World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
80
Citations
26102
World Ranking
825
National Ranking
303

Mark Hebblewhite publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Hebblewhite sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 309 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark Hebblewhite D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Hebblewhite sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Hebblewhite is affiliated with the University of Montana in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Environmental Science, with a significant focus on subfields such as Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics that include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Rangeland and Wildlife Management, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Indigenous Studies and Ecology, and Ecology and Biodiversity Studies.

Frequent publication venues for their research include Ecology and Evolution, Ecological Applications, Environmental Research Letters, Ecosphere, and Conservation Science and Practice.

Mark Hebblewhite has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, notably Evelyn H. Merrill, Kyle Joly, Jesse Whittington, Adam T. Ford, and Hans Martin.

Among recent papers associated with their work are:

  • Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns (2023) published in Science
  • Disturbance type and species life history predict mammal responses to humans (2021) published in Global Change Biology
  • Mapping out a future for ungulate migrations (2021) published in Science
  • Habitat loss accelerates for the endangered woodland caribou in western Canada (2021) published in Conservation Science and Practice
  • Wave-like Patterns of Plant Phenology Determine Ungulate Movement Tactics (2020) published in Current Biology

Best Publications

  • Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.

    William J. Ripple;James A. Estes;Robert L. Beschta;Christopher C. Wilmers

  • Climate Change and Infectious Diseases: From Evidence to a Predictive Framework

    Sonia Altizer;Richard S. Ostfeld;Pieter T. J. Johnson;Susan Kutz

  • Moving in the Anthropocene : global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements

    Marlee A. Tucker;Katrin Böhning-Gaese;William F. Fagan;John M. Fryxell

  • Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals

    Cameron S. Gillies;Mark Hebblewhite;Scott E. Nielsen;Meg A. Krawchuk

  • Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology

    Mark Hebblewhite;Daniel T. Haydon

  • Ecological Consequences of Sea-Ice Decline

    Eric Post;Uma S. Bhatt;Cecilia M. Bitz;Jedediah F. Brodie

  • Human Activity Mediates a Trophic Cascade Caused by Wolves

    Mark Hebblewhite;Clifford A. White;Clifford A. White;Clifford G. Nietvelt;John A. McKenzie;John A. McKenzie

  • A MULTI-SCALE TEST OF THE FORAGE MATURATION HYPOTHESIS IN A PARTIALLY MIGRATORY UNGULATE POPULATION

    Mark Hebblewhite;Evelyn Merrill;Greg McDermid

  • Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data.

    Jacqueline L. Frair;John R Fieberg;Mark Hebblewhite;Francesca Cagnacci

  • Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection models

    Mark Hebblewhite;Evelyn Merrill

  • The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs

    Hawthorne L. Beyer;Daniel T. Haydon;Juan M. Morales;Jacqueline L. Frair

  • Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet's biodiversity with networks of remote sensors

    Robin Steenweg;Mark Hebblewhite;Roland Kays;Jorge Ahumada

  • Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale

    Jean-Michel Gaillard;Mark Hebblewhite;Anne Loison;Mark Fuller

  • Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf /elk predator /prey system

    M. Hebblewhite;E. H. Merrill;T. L. McDonald

  • Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate

    Mark Hebblewhite;Mark Hebblewhite;Evelyn H. Merrill

  • Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?

    John R Fieberg;Jason Matthiopoulos;Mark Hebblewhite;Mark S. Boyce

  • Caribou encounters with wolves increase near roads and trails: a time‐to‐event approach

    Jesse Whittington;Mark Hebblewhite;Nicholas J. DeCesare;Lalenia Neufeld

  • Multiscale wolf predation risk for elk: does migration reduce risk?

    Mark Hebblewhite;Mark Hebblewhite;Evelyn H. Merrill

  • Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation

    N. J. DeCesare;M. Hebblewhite;H. S. Robinson;M. Musiani

  • Transcending scale dependence in identifying habitat with resource selection functions

    Nicholas J. DeCesare;Mark Hebblewhite;Fiona Schmiegelow;David Hervieux

  • Effects of elk group size on predation by wolves

    Mark Hebblewhite;Daniel H Pletscher

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Musiani
Marco Musiani University of Bologna
Evelyn H. Merrill
Evelyn H. Merrill University of Alberta
Hugh S. Robinson
Hugh S. Robinson University of Montana
Eliezer Gurarie
Eliezer Gurarie SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Francesca Cagnacci
Francesca Cagnacci Fondazione Edmund Mach
Marco Heurich
Marco Heurich University of Freiburg
Dale G. Miquelle
Dale G. Miquelle Wildlife Conservation Society
John R. Squires
John R. Squires US Forest Service
Matthew J. Kauffman
Matthew J. Kauffman University of Wyoming
Stefano Mariani
Stefano Mariani Liverpool John Moores University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The interdisciplinary fields of Ecology and Evolution can open doors to many diverse and dynamic career options. Many students choose to supplement their knowledge with online degrees that offer flexibility and allow them to explore related or complementary areas.

For those interested in the intersection of environmental science and human behavior, clinical psychology master's programs online can provide valuable insights into mental health and behavior change—a crucial perspective for addressing conservation challenges.

If your passion lies in helping communities, a human services degree online can equip you with the skills to support individuals and families affected by environmental or social change.

Teachers or professionals looking for a new direction may be interested in career pivots, such as transitioning from educator to speech-language expert. Discover how professionals make a successful move from teacher to speech language pathologist, leveraging their education experience in new, impactful ways.

Finally, those interested in the built environment and sustainability might consider the best online architecture degree programs, which integrate concepts from ecology, design, and innovation to shape future-ready habitats.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Hebblewhite

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles