2020-enabling non-vertebrate genomic research.

    Kevin L. Howe;Bruno Contreras-Moreira;Nishadi De Silva;Gareth Maslen

  • Ensembl Genomes 2018: an integrated omics infrastructure for non-vertebrate species.

    Paul Julian Kersey;James E Allen;Alexis Allot;Matthieu Barba

  • rbohA, a rice homologue of the mammalian gp91phox respiratory burst oxidase gene.

    Quentin J. Groom;Miguel Angel Torres;Anthony P. Fordham-Skelton;Kim E. Hammond-Kosack

  • Transcriptome and metabolite profiling of the infection cycle of Zymoseptoria tritici on wheat reveals a biphasic interaction with plant immunity involving differential pathogen chromosomal contributions and a variation on the hemibiotrophic lifestyle definition.

    Jason J. Rudd;Kostya Kanyuka;Keywan Hassani-Pak;Mark Derbyshire

  • PHI-base: a new database for pathogen host interactions

    Rainer Winnenburg;Thomas K. Baldwin;Martin Urban;Christopher J. Rawlings

  • Responses to plant pathogens

    K. E. Hammond-Kosack;J. D. G. Jones

  • One Fungus, One Name: Defining the Genus Fusarium in a Scientifically Robust Way That Preserves Longstanding Use

    David M. Geiser;Takayuki Aoki;Charles W. Bacon;Scott E. Baker

  • Involvement of Reactive Oxygen Species, Glutathione Metabolism, and Lipid Peroxidation in the Cf-Gene-Dependent Defense Response of Tomato Cotyledons Induced by Race-Specific Elicitors of Cladosporium fulvum

    M. J. May;K. E. Hammond-Kosack;J. D. G. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Urban
Martin Urban Rothamsted Research
Jonathan D. G. Jones
Jonathan D. G. Jones University of East Anglia
Chris Bass
Chris Bass University of Exeter
Andrew L. Phillips
Andrew L. Phillips Rothamsted Research
David A. Jones
David A. Jones Australian National University
Stephen J. Powers
Stephen J. Powers Rothamsted Research
John A. Lucas
John A. Lucas Rothamsted Research
Antonio Di Pietro
Antonio Di Pietro University of Córdoba
Adrian C. Newton
Adrian C. Newton James Hutton Institute
Paul Kersey
Paul Kersey European Bioinformatics Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Genetics is a rapidly growing field that intersects with many health and science professions. Many students studying genetics also consider healthcare career pathways such as nursing, which offer flexibility and strong job prospects in the United States.

If you are interested in advancing your healthcare career online, there are several cost-effective degree options. For those looking to become nurse practitioners, there are a variety of online np programs that are flexible and affordable. Students aiming to complete or further their nursing studies can explore affordable nursing programs for both undergraduate and graduate levels.

Ambitious nurses seeking the highest clinical education can consider enrolling in dnp online programs, which prepare graduates for leadership and advanced practice roles. Additionally, registered nurses looking to earn a bachelor’s degree can find the cheapest online bsn programs, making this educational path more accessible.

These online options provide flexibility for working healthcare professionals and are a great complement to genetics or science-based career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Kim E. Hammond-Kosack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles