World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
8919
World Ranking
5727
National Ranking
88

Petra Kaczensky publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra Kaczensky sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Petra Kaczensky D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra Kaczensky sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Petra Kaczensky is affiliated with the Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences in Norway. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions to subfields such as ecology, management, monitoring, policy and law, genetics, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, and ecological modeling.

The main topics of their work include wildlife ecology and conservation, rangeland management and livestock ecology, ecology and biodiversity studies, species distribution and climate change, rangeland and wildlife management, animal diversity and health studies, and animal behavior and welfare studies.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Petra Kaczensky cover a range of subjects related to ungulate ecology and conservation. These include:

  • The challenges and opportunities of coexisting with wild ungulates in the human-dominated landscapes of Europe's Anthropocene, 2020, published in Biological Conservation
  • Mapping out a future for ungulate migrations, 2021, published in Science
  • Causes, Consequences, and Conservation of Ungulate Migration, 2021, published in Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
  • Effects of body size on estimation of mammalian area requirements, 2020, published in Conservation Biology
  • Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns, 2023, published in Science

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Chris Walzer
  • Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar
  • John D. C. Linnell
  • Jacob R. Goheen
  • Thomas Mueller

Kaczensky has published multiple papers in various scientific venues, with some of the most frequent publication venues being:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Biological Conservation
  • Science
  • Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
  • Conservation Biology

Best Publications

  • Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes

    Guillaume Chapron;Petra Kaczensky;John D. C. Linnell;Manuela von Arx

  • Moving in the Anthropocene : global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements

    Marlee A. Tucker;Katrin Böhning-Gaese;William F. Fagan;John M. Fryxell

  • Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx

    Stephanie Schadt;Stephanie Schadt;Eloy Revilla;Eloy Revilla;Thorsten Wiegand;Felix Knauer

  • The challenges and opportunities of coexisting with wild ungulates in the human-dominated landscapes of Europe’s Anthropocene

    John Durrus Linnell;Benjamin Cretois;Erlend Birkeland Nilsen;Christer Moe Rolandsen

  • RULE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF SUITABLE HABITAT AND PATCH CONNECTIVITY FOR THE EURASIAN LYNX

    Stephanie Schadt;Stephanie Schadt;Felix Knauer;Petra Kaczensky;Eloy Revilla;Eloy Revilla

  • Public attitudes towards brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovenia

    Petra Kaczensky;Petra Kaczensky;Mateja Blazic;Hartmut Gossow

  • Global assessment of the non-equilibrium concept in rangelands.

    Henrik von Wehrden;Jan Hanspach;Jan Hanspach;Petra Kaczensky;Joern Fischer

  • The impact of high speed, high volume traffic axes on brown bears in Slovenia

    Petra Kaczensky;Petra Kaczensky;Felix Knauer;Blaz Krze;Marco Jonozovic

  • Resource selection by sympatric wild equids in the Mongolian Gobi

    P. Kaczensky;O. Ganbaatar;H. Von Wehrden;H. Von Wehrden;C. Walzer

  • Border Security Fencing and Wildlife: The End of the Transboundary Paradigm in Eurasia?

    John Durrus Linnell;Arie Trouwborst;Luigi Boitani;Petra Kaczensky

  • Status, management and distribution of large carnivores – bear, lynx, wolf & wolverine – in Europe

    M. Adamec;F. Álvares;O. Anders;H. Andrén

  • Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation.

    John D. C. Linnell;Petra Kaczensky;Ulrich Wotschikowsky;Nicolas Lescureux

  • Longest terrestrial migrations and movements around the world

    Kyle Joly;Eliezer Gurarie;Mathew S. Sorum;Petra Kaczensky

  • Mapping out a future for ungulate migrations.

    Matthew J. Kauffman;Francesca Cagnacci;Simon Chamaillé-Jammes;Mark Hebblewhite

  • Activity patterns of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovenia and Croatia

    P. Kaczensky;D. Huber;F. Knauer;H. Roth

  • Attitudes towards returning wolves (Canis lupus) in Germany: exposure, information sources and trust matter

    Ugo Arbieu;Marion Mehring;Nils Bunnefeld;Petra Kaczensky

  • Connectivity of the Asiatic wild ass population in the Mongolian Gobi

    Petra Kaczensky;Ralph Kuehn;Badamjav Lhagvasuren;Stephanie Pietsch

  • Fast food bears: brown bear diet in a human-dominated landscape with intensive supplemental feeding

    Irena Kavčič;Miha Adamič;Petra Kaczensky;Miha Krofel

  • The danger of having all your eggs in one basket--winter crash of the re-introduced Przewalski's horses in the Mongolian Gobi.

    Petra Kaczensky;Oyunsaikhan Ganbataar;Nanjid Altansukh;Namtar Enkhsaikhan

  • Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns

    Unknown

  • Causes, Consequences, and Conservation of Ungulate Migration

    Matthew J. Kauffman;Ellen O. Aikens;Ellen O. Aikens;Saeideh Esmaeili;Saeideh Esmaeili;Petra Kaczensky

  • Expansion of brown bears (Ursus arctos) into the eastern Alps: a spatially explicit population model

    Thorsten Wiegand;Felix Knauer;Petra Kaczensky;Javier Naves

  • Human influence on the choice of winter dens by European brown bears in Slovenia

    Welf Petram;Felix Knauer;Petra Kaczensky

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. C. Linnell
John D. C. Linnell Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Thomas Mueller
Thomas Mueller Goethe University Frankfurt
Peter Leimgruber
Peter Leimgruber Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Justin M. Calabrese
Justin M. Calabrese University of Maryland, College Park
William F. Fagan
William F. Fagan University of Maryland, College Park
Christian C. Voigt
Christian C. Voigt Leibniz Association
Marco Heurich
Marco Heurich University of Freiburg
Francesca Cagnacci
Francesca Cagnacci Fondazione Edmund Mach
Mark Hebblewhite
Mark Hebblewhite University of Montana
Henrik von Wehrden
Henrik von Wehrden Leuphana University of Lüneburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about fields like Ecology and Evolution, you may also be interested in related healthcare pathways, especially those offering flexibility and growth potential. Nursing degrees and career advances are now more accessible than ever, thanks to accredited online options.

Many students are drawn to online bridge programs, such as the rn to np programs online, which help registered nurses progress quickly toward becoming nurse practitioners. For those looking to accelerate their education, consider the fastest rn to bsn program online, designed to balance speed with quality education.

If you are eager to advance in your career, exploring fast track nurse practitioner programs can lead you from bedside care to advanced clinical and leadership roles more rapidly. Additionally, nurse practitioners with expertise in specialized areas often command competitive earnings—review the psych np salary to understand potential outcomes for those specializing in psychiatric care.

Exploring these pathways allows students from diverse science backgrounds to maximize their impact on community health and open new career doors.

Best Scientists Citing Petra Kaczensky

Trending Scientists