World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6751
World Ranking
7665
National Ranking
63

Nadja Schröder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadja Schröder sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 128 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nadja Schröder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadja Schröder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadja Schröder is affiliated with the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil. Their research spans key areas within medicine and neuroscience, emphasizing cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, neurology, psychiatry, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their recent publications address diverse topics related to neuropharmacology, cognitive impairment, and neurodegeneration. Some of these works include:

  • Effects of lipoic acid supplementation on age- and iron-induced memory impairment, mitochondrial DNA damage and antioxidant responses (2021, European Journal of Nutrition)
  • The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) regulates recognition and aversively-motivated memory in male rats (2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory)
  • The effects of acute exercise on memory of cognitively healthy seniors: A systematic review (2021, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics)
  • The Role of Ca2+ Permeable AMPA Receptors in Neurodegeneration, Neurotoxicity, and Neuroinflammation (2022, CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets)
  • Behavior, BDNF and epigenetic mechanisms in response to social isolation and social support in middle aged rats exposed to chronic stress (2023, Behavioural Brain Research)

The research areas covered by Nadja Schröder include:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

They have published extensively in venues such as:

  • European Journal of Nutrition
  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Research Square
  • Pneumologie
  • CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets

Nadja Schröder collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Betânia Souza de Freitas
  • Elke Bromberg
  • Patrícia Molz
  • Lariza Oliveira de Souza
  • Gustavo Dalto Barroso Machado

Their multidisciplinary work integrates the study of molecular mechanisms involved in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation, as well as the behavioral effects of stress and social conditions in animal models. The combination of fields such as cellular neuroscience, mental health, and respiratory medicine reflects a broad approach to understanding complex biological and physiological processes.

Best Publications

  • Cannabidiol Reduces the Anxiety Induced by Simulated Public Speaking in Treatment-Naïve Social Phobia Patients

    Mateus M. Bergamaschi;Regina Helena Costa Queiroz;Regina Helena Costa Queiroz;Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas;Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas;Danielle Chaves Gomes De Oliveira;Danielle Chaves Gomes De Oliveira

  • Pre- or post-training administration of the NMDA receptor blocker MK-801 impairs object recognition memory in rats

    Maria Noêmia M. de Lima;Daniela C. Laranja;Elke Bromberg;Rafael Roesler

  • Neurotoxic methamphetamine regimen severely impairs recognition memory in rats

    Nadja Schröder;Steven J. O'Dell;John F. Marshall

  • Anthocyanins are potent antioxidants in model systems but do not reduce endogenous oxidative DNA damage in human colon cells.

    B.L. Pool-Zobel;Achim Bub;N. Schröder;Gerhard Rechkemmer

  • Ketamine impairs recognition memory consolidation and prevents learning-induced increase in hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels

    B.K. Goulart;M.N.M. de Lima;C.B. de Farias;G.K. Reolon

  • Drugs acting upon the cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A signalling pathway modulate memory consolidation when given late after training into rat hippocampus but not amygdala.

    L. Bevilaqua;P. Ardenghi;N. Schröder;E. Bromberg

  • Memantine reduces oxidative damage and enhances long-term recognition memory in aged rats

    C. Pietá Dias;M.N. Martins de Lima;J. Presti-Torres;A. Dornelles

  • Haloperidol- and clozapine-induced oxidative stress in the rat brain.

    Manuela Polydoro;Nadja Schröder;Maria Noemia M. Lima;Fábio Caldana

  • Further evidence for the involvement of a hippocampal cGMP/cGMP- dependent protein kinase cascade in memory consolidation

    Ramón Bernabeu;Nadja Schroder;Joao Quevedo;Martín Cammarota

  • Temporary inactivation reveals an essential role of the dorsal hippocampus in consolidation of object recognition memory.

    Maria Noemia de Lima;Tatiana Luft;Rafael Roesler;Nadja Schröder

  • Neonatal Iron Exposure Induces Neurobehavioural Dysfunctions in Adult Mice

    A. Fredriksson;N. Schröder;P. Eriksson;I. Izquierdo;I. Izquierdo

  • Role of brain iron accumulation in cognitive dysfunction: evidence from animal models and human studies.

    Nadja Schröder;Luciana Silva Figueiredo;Maria Noêmia Martins de Lima

  • Recognition memory impairment and brain oxidative stress induced by postnatal iron administration.

    Maria Noemia M de Lima;Manuela Polydoro;Daniela C Laranja;Fernanda Bonatto

  • Modulatory influence of dopamine receptors on consolidation of object recognition memory.

    Maria Noêmia Martins de Lima;Juliana Presti-Torres;Arethuza Dornelles;Felipe Siciliani Scalco

  • Maze learning and motor activity deficits in adult mice induced by iron exposure during a critical postnatal period.

    Anders Fredriksson;Nadja Schröder;Per Eriksson;Ivan Izquierdo

  • Specialized Cilia in Mammalian Sensory Systems.

    Nathalie Falk;Marlene Lösl;Nadja Schröder;Andreas Gießl

  • Reversal of age-related deficits in object recognition memory in rats with l-deprenyl.

    Maria Noêmia M. de Lima;Daniela C. Laranja;Fábio Caldana;Elke Bromberg

  • Posttraining systemic administration of the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate ameliorates aging-related memory decline in rats

    Gustavo K. Reolon;Natasha Maurmann;Natasha Maurmann;Aline Werenicz;Vanessa A. Garcia

  • Novelty causes time-dependent retrograde amnesia for one-trial avoidance in rats through NMDA receptor- and CaMKII-dependent mechanisms in the hippocampus.

    I. Izquierdo;N. Schröder;C. A. Netto;J. H. Medina

  • Cannabidiol Normalizes Caspase 3, Synaptophysin, and Mitochondrial Fission Protein DNM1L Expression Levels in Rats with Brain Iron Overload: Implications for Neuroprotection

    Vanessa Kappel da Silva;Betânia Souza de Freitas;Arethuza da Silva Dornelles;Laura Roesler Nery

Frequent Co-Authors

Rafael Roesler
Rafael Roesler Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
João Quevedo
João Quevedo The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ivan Izquierdo
Ivan Izquierdo Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Flávio Kapczinski
Flávio Kapczinski McMaster University
Felipe Dal-Pizzol
Felipe Dal-Pizzol Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
José Alexandre de Souza Crippa
José Alexandre de Souza Crippa Universidade de São Paulo
Jorge H. Medina
Jorge H. Medina Buenos Aires Institute of Technology
Antonio Waldo Zuardi
Antonio Waldo Zuardi Universidade de São Paulo
Maurício Reis Bogo
Maurício Reis Bogo Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Antonio Egidio Nardi
Antonio Egidio Nardi Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nadja Schröder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles