World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 47 1139 1059 12 10 154 12905

Constantin Blome publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Constantin Blome between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Constantin Blome published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2012. 16 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2012. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
2005 2025

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Constantin Blome: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 7
2008 7
2009 7
2010 11
2011 15
2012 23
2013 8
2014 12
2015 8
2016 9
2017 6
2018 7
2019 8
2020 11
2021 4
2022 6
2023 10
2024 8
2025 8
Total 176
Download as CSV

Constantin Blome publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantin Blome sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 150–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 154 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85 154
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Constantin Blome D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantin Blome sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69 47
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Constantin Blome is affiliated with Lancaster University Leipzig in Germany and specializes in Business, Management and Accounting, with particular focus on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, and Marketing. Their research also spans Sociology and Political Science as well as Business and International Management.

Their work centers around key topics such as Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management, Quality and Supply Management, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management, Environmental Sustainability in Business, and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development.

Blome has contributed extensively to the literature, with recent publications including:

  • "Facilitating artificial intelligence powered supply chain analytics through alliance management during the pandemic crises in the B2B context," 2021, Industrial Marketing Management
  • "Geopolitical disruptions in global supply chains: a state-of-the-art literature review," 2023, Production Planning & Control
  • "Supply chain collaboration and eco-innovations: An institutional perspective from China," 2020, Business Strategy and the Environment
  • "Determining the antecedents of dynamic supply chain capabilities," 2020, Supply Chain Management An International Journal
  • "Alliances and digital transformation are crucial for benefiting from dynamic supply chain capabilities during times of crisis: A multi-method study," 2024, International Journal of Production Economics

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research include Antony Paulraj, Martin C. Schleper, Christopher Rajkumar, Samuel Roscoe, and Nachiappan Subramanian. These collaborations reflect ongoing engagement with experts in various facets of supply chain and management studies.

Blome's work appears regularly in prominent academic venues, including:

  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management
  • Supply Chain Management An International Journal
  • International Journal of Production Economics
  • Industrial Marketing Management
  • Production Planning & Control

The scientist's research interest in risk management and sustainability intersects with current global challenges in business operations and supply networks, particularly under conditions of crisis and geopolitical change. They examine institutional and environmental dimensions of supply chains, addressing both strategic collaborations and digital transformation.

The focus on innovation and knowledge management also highlights an emphasis on developing capabilities to adapt to changing market and societal demands, especially in emerging economies and international contexts.

Best Publications

  • SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES IN ACHIEVING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

    Carsten Reuter;Kai Foerstl;Evi Hartmann;Constantin Blome

  • Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier

    Miriam M. Wilhelm;Constantin Blome;Vikram Bhakoo;Anthony Paulraj

  • Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment—Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry

    C. Reuter;K. Förstl;E. Hartmann;Constantin Blome

  • Big Data and Predictive Analytics and Manufacturing Performance: Integrating Institutional Theory, Resource-Based View and Big Data Culture

    Rameshwar Dubey;Angappa Gunasekaran;Stephen J. Childe;Constantin Blome

  • The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: the moderation effect of product complexity

    Dominik Eckstein;Matthias Goellner;Constantin Blome;Michael Henke

  • Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry

    Rameshwar Dubey;Nezih Altay;Angappa Gunasekaran;Constantin Blome

  • Antecedents and Enablers of Supply Chain Agility and its Effect on Performance

    Constantin Blome;Tobias Schoenherr;Daniel Rexhausen

  • The impact of knowledge transfer and complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view

    Constantin Blome;Tobias Schoenherr;Dominik Eckstein

  • Green procurement and green supplier development: Antecedents and effects on supplier performance

    Constantin Blome;Daniel Hollos;Antony Paulraj

  • Does Sustainable Supplier Cooperation Affect Performance

    Daniel Hollos;Constantin Blome;Kai Foerstl

  • Supply risk management in financial crises – a multiple case-study approach

    Constantin Blome;Tobias Schonherr

  • Focusing the financial flow of supply chains: an empirical investigation of financial supply chain management

    David A. Wuttke;Constantin Blome;Michael Henke

  • Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: a multi-theoretical perspective

    Antony Paulraj;Injazz J. Chen;Constantin Blome

  • Supply chain collaboration and sustainability: A profile deviation analysis

    Constantin Blome;Antony Paulraj;Kai Schuetz

  • Antecedents of Resilient Supply Chains: An Empirical Study

    Rameshwar Dubey;Angappa Gunasekaran;Stephen J. Childe;Thanos Papadopoulos

  • Supply chain evolution – theory, concepts and science

    Bart L. MacCarthy;Constantin Blome;Jan Olhager;Jagjit Singh Srai

  • Antecedents of proactive supply chain risk management - a contingency theory perspective

    Volker M. Grotsch;Constantin Blome;Martin C. Schleper

  • Managing the Innovation Adoption of Supply Chain Finance-Empirical Evidence From Six European Case Studies

    David A. Wuttke;Constantin Blome;Kai Foerstl;Michael Henke

  • Implementing sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Strategies and contingencies in managing sub-suppliers

    Miriam Wilhelm;Constantin Blome;Ellen Wieck;Cheng Yong Xiao

  • Dynamic supply chain capabilities: how market sensing, supply chain agility and adaptability affect supply chain ambidexterity

    Haris Aslam;Constantin Blome;Samuel Roscoe;Tashfeen M. Azhar

  • Sustainable global supplier management: The role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage

    Carsten Reuter;Kai Foerstl;Constantin Blome;Evi Hartmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Antony Paulraj
Antony Paulraj NEOMA Business School
Tobias Schoenherr
Tobias Schoenherr Michigan State University
Thanos Papadopoulos
Thanos Papadopoulos University of Kent
Evi Hartmann
Evi Hartmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Rameshwar Dubey
Rameshwar Dubey Montpellier Business School
Kayhan Tajeddini
Kayhan Tajeddini Sheffield Hallam University
Angappa Gunasekaran
Angappa Gunasekaran Penn State Harrisburg
Stephen J. Childe
Stephen J. Childe Plymouth University
Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson University of Melbourne
George Q. Huang
George Q. Huang Hong Kong Polytechnic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of business and management education is rapidly evolving. Online programs now make it possible for students around the world to pursue degrees tailored to diverse professional interests, all while balancing personal and work commitments.

Students seeking advanced leadership roles may consider a doctorate in organizational leadership online. This pathway focuses on developing strategic decision-making and organizational change leadership skills, ideal for executive or consulting careers.

For those ready to start their academic journey, choosing accredited online degree programs is critical to ensure quality education and employer recognition. Accreditation ensures your degree meets rigorous academic standards and boosts your job market value.

Specialized management roles are also in high demand. Fields like real estate development and building oversight benefit from an online bachelor's degree construction management. Likewise, students interested in the booming health sector can enroll in a healthcare administration degree online accredited to access management opportunities within hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Exploring these online degree options opens a wide range of career pathways in today’s competitive business world.

Best Scientists Citing Constantin Blome

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles