World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 49 6014 5537 350 320 174 8095

Vania F. Prado publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vania F. Prado between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vania F. Prado published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2022. 17 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2022. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 3 publications
1990 2026

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vania F. Prado: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 3
1999 5
2000 2
2001 3
2002 5
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 3
2007 3
2008 3
2009 2
2010 3
2011 7
2012 7
2013 15
2014 3
2015 15
2016 16
2017 12
2018 9
2019 16
2020 10
2021 14
2022 18
2023 8
2024 6
2025 14
2026 3
Total 219
Download as CSV

Vania F. Prado publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vania F. Prado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 174
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Vania F. Prado D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vania F. Prado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 49
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Exercise-linked FNDC5/irisin rescues synaptic plasticity and memory defects in Alzheimer's models

    Mychael V. Lourenco;Mychael V. Lourenco;Rudimar L. Frozza;Rudimar L. Frozza;Guilherme B. de Freitas;Guilherme B. de Freitas;Hong Zhang

  • An optimized acetylcholine sensor for monitoring in vivo cholinergic activity.

    Miao Jing;Yuexuan Li;Yuexuan Li;Jianzhi Zeng;Jianzhi Zeng;Pengcheng Huang

  • The Hsp70/Hsp90 Chaperone Machinery in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

    Rachel E. Lackie;Andrzej Maciejewski;Valeriy G. Ostapchenko;Jose Marques-Lopes

  • Mice Deficient for the Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter Are Myasthenic and Have Deficits in Object and Social Recognition

    Vania F. Prado;Cristina Martins-Silva;Braulio M. de Castro;Ricardo F. Lima

  • Optimizing Nervous System-Specific Gene Targeting with Cre Driver Lines : Prevalence of Germline Recombination and Influencing Factors

    Lin Luo;Mateusz C. Ambrozkiewicz;Fritz Benseler;Cui Chen

  • Regulation of acetylcholine synthesis and storage.

    Marco A.M Prado;Ricardo A.M Reis;V.F Prado;Maria Christina de Mello

  • Regulation of cholinergic activity by the vesicular acetylcholine transporter

    Vania F. Prado;Ashbeel Roy;Benjamin Kolisnyk;Robert Gros

  • The Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter Is Required for Neuromuscular Development and Function

    Braulio M. de Castro;Xavier De Jaeger;Xavier De Jaeger;Xavier De Jaeger;Cristina Martins-Silva;Cristina Martins-Silva;Ricardo D. F. Lima

  • Cholinergic circuits in cognitive flexibility.

    Vania F. Prado;Helena Janickova;Mohammed A. Al-Onaizi;Marco A.M. Prado

  • The Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 2 (TRPM2) Channel Contributes to β-Amyloid Oligomer-Related Neurotoxicity and Memory Impairment

    Valeriy G. Ostapchenko;Megan Chen;Monica S. Guzman;Yu-Feng Xie

  • Endocytic intermediates involved with the intracellular trafficking of a fluorescent cellular prion protein.

    Ana C. Magalhães;Juliana A. Silva;Kil S. Lee;Kil S. Lee;Vilma R. Martins

  • ChAT–ChR2–EYFP Mice Have Enhanced Motor Endurance But Show Deficits in Attention and Several Additional Cognitive Domains

    Benjamin Kolisnyk;Monica S. Guzman;Sandra Raulic;Jue Fan

  • The “ins” and “outs” of the high‐affinity choline transporter CHT1

    Fabiola M. Ribeiro;Stefanie A. G. Black;Stefanie A. G. Black;Vania F. Prado;R. Jane Rylett;R. Jane Rylett

  • Endocytosis of Prion Protein Is Required for ERK1/2 Signaling Induced by Stress-Inducible Protein 1

    Fabiana A. Caetano;Marilene H. Lopes;Glaucia N.M. Hajj;Cleiton F. Machado

  • Cardiomyocyte-secreted acetylcholine is required for maintenance of homeostasis in the heart

    Ashbeel Roy;William C. Fields;Cibele Rocha-Resende;Rodrigo R. Resende

  • PrPc on the road: trafficking of the cellular prion protein

    Marco A. M. Prado;Juliana Alves-Silva;Juliana Alves-Silva;Ana C. Magalhães;Vania F. Prado

  • Elimination of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter in the striatum reveals regulation of behaviour by cholinergic-glutamatergic co-transmission.

    Monica S. Guzman;Xavier De Jaeger;Xavier De Jaeger;Sanda Raulic;Ivana A. Souza;Ivana A. Souza

  • Analgesic effect in rodents of native and recombinant Phα1β toxin, a high-voltage-activated calcium channel blocker isolated from armed spider venom

    Alessandra H. Souza;Juliano Ferreira;Marta do Nascimento Cordeiro;Luciene Bruno Vieira

  • Non-neuronal cholinergic machinery present in cardiomyocytes offsets hypertrophic signals.

    Cibele Rocha-Resende;Ashbeel Roy;Rodrigo Resende;Marina S. Ladeira

  • Dysautonomia Due to Reduced Cholinergic Neurotransmission Causes Cardiac Remodeling and Heart Failure

    Aline Lara;Denis D. Damasceno;Rita Pires;Robert Gros

  • Amyloid-beta oligomers increase the localization of prion protein at the cell surface

    Fabiana A. Caetano;Fabiana A. Caetano;Flavio H. Beraldo;Glaucia N. M. Hajj;Andre L. Guimaraes

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco A. M. Prado
Marco A. M. Prado University of Western Ontario
Vilma R. Martins
Vilma R. Martins National Institute of Standards and Technology
Stephen S. G. Ferguson
Stephen S. G. Ferguson University of Ottawa
Marc G. Caron
Marc G. Caron Duke University
Lisa M. Saksida
Lisa M. Saksida University of Western Ontario
Timothy J. Bussey
Timothy J. Bussey University of Western Ontario
Robert Bartha
Robert Bartha University of Western Ontario
Sérgio D.J. Pena
Sérgio D.J. Pena Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Salah El Mestikawy
Salah El Mestikawy Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Ivan Izquierdo
Ivan Izquierdo Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens the door to a variety of flexible and rewarding career options. For those looking to enhance their qualifications, there are online certifications that pay well in fields related to neuroscience, psychology, and healthcare. These programs can help boost your earning potential and provide specialized knowledge without the need for a traditional classroom.

If you're seeking a more accessible path, exploring what is the easiest degree to get online can provide insight into degrees that offer flexibility and less demanding prerequisites. These options can help you start your academic journey or complement your neuroscience studies with related skills.

Many students with an interest in the social and behavioral aspects of neuroscience consider graduate programs such as msw programs online (Master of Social Work). Similarly, for those interested in behavioral analysis, pursuing bcba coursework online (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) is a practical and affordable option. These degrees and certifications can expand career pathways in clinical, research, or educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing Vania F. Prado

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles