World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 52 5299 4866 2366 2134 236 10801

Tatiana Barichello publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tatiana Barichello between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tatiana Barichello published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2020. 43 of the 285 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 20 publications
2002 2025

285 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tatiana Barichello: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 5
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 8
2009 8
2010 8
2011 7
2012 15
2013 9
2014 11
2015 14
2016 11
2017 20
2018 19
2019 22
2020 25
2021 23
2022 14
2023 11
2024 23
2025 20
Total 285
Download as CSV

Tatiana Barichello publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatiana Barichello sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 236 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220 236
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Tatiana Barichello D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatiana Barichello sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418 52
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Tatiana Barichello is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a strong focus on Medicine, Neuroscience, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The subfields most represented in their work include Neurology, Molecular Biology, Biological Psychiatry, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Immunology.

The scientist's main research topics cover a diverse range of biomedical themes. These include:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Barichello has contributed extensively to the scientific literature with 106 publications in Medicine and 94 in Neuroscience. Their work is frequently published in the following academic venues:

  • Molecular Neurobiology (6 publications)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia (6 publications)
  • Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (3 publications)
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (3 publications)
  • Molecular Psychiatry (3 publications)

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • "Biomarkers for sepsis: more than just fever and leukocytosis-a narrative review," 2022, Critical Care
  • "The blood-brain barrier dysfunction in sepsis," 2020, Tissue Barriers

Barichello has also collaborated extensively with a group of frequent co-authors, reflecting ongoing research partnerships. These co-authors include:

  • Vijayasree V. Giridharan
  • Fabrícia Petronilho
  • Jaqueline S. Generoso
  • Felipe Dal-Pizzol
  • João Quevedo

Best Publications

  • Stress and neuroinflammation: a systematic review of the effects of stress on microglia and the implications for mental illness

    Marilia A. Calcia;David R. Bonsall;Peter S. Bloomfield;Sudhakar Selvaraj

  • The role of inflammation and microglial activation in the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders

    G.Z. Réus;G.Z. Réus;G.R. Fries;L. Stertz;M. Badawy

  • The impact of the microbiota-gut-brain axis on Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology.

    Tejaswini Doifode;Vijayasree V. Giridharan;Jaqueline S. Generoso;Gursimrat Bhatti

  • Gut Microbiota, Bacterial Translocation, and Interactions with Diet: Pathophysiological Links between Major Depressive Disorder and Non-Communicable Medical Comorbidities.

    Anastasiya Slyepchenko;Michael H J Maes;Felice N Jacka;Cristiano A. Köhler

  • Antidepressants, antimicrobials or both? Gut microbiota dysbiosis in depression and possible implications of the antimicrobial effects of antidepressant drugs for antidepressant effectiveness.

    Danielle Macedo;Adriano José Maia Chaves Filho;Caren Nádia Soares de Sousa;Joao L De Quevedo

  • The NLRP3 Inflammasome and Its Role in Sepsis Development.

    Lucinéia Gainski Danielski;Amanda Della Giustina;Sandra Bonfante;Tatiana Barichello

  • Oxidative variables in the rat brain after sepsis induced by cecal ligation and perforation.

    Tatiana Barichello;Jucélia J. Fortunato;Ângeles M. Vitali;Gustavo Feier

  • Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly rats.

    Martins Back Netto;Aloir Neri de Oliveira Junior;Mariana Goldim;Khiany Mathias

  • Cognitive impairment in sepsis survivors from cecal ligation and perforation.

    Tatiana Barichello;Márcio R. Martins;Adalisa Reinke;Gustavo Feier

  • Brain Barrier Breakdown as a Cause and Consequence of Neuroinflammation in Sepsis.

    Lucineia Gainski Danielski;Amanda Della Giustina;Marwa Badawy;Tatiana Barichello

  • A systematic review of evidence for the role of inflammatory biomarkers in bipolar patients.

    Pavani Sayana;Gabriela Delevati Colpo;Lutiana R. Simões;Vijayasree Vayalanellore Giridharan

  • The role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric disorders.

