World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 43 1427 1334 604 549 123 7399

David M. Gligor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Gligor between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Gligor published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 9 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Gligor: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 4
2013 4
2014 7
2015 3
2016 6
2017 4
2018 2
2019 16
2020 8
2021 22
2022 16
2023 12
2024 19
2025 8
2026 1
Total 133
Download as CSV

David M. Gligor publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Gligor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 120–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 123 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112 123
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Gligor D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Gligor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69 43
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David M. Gligor is affiliated with Florida Gulf Coast University in the United States. Their research focuses on various domains in business, management, and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on supply chain management, digital marketing, and organizational behavior.

The scientist's primary fields of study include Business, Management and Accounting, and Social Sciences. Their subfields encompass Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management Information Systems, Marketing, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

Main topics investigated by David M. Gligor cover a range of supply chain and marketing issues:

  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management

Some of their recent publications include the following:

  • "Applying Blockchain for Halal food traceability," 2020, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications
  • "Utilizing blockchain technology for supply chain transparency: A resource orchestration perspective," 2021, Journal of Business Logistics
  • "Theorizing the dark side of business-to-business relationships in the era of AI, big data, and blockchain," 2021, Journal of Business Research
  • "Digital marketing and business-to-business relationships: a close look at the interface and a roadmap for the future," 2020, European Journal of Marketing
  • "Drones in last-mile delivery: A systematic review on Efficiency, Accessibility, and Sustainability," 2023, Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with David M. Gligor include:

  • Sıddık Bozkurt
  • İsmail Gölgeci̇
  • Michael J. Maloni
  • Nichole Gligor
  • Ivan Russo

The scientist has published extensively in several academic venues known for logistics and industrial marketing research. These include:

  • International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management
  • Industrial Marketing Management
  • Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
  • The International Journal of Logistics Management

Best Publications

  • Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile?

    David M. Gligor;Carol L. Esmark;Mary C. Holcomb

  • Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: a systematic literature review

    David M. Gligor;Mary C. Holcomb

  • A Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Agility: Conceptualization and Scale Development

    David M. Gligor;Mary C. Holcomb;Theodore P. Stank

  • Antecedents and Consequences of Supply Chain Agility: Establishing the Link to Firm Performance

    David M. Gligor;Mary C. Holcomb

  • Distinguishing between the concepts of supply chain agility and resilience: A multidisciplinary literature review

    David Gligor;Nichole Gligor;Mary Holcomb;Siddik Bozkurt

  • Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers

    Michael Maloni;Jomon Aliyas Paul;David M Gligor

  • An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: The role of a firm's orientations

    David M. Gligor;Mary C. Holcomb;Javad Feizabadi

  • The road to supply chain agility: an RBV perspective on the role of logistics capabilities

    David M. Gligor;Mary Holcomb

  • Applying Blockchain for Halal food traceability

    Albert Tan;David Gligor;Azizi Ngah

  • The Role of Personal Relationships in Facilitating Supply Chain Communications: A Qualitative Study

    David M. Gligor;Chad W. Autry

  • Does Socially Responsible Supplier Selection Pay Off for Customer Firms? A Cross‐Cultural Comparison

    LaDonna M. Thornton;Chad W. Autry;David M. Gligor;Anis Ben Brik

  • To be or not to be (loyal): Is there a recipe for customer loyalty in the B2B context?

    Ivan Russo;Ilenia Confente;David M. Gligor;Chad W. Autry

  • FsQCA versus regression: The context of customer engagement

    David Gligor;Siddik Bozkurt

  • The role of demand management in achieving supply chain agility

    David M. Gligor

  • Theorizing the dark side of business-to-business relationships in the era of AI, big data, and blockchain

    David M. Gligor;Kishore Gopalakrishna Pillai;Ismail Golgeci

  • The Role of Supply Chain Agility in Achieving Supply Chain Fit

    David M. Gligor

  • Drones in last-mile delivery: A systematic review on Efficiency, Accessibility, and Sustainability

    Unknown

  • Digital marketing and business-to-business relationships: a close look at the interface and a roadmap for the future

    Charles Hofacker;Ismail Golgeci;Kishore Gopalakrishna Pillai;David Marius Gligor

  • Building international business theory: A grounded theory approach

    David M Gligor;Carol L Esmark;Ismail Gölgeci

  • The impact of buyer firm information connectivity enablers on supplier firm performance : A relational view

    Nada R. Sanders;Chad W. Autry;David M. Gligor

  • A relational view of environmental performance: What role do environmental collaboration and cross-functional alignment play?

    Ismail Gölgeci;David M. Gligor;Ekrem Tatoglu;Ozlem Ayaz Arda

  • The benefits of logistics clustering

    Liliana Rivera;David Gligor;Yossi Sheffi

Frequent Co-Authors

Ismail Golgeci
Ismail Golgeci University of Auckland
Michael J. Maloni
Michael J. Maloni Kennesaw State University
Chad W. Autry
Chad W. Autry University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Ekrem Tatoglu
Ekrem Tatoglu Gulf University for Science & Technology
Linda D. Hollebeek
Linda D. Hollebeek Sunway University
Thomas J. Goldsby
Thomas J. Goldsby University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Nada R. Sanders
Nada R. Sanders Northeastern University
Barry J. Babin
Barry J. Babin University of Mississippi
Thomas Y. Choi
Thomas Y. Choi Arizona State University
Charles F. Hofacker
Charles F. Hofacker Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management studies in the USA opens the door to various online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many students now choose flexible online programs to advance their education and enter specialized fields.

One growing area is healthcare management. Pursuing an online healthcare administration degree can prepare you for leadership roles in medical organizations. Advancing further, a healthcare administration degree at the master’s level offers broader career prospects and higher salaries.

If your interest is in finance, earning an online accountant degree equips you for versatile roles in accounting, auditing, and tax preparation, all highly valued in business sectors.

For those seeking a technology-driven career path, the best ai masters programs online provide advanced skills that are in high demand across industries. Specializing in AI can open opportunities in data science, automation, and innovative business solutions.

With these online programs, you can build a foundation for a rewarding career tailored to emerging trends in business, technology, and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Gligor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles