World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
6283
World Ranking
6997
National Ranking
55

Daniela M. Barros publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela M. Barros sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniela M. Barros D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela M. Barros sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniela M. Barros is affiliated with the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil. Their research interests span multiple fields related to data and decision sciences, with a focus on the management and quality of data, as well as the application of advanced computational techniques to business and information systems.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Computer Science
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Within these broader fields, their work is further specialized in subfields such as:

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems

The key topics that characterize Daniela M. Barros's research agenda include:

  • Data Quality and Management
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions

Their consistent work in these areas is reflected in publications at specialized venues, with one identified publication venue:

  • Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Development

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Daniela M. Barros, the following stands out:

  • Conceptual Model of a Federated Data Lake (2022), Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Development

This paper represents an example of their engagement with federated data systems and advances in information systems development.

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Pedro Guimarães
  • Maribel Yasmina Santos
  • Vânia Sousa
  • Antonina Santos
  • Diogo Rodrigues

These collaborations have contributed to interdisciplinary research efforts intersecting data management, privacy, and business intelligence.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms for memory types differ.

    Iván Izquierdo;Daniela M. Barros;Tadeu Mello e Souza;Marcia M. de Souza

  • Separate mechanisms for short- and long-term memory.

    Iván Izquierdo;Jorge H. Medina;Mônica R.M. Vianna;Luciana A. Izquierdo

  • Mice Deficient for the Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter Are Myasthenic and Have Deficits in Object and Social Recognition

    Vania F. Prado;Cristina Martins-Silva;Braulio M. de Castro;Ricardo F. Lima

  • Molecular Pharmacological Dissection of Short- and Long-Term Memory

    Luciana A Izquierdo;Daniela M Barros;Monica R M Vianna;Adriana Coitinho

  • Short- and long-term memory are differentially regulated by monoaminergic systems in the rat brain

    Iván Izquierdo;Jorge H. Medina;Luciana A. Izquierdo;Daniela M. Barros

  • Different hippocampal molecular requirements for short- and long-term retrieval of one-trial avoidance learning.

    Luciana A. Izquierdo;Daniela M. Barros;Patricia G. Ardenghi;Patricia Pereira

  • Effect of lyophilised Vaccinium berries on memory, anxiety and locomotion in adult rats.

    Maria Rosana Ramirez;Ivan Izquierdo;Maria do Carmo Bassols Raseira;José Ângelo Zuanazzi

  • Molecular signalling pathways in the cerebral cortex are required for retrieval of one-trial avoidance learning in rats.

    Daniela M Barros;Luciana A Izquierdo;Tadeu Mello e Souza;Patricia G Ardenghi

  • Behavioral and genoprotective effects of Vaccinium berries intake in mice

    Daniela Barros;Olavo B. Amaral;Ivan Izquierdo;Laura Geracitano

  • Simultaneous modulation of retrieval by dopaminergic D1, β-noradrenergic, serotonergic-1A and cholinergic muscarinic receptors in cortical structures of the rat

    Daniela M Barros;Tadéu Mello e Souza;Tiago De David;Humberto Choi

  • Phosphorylated cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein as a Molecular Marker of Memory Processing in Rat Hippocampus: Effect of Novelty

    Haydée Ana María Viola;Melina Furman;Luciana Adriana Izquierdo;Mariana Alonso

  • Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) modifies memory retention in rats.

    Maria E Monzon;Marcia M de Souza;Luciana A Izquierdo;Ivan Izquierdo

  • Differential involvement of cortical receptor mechanisms in working, short-term and long-term memory.

    I lzquierdo;L A Izquierdo;D M Barros;T Mello e Souza

  • Pharmacological demonstration of the differential involvement of protein kinase C isoforms in short- and long-term memory formation and retrieval of one-trial avoidance in rats.

    Monica R. M. Vianna;Daniela M. Barros;Tiago Silva;Humberto Choi

  • Participation of hippocampal metabotropic glutamate receptors, protein kinase A and mitogen-activated protein kinases in memory retrieval.

    G Szapiro;L.A Izquierdo;M Alonso;D Barros

  • Participation of hippocampal nicotinic receptors in acquisition, consolidation and retrieval of memory for one trial inhibitory avoidance in rats

    D. Martí Barros;M.R. Ramirez;E.A. dos Reis;I. Izquierdo

  • Effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure to a low dose of bisphenol A on behavior and memory in rats

    Carjone Rosa Gonçalves;Raquel Wigg Cunha;Daniela Marti Barros;Pablo Elías Martínez

  • Short- and long-term memory are differentially affected by metabolic inhibitors given into hippocampus and entorhinal cortex.

    L A Izquierdo;M Vianna;D M Barros;T Mello e Souza

  • Late and prolonged post-training memory modulation in entorhinal and parietal cortex by drugs acting on the cAMP/protein kinase A signalling pathway.

    P. Ardenghi;D. Barros;L. A. Izquierdo;L. Bevilaqua

  • Modulation of working memory and of long- but not short-term memory by cholinergic mechanisms in the basolateral amygdala.

    Daniela M. Barros;P. Pereira;J. H. Medina;I. Izquierdo

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Izquierdo
Ivan Izquierdo Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Jorge H. Medina
Jorge H. Medina Buenos Aires Institute of Technology
José Maria Monserrat
José Maria Monserrat Federal University of Rio Grande
Monica R. M. Vianna
Monica R. M. Vianna Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Lia R. M. Bevilaqua
Lia R. M. Bevilaqua Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
Martín Cammarota
Martín Cammarota Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
João Quevedo
João Quevedo The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Vania F. Prado
Vania F. Prado University of Western Ontario
Maurício Reis Bogo
Maurício Reis Bogo Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
James L. McGaugh
James L. McGaugh University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniela M. Barros

Trending Scientists