    Jaqueline S. Generoso;Vijayasree V. Giridharan;Juneyoung Lee;Danielle Macedo

  • Cognitive dysfunction is sustained after rescue therapy in experimental cerebral malaria, and is reduced by additive antioxidant therapy.

    Patricia A. Reis;Clarissa M. Comim;Fernanda Hermani;Bruno Silva

  • Antioxidant treatment prevented late memory impairment in an animal model of sepsis.

    Tatiana Barichello;Roberta Albino Machado;Larissa Constantino;Samira S. Valvassori

  • Sodium Butyrate Prevents Memory Impairment by Re-establishing BDNF and GDNF Expression in Experimental Pneumococcal Meningitis.

    Tatiana Barichello;Tatiana Barichello;Jaqueline S. Generoso;Lutiana R. Simões;Cristiano Julio Faller

  • Time-dependent behavioral recovery after sepsis in rats

    Lisiane Tuon;Clarissa M. Comim;Fabricia Petronilho;Tatiana Barichello

  • Pathophysiology of neonatal acute bacterial meningitis

    Tatiana Barichello;Glauco D. Fagundes;Jaqueline S. Generoso;Samuel Galvão Elias

  • Receptor for advanced glycation end products mediates sepsis-triggered amyloid-β accumulation, Tau phosphorylation, and cognitive impairment

    Juciano Gasparotto;Carolina S. Girardi;Nauana Somensi;Camila T. Ribeiro

  • CD40-CD40 Ligand Pathway is a Major Component of Acute Neuroinflammation and Contributes to Long-term Cognitive Dysfunction after Sepsis.

    Monique Michels;Lucinéia Gainski Danieslki;Andriele Vieira;Drielly Florentino

  • Postmortem evidence of brain inflammatory markers in bipolar disorder: a systematic review.

    Vijayasree V. Giridharan;Pavani Sayana;Omar F. Pinjari;Naveed Ahmad

  • Neonatal Immune Challenge with Lipopolysaccharide Triggers Long-lasting Sex- and Age-related Behavioral and Immune/Neurotrophic Alterations in Mice: Relevance to Autism Spectrum Disorders.

    Charllyany Sabino Custódio;Bruna Stefânia Ferreira Mello;Adriano José Maia Chaves Filho;Camila Nayane de Carvalho Lima

  • Protein synthesis, PKA, and MAP kinase are differentially involved in short- and long-term memory in rats.

    Joao L De Quevedo;Mônica R M Vianna;Márcio Rodrigo Martins;Tatiana Barichello

  • The Septic Brain

    Emilio L. Streck;Clarissa M. Comim;Tatiana Barichello;João Quevedo

Frequent Co-Authors

João Quevedo
João Quevedo The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Felipe Dal-Pizzol
Felipe Dal-Pizzol Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
Fabricia Petronilho
Fabricia Petronilho Sewanee: The University of the South
Antônio Lúcio Teixeira
Antônio Lúcio Teixeira The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Gislaine Z. Réus
Gislaine Z. Réus Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
Danielle Silveira Macêdo
Danielle Silveira Macêdo Universidade Federal do Ceará
Samira S. Valvassori
Samira S. Valvassori Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
Flávio Kapczinski
Flávio Kapczinski McMaster University
Josiane Budni
Josiane Budni Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
Gabriel R. Fries
Gabriel R. Fries The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience doesn't lock you into just one career. A variety of degrees and certifications can complement or advance your studies—many of which are available online. From behavioral analysis to social work, these options can move your career in promising directions.

If you’re seeking programs with a strong return on investment, look into certifications that pay well. These can boost your resume and open doors across healthcare, education, research, and tech sectors.

For those balancing school with other commitments, online college courses offer flexibility. They let you build a relevant skill set at your own pace, often with transfer-friendly credits toward advanced degrees.

Cost is another factor. Fields like social work and behavior analysis are closely tied to neuroscience and have accessible pathways. Explore cheap online msw programs if you’re interested in mental health or community settings. For those intrigued by applied behavior analysis, consider the cheapest bcba online program options, making specialized training more attainable.

Best Scientists Citing Tatiana Barichello

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